• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Reign of the Supermen...who were YOU rooting for?

darkwing_duck1

Vice Admiral
For those who read it, which of the four claimants to the shield did you REALLY want to see get it and why? And which one, if any, did you think WAS Superman (when they were strongly hinting that it was one of the four)?

I was rooting for the Metropolis Kid myself. Knew up front he wasn't the "real deal" of course (he even admits it on TV). I was looking forward to spending years watching him "grow into his legacy".

Of the other 3, I thought the Cyborg was possibly the real Superman. It just made sense that as badly hurt as Supes was, that it would be the only way to "heal" him.
 
I don't recall but having recently re-read it, the Last Son or the Cyborg are the most obvious candidates. I thought the Cyborg was the most interesting character, Superboy the most entertaining, and Steel the most boring. I like Steel now though (is he on a team at the mo? last time I saw him was 52!)
 
^I agree about Steel. I don't know his status at present. And Last Son was my other choice (at that time) as Real Superman...I never bought the "soul migration" thing with Steel at all...
 
Steel was the only one who definitely wasn't portrayed as a possible "real" Superman- he acknowledged from the start that he was a stand-in.

Personally I thought the (one who turned out to be the) Eradicator was the most likely.
 
Hmm, as iconic as Superman's death storyline was, I've read it twice, but never bothered with what it led into.. I might give it a shot.
 
You should. The Death was only so-so compared to the big storyline that followed.

I never really bought into the idea that ANY of the four were the real successors to the Man of Steel. I had roughly figured out the deal with Superboy, Last Son, and Steel right away but the Cyborg threw me. I didn't think he was Superman but I didn't know what he was either.
 
Same here. But it became obvious after a little while that they weren't giving the Cyborg as much attention as the other three. They had very few stories done from his perspective (for reasons that are obvious, in retrospect). Also, there was ZERO discussion of how he'd been "rebuilt" or by whom. Unfortunately, that didn't make him more intriguing-- it just made him a cipher. And it made me wonder why they bothered having a fourth Superman. When the big reveal came, it wasn't as surprising as it could have been.

I think it would have been better if the Cyborg had provided some kind of backstory for himself, explaining what had happened. Even if it turned out to be a lie, it would have made him more even with the other Supermen. I also think the "Reign" story should have gone on a little longer. When the story finally played out, the Cyborg's big reveal would have been much more shocking.

Better yet, maybe they should have given him a backstory that the other characters accept, but the smart reader knows is false-- like saying he was rebuilt by L.E.G.I.O.N., or something. They were already dropping clues about the Eradicator, and I figured out who he was early on. This would have been no different.
 
Did you read the novel the Death and Life of Superman? I think I read that in one night when I was younger.
 
Wasn't that the novelization of the storyline? Never saw it. I did, however, get to read the comics when they were new, rather than in trade form. And I still have them. Plus an extra copy of Death, still in its black bag. :cool:
 
Cyborgs and clones had been done to death, even at that time. I really liked the idea behind STEEL. You would think that at least ONE out of 5 billion people would be so inspired by Superman that they would make a conscious effort to try and stand-in after his death. I was also glad to see the character continue after the story.
 
I am reading the novel now, but the way the story is structured makes the novel feel a bit weird. The most exciting part comes in the first third, and then it goes into mystery mode.
 
i thought it was Eradicator when i read the trades. i never bought it being Cyborg.

fucking hated the mullet they gave Clark too...
 
I thought the Last Son of Krypton was obviously the Eradicator, but like others said, the Cyborg Superman was a surprise (even more so since I didn't read the original issues with Hank Henshaw and his not!Fantastic Four crew on the space shuttle until later).

I really thought it was Steel. They made a point of showing, what looked like a transference, when they did the flashback to Superman rescuing John Henry after he fell from the structure. I knew it wasn't really him, but I thought maybe his soul was residing in John Henry until his body could come back, somehow.

I also saw the deliberate parallel between Superman dealing with the crowd after saving Lois on the Space Plane and John Henry rescuing her. That and his downplaying it. The real Superman wouldn't have made the big show that Superboy did.
 
I too read this storyline back when the issues were 'fresh' and its sort of the storyline that really got me into comics. I kinda was going between the Cyborg and Last Son - partially because both were pretty similar in the way of knowing things.

Although the Cyborg turned into a far longer lasting character than the Eradicator.
 
To be honest I was one of those waiting for Clark to return but out of the four of them I thought Superboy had the most legitimate chance of being Superman if they had chosen to go that root. I remember being intrigued by Cyborg Superman. I didn't like the Eradicator and I thought Steel was alright.
 
Listened to the BBC radio adaptation recently. So this is all fresh on my mind.

Did anyone else find it a cheat that none of the 4 where the real Superman?

I can understand why none of those characters turned out to be him. The Last Son was closest but once they showed him willing to kill criminals they never would have allowed it to be him.

No the real cheat was in that Superman's actual resurrection is totally sidestepped. Treated "off camera". It seemed to be an issue that was deliberately avoid after that as well.
 
I thought it was Bibbo. He had the costume, he was unselfishly heroic, he was featured (briefly) in Adventures #500, and he had a dog named Krypto. Death of Superman was the first Superman story I had read, so I had no idea about Eradicators, LexBrains, Protoplasms, Monguls, or Cadmi, but I still enjoyed every page of it.

