• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Reading Marathon: The Typhon Pact... and Beyond!

Typhon Pact: Raise the Dawn by David R. George III
Published:
July 2012
Time Span: August 2383 - September 2384

Plagues of Night and Raise the Dawn are very much one of those duologies that's one novel in two parts. In my review of Plagues of Night, I wrote, "Plagues of Night [is] very much a novel of set-up, especially for the traditional protagonist characters [...]. We get glimpses of Sisko captaining the Robinson, the Enterprise battling Tzenkethi privateers, and updates for a number of long-unseen characters on Deep Space 9 (plus introductions to new ones). These characters don't really drive any kind of plot, except on a personal level. The plot drivers all happen at the galactic political level, with characters like Praetor Gell Kamemor and President Nan Bacco making the choices that shape the story." I also said I felt like I couldn't really judge it until I read part two.

I don't think Raise the Dawn lived up to the set-up of Plagues of Night. Plagues of Night felt like I was watching David R. George play a game of cosmic chess, moving characters into position for some kind of exciting end game. Unfortunately, no exciting end game ever emerges. Instead, it feels as though the book is a series of conversations between people about how much they do not know about things. President Bacco talks to Esperanza Piñiero, Praetor Gell Kamemor talks to her nephew, Sisko talks to Odo, Kamemor talks to Bacco, around and around this novel goes with long conversations about how much no one knows about what's going on, with no new information being uncovered. It's especially frustrating because the reader does know what's going on. It's not until around 300 pages into this novel of almost 400 that I felt like people really began to figure anything out worth knowing. The end does have a pretty dramatic climax, but by that point I was too checked out to enjoy it very much, although Odo becoming a space creature and flying into the Bajoran Wormhole is pretty badass.

The really weird thing about the book is that when I got to the end, I realized Gell Kamemor is the protagonist. Its her decisions that tend to move things forward; the antagonists (Tomalak and Sela) are primarily operating against her. This is okay, though I wish Kamemor was more interesting; mostly she seems to just give long speeches about how she's a nice Romulan. I guess, based on some comments here, she was in Serpents Among the Ruins? I don't remember her at all.

But if Gell Kamemor is the protagonist... what are all these other characters doing in the book? That Deep Space 9 should be destroyed in a book very much not a Deep Space Nine books reeks of the worst aspects of comic book crossovers, where some mid- or lower-tier character is cynically killed or maimed in a high-tier book to prove the situation is serious without actually hurting any high-tier characters (e.g., Infinite Crisis, Infinite Crisis Companion, World War III). It just seems weird that something as titanic as destroying DS9 would not really result in a story about DS9, but just raise the stakes in a story about Gell Kamemor. We get a lot of the DS9 crew on Bajor post-destruction, but it's not really a story, more snapshots of exposition so that we know where the new DS9 comes from when it finally materializes (it's halfway done by the time of the book's epilogue), so I assume I will be seeing it in future novels. O'Brien and Nog come back, Quark is doing a thing, Ro is in charge. It's all kind of pointless within the context of story actually being told here, and it's all very low-key given how significant the actual destruction is. One would hope that the destruction of DS9 would feel significant to the characters and stories of DS9, but it's just kind of a thing that happened.

Finally, Sisko. Sisko finally goes back to his family in this book, but I found the explanation of the Prophets' prophecy tortured and ultimately unsatisfying. Sisko couldn't be with Kasidy because it would lead to sorrow, but the sorrow actually came from not being with Kasidy because he ran away from her because of the prophecy, so he can be with Kasidy because... you can't step in the same river twice? What was the point of this whole storyline, because it just makes Sisko look like a giant asshole. It's hard for me to believe Kasidy would even want him back after all this, because who wants a spouse whose reaction to crisis is to run off with no discussion? He's clearly not committed to her or their child or their relationship in any meaningful way, even if he did technically come home in the end.

Continuity Notes:
  • No one mentions that this is actually the second time Odo plunged into the Bajoran Wormhole like a badass. (Time's Enemy is technically in continuity thanks to S.C.E. and DTI.)
  • Like me, David R. George seems to have found Nog's motivations for joining the Challenger crew in Indistinguishable from Magic confusing, so when Ro asks why Nog did it, Nog himself can't provide an answer-- and then provides four different ones, none of which convince. I feel like I would have glossed over this instead of spending two ultimately unsatisfactory pages on it.
  • Lots of discussion of the status of Andorians in Starfleet; no mention of how Starfleet recalled Andorians from sensitive posts in Fallen Gods. And hey, I'm assuming those transporter duplicates will become important any book now.
Other Notes:
  • This book could be a hundred pages shorter without all the exposition. I feel like the dialogue is always contorting to have the characters communicate things that 1) could be more smoothly communicated in narration, 2) the reader actually already knows, because they saw the tv show (or, in some cases, read this very book), and/or 3) don't actually matter. Like, there are multiple discussions of the so-called planet in the wormhole from "Emissary." But never upon watching "Emissary" did I think there really was a planet, and it ultimately doesn't even matter, so why does it need to be crowbarred into dialogue multiple times.
  • The narration itself does this too. For example, at one point Picard thinks to himself about who Kira is, how he knows who Kira is, and how the Enterprise rescued Kira earlier in the book. I don't need the specifics of Picard's knowledge of Kira spelled out, why would I, and why do I need to be told the Enterprise rescued her. I remember it because it happened in the book I am reading!
  • I found the motivation of the DS9 bomber profoundly unsatisfying and improbable.

Great review!
 
Finally, Sisko. Sisko finally goes back to his family in this book, but I found the explanation of the Prophets' prophecy tortured and ultimately unsatisfying. Sisko couldn't be with Kasidy because it would lead to sorrow, but the sorrow actually came from not being with Kasidy because he ran away from her because of the prophecy, so he can be with Kasidy because... you can't step in the same river twice? What was the point of this whole storyline, because it just makes Sisko look like a giant asshole. It's hard for me to believe Kasidy would even want him back after all this, because who wants a spouse whose reaction to crisis is to run off with no discussion? He's clearly not committed to her or their child or their relationship in any meaningful way, even if he did technically come home in the end.

The thing I felt was strangest about that story was that it just completely passed over the far-easier-to-get-around "penance" from "Sacrifice of Angels," that "Sisko is of Bajor, but he will find no rest there." That seems like it would've been a much easier way to inject drama into Ben's happily-ever-after without completely invalidating it, rather than doubling-down on, then double-talking around, the prophecy about them getting married. And I understand the circumstances that led to it, but I really think waiting, what, almost a decade to finish filling out what happened during the Great DS9 Time-Skip (even though, God help me, the way it was finally done almost feels like it was intended from the start) was a massive misstep, and they would've been better served doing what the Voyager novels did and just having one big book that covers several years as a bridge (I know, everyone thinks that, but, still). Even seeing it dramatized, it still feels unlikely that the family man of Star Trek would abandon his family, but having to accept second-hand that he was driven away because he thought he was bad luck was completely unconvincing.

  • The narration itself does this too. For example, at one point Picard thinks to himself about who Kira is, how he knows who Kira is, and how the Enterprise rescued Kira earlier in the book. I don't need the specifics of Picard's knowledge of Kira spelled out, why would I, and why do I need to be told the Enterprise rescued her. I remember it because it happened in the book I am reading!

I can't remember if this was the height of it or if that's still to come, but I definitely noticed DRG3 getting very recap-happy, spending a couple of pages reiterating what happened three or four scenes earlier. I think his last couple books didn't have that issue, though.
 
And I understand the circumstances that led to it, but I really think waiting, what, almost a decade to finish filling out what happened during the Great DS9 Time-Skip (even though, God help me, the way it was finally done almost feels like it was intended from the start) was a massive misstep, and they would've been better served doing what the Voyager novels did and just having one big book that covers several years as a bridge (I know, everyone thinks that, but, still).
Even covering it seems like it would have been unsatisfying, because where it all ends up isn't very interesting to me. George has almost completely broken up the characters of the DS9 relaunch, but not replaced them with anyone. No Kira, no Shar, no Vaughn, no Taran'atar. And the ones who are left all feel isolated; Bashir and Ro don't interact much with anyone outside of themselves. I don't see what storytelling possibilities are gained here.
 
Last edited:
Great review Stevil - and it seems we are on the same page about much of it. DRG3's choices with the DS9 stories have often been controversial, and I have tried my best to go with it and not complain too much. But I think eventually I just stopped caring, and didn't even read his latest DS9 book.

I too felt an overwhelming sense of "meh" at the destruction of Deep Space Nine itself, and I really shouldn't have. And I think with this bit of your review, you've hit upon why:

It's all kind of pointless within the context of story actually being told here, and it's all very low-key given how significant the actual destruction is. One would hope that the destruction of DS9 would feel significant to the characters and stories of DS9, but it's just kind of a thing that happened.


DS9 was always a TV series about huge galactic events, but the writers always did really well at focusing those events through the characters we knew on the station so that they felt personal and immediate. With this