After watching Star Wars Rogue One, and how they were able to put Tarkin's face on that actor using CGI... Made me think:
Why not CGI the Klingons to be consistent with TNG?
don't give me that augment virus crap either, that was a cover-up Lol
Why not CGI the Klingons to be consistent with TNG?
Don't you mean Discovery? We could CG the new uniforms on the actors and everythingAfter watching Star Wars Rogue One, and how they were able to put Tarkin's face on that actor using CGI... Made me think:
Why not CGI the Klingons to be consistent with TNG?
don't give me that augment virus crap either, that was a cover-up Lol
I'd leave the TOS Klingons alone, but if they were changed it should be extremely subtle, more along the lines if Chang, Azetbur, and Valkris than anything we see in TNG or Disco.
What I'd like to see in a re-remastering of TOS would be to use the restored 11 ft model in the Smithsonian to recreate all the original stock shots of the ship that were used in the original FX and then splice them into every episode where appropriate.
What I'd like to see in a re-remastering of TOS would be to use the restored 11 ft model in the Smithsonian to recreate all the original stock shots of the ship that were used in the original FX and then splice them into every episode where appropriate.
Tarkin and Leia looked dreadful for a live action production. They would have been great in a video game.After watching Star Wars Rogue One, and how they were able to put Tarkin's face on that actor using CGI... Made me think:
Why not CGI the Klingons to be consistent with TNG?
don't give me that augment virus crap either, that was a cover-up Lol
That wouldn't reflect original broadcast, since Bonanza aired on a different night and on the same network.and ghost images of "Bonanza"
Ask George LucasWhy would I want to change the show that is the basis for the entire universe to be more consistent with what came later? The original Star Trek is what it is, for good and ill. Leave it alone.
...
The hyperbole here is a little much. Not all of the CGI in Trek remastered was bad. Of course, given that it was what, 10+ years ago, it's starting to age, but more of it was good than bad. After having seen what is possible with even fan-film level stuff like Continues, of course, it does make one wish they would go back and redo it, but TOS at this point as a legacy property is sort of played out. The main problem I have with the remastered is with the flatness or washed-out quality of the picture. This is particularly evident in how the nacelles looked. The models were ok and the matte painting replacements were also generally ok and the movements and camera angles were fairly reserved. I just don't think it can coax enough fans to bang on plates loud enough for anything to be done. You're more like to see TMP CG remastered because there's far more interest in that.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.