Seriously, I thought it was the Last Son. I thought he'd had the sense beat out of him by Doomsday, and reverted to a primitive Kryptonian state. In the end his humanity would be restored, perhaps with the help of the other Supermen or Pa Kent's shovel, and he'd be back to normal.
 
I really thought it was Steel. They made a point of showing, what looked like a transference, when they did the flashback to Superman rescuing John Henry after he fell from the structure. I knew it wasn't really him, but I thought maybe his soul was residing in John Henry until his body could come back, somehow.
I thought the same, and remember the "transference" panel you speak of. I also liked the character of Irons a lot and I'm glad to see Steel getting a bit more time in comics nowadays. For a while, they really didn't know what they were doing with him. This also seemed like the least "obvious" of the four, which is why the idea appealed to me.
 
Wow, it's neat to see this classic comic story line get some attention, after all these years! I remember hearing the news making an announcement, and the family talking about it in brief. Plenty of people were cynical enough to observe that it was likely a clever way to grab readers' attention (which it was, but at least they seemed to make an effort to make things really interesting).

My brother bought only the actual comic featuring Superman's death, because he didn't like Superman and the idea of him, too goody-two shoes to be likeable (or something to that effect). My own curiosity was peaked when they talked about four new Supermen arriving to fill Superman's shoes, and it was made easier when a friend pointed to a supermarket that sold a package of comics that included the double sized issue with the spiritual journey that showed Jonathan Kent convincing Kal-El to come back, as well as four issues that featured the debut of each of the four Supermen. The packet also had a few other goodies related to it; there were these things that I think were called poggles, and there was this really awesome poster with all four Supermen in cool action poses, with the tagline "But which is the real one?"

I didn't really follow the series beyond that pack of five issues, but occasionally took a peak at the Superman comics as time went on. I was never really preoccupied with the question of which was the real one, though. I always liked entertaining the idea that each one really was the real Superman in their own way; that his death and resurrection had somehow caused aspects of him to refract into four different aspects or versions of himself, and each were close to each other in terms of strength; so his death and resurrection had made him, and the idea of him, stronger.

In those days, I found comic books to be impractical to invest too much interest in; it was always frustrating to face what I felt was an impenetrable labyrinth of continuity and years of storytelling that I could never hope to catch up on, and the trend of comic series cross-referencing each other drove me nuts. Additionally, I had a very unsatisfying experience with a Star Trek TNG Borg story that caught my eye, and I made a concerted effort to try and get the whole four part story; which I managed for the first three parts, but the third disappear from stores unbelievably quickly. All these elements, and the last one in particular, were the death of comic book collecting for me for many long years. The bright spot in all this angst about comics was Dave Sterns' novel, The Death and Life of Superman!

I had given up on knowing the details of Superman's true resurrection except by word of mouth and second and third hand rumor (in retrospect, I'm actually surpised by how good information can turn out to be by way of this method, I've been surprised by how accurate reports were for that original Classic G.I. Joe comic series!) Anyway, having given up on knowing Superman's story, I was surprised one day when I saw that book in the store. I went war-wacky, I had to have that book! I spent a week doing chores to get the money I needed for that thing! After a week, I was terrified at the thought that the book might have sold out; but I had the money, and begged and cajoled my mother to take me back to the mall.

I absolutely devoured that book. It was the most wonderful thing to get exposure to the back story elements that were behind every continuity reference, and it was a godsend to have the whole story of Superman's death and rebirth consolidated into one volume of prose storytelling. No need to worry about any comic issues I might have missed; I finished the book with a sense of satisfaction I never thought possible.

I only felt some twinge of disappointment about each moment when the possibilites of the four Supermen were collapsed, and their true origins revealed. I felt it tragically diminished them. Still, I always hold an alternative bubble of continuity in my head, where the four Supermen are permitted to remain as legitimate aspects of the original Superman; having died and resurrected, and irrevocably changed by the experience.
 
I liked how each of the characters had something about them that reminded me of Kal-El, yet in some cases exagerrated. Steel was the morality and sense of duty to go out and help others. The Last Son was obviously Kal's Kryptonian side. Those were the two most obvious.

Cyborg was the outsider who, in my opinion, had the most "Superman-like" adventures (for example, saving the President just screams "SUPERMAN!").

And Superboy had Kal's boyishness, but, magnified by 1,000. Still, the better Superman writers acknowledge this aspect of Superman, and it's always fun seeing him interact with younger kids by doing things like playing baseball or simply being the hero to take the time to talk to them on their level (In one of my all-time favorite Superman stories, A Superman for All Seasons, Jeph Loeb, of all people [I know...right?!], had a great scene where Superman saves a boy, talks to him, and the boy says he likes Superman's outfit, to which he replies that his mom made it for him). Superman playing baseball is usually a great example of this (another great Superman story was by Geoff Johns where a fight with Major Force interrupts a Little League game. Geoff really captured Superman in this issue by having him let Major Force know his Boy Scout ways did not apply to criminals, finishes him off, and then joins the game for a short bit).

So to me, I wasn't disappointed, I thought the characters spotlighted these attributes well, while also showing it was a mix of them that made the character so great.

On a side note, another thing that made "Reign of the Supermen" such a great story was that it played to each of the creator's strengths, which is an extension of the attribute examples from above. They each took a part of Superman and crafted their own stories, which began to interweave as the storyline progressed, but still maintained what was unique about that particular character and comic.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top