• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Replace Nimoy in TSFS?

Provided they could have done so with a quality actor, could you have accepted a "new Spock" at the end of TSFS?

And would that of been the perfect opportunity to do so if it was going to be done at all?

In TSFS, Spock is aging at a accelerated rate that by the later scenes in the movie delivers us back to having Leonard Nimoy as Spock. However earlier in the movie we see a different actor as Spock. Please bear in mind that I'm not suggesting that that actor becomes Spock from that point forward.

Leonard Nimoy was on record as wanting to discontinue playing the character.

The scenario I am suggesting is that Spock doesn't age back to the approximate age he was when he died, but instead he "stops" at a earlier point, result in a Spock who would be about mid-thirties - early forties.

Obviously he wouldn't look like Nimoy.

The experience of being exposed to the Genesis effect and having his Kantra "re-fusioned" into his consciousness could be used to explain the new actor's take on the Spock character.

Any thoughts?
It would have been more realistic for Spock not to coincidentally return to his actual age.
However no-one has every played Spock better than Nimoy and noone ever will. Even cute little boy Spock.
Aside from that imagine Shatner having to compete against a younger man.
 
It would have been more realistic for Spock not to coincidentally return to his actual age.

I've always sort of assumed that Spock was younger than he looked (proportional to Vulcan aging) in TMP and TWOK and that the Genesis Effect actually made him age past where he'd been before. After all, he was only mid-50s as of TWOK, and we know from Sarek, Tuvok, and T'Pol that a Vulcan should still look like a human in their prime well into their 100s.

Let's see, Spock was 157 when he went back into the Kelvin Timeline and survived another 5 years, so he died of natural causes at 162, which is actually pretty young for a Vulcan. Sarek made it to 203, which was a typical Vulcan lifespan according to "Broken Bow" (although The Making of Star Trek set Vulcan life expectancy at 250). So that's consistent with my notion. Although Spock being half-human could also explain his faster aging and shorter lifespan.
 
It really wouldn't make sense to bring Spock back but with a new actor while the rest of the cast was the same as the television series

I disagree, I think it would have made perfect sense. The rest of the crew hadn't been regenerated from dead tissue by a terraformer-gone-crazy

It was less 'realistic' to bring back Mr Nimoy in that scenario. And that also precluded a lot of interesting possibilities ( Kirk vs younger Spock as suggested, Sarek and Amanda struggling to accept a 'new' son, relationship with Saavik )

Instead we were hit with the Universal Reset Trick. What a cop-out.
 
Kind of OT but why didn't Spock have a beard at end of Trek III when Kirk beamed him off genesis?
 
I disagree, I think it would have made perfect sense. The rest of the crew hadn't been regenerated from dead tissue by a terraformer-gone-crazy

It was less 'realistic' to bring back Mr Nimoy in that scenario. And that also precluded a lot of interesting possibilities ( Kirk vs younger Spock as suggested, Sarek and Amanda struggling to accept a 'new' son, relationship with Saavik )

Instead we were hit with the Universal Reset Trick. What a cop-out.
But there was no reason to bring in a new actor as Spock. What the studio and audiences wanted back then wasn't just Spock, it was Nimoy as Spock. Anything else would've been financial suicide.
 
Last edited:
Well they have accepted Zachary Quinto as Spock, although he does look a helluva lot like our Len but will they accept Ethan J.Peck in DSC? Time will tell...
I was talking about in the context of the early 1980s. It's a very different thing to cast someone else in the role when you're telling the story of a young Spock and Nimoy is in his late 70s or deceased. The question was about recasting Spock for Star Trek III at a time when Nimoy was active and available, and no, I don't think it would have worked.
 
Nope! In 1983 there would have been a lot of dissent about someone taking over the role of Spock!
JB
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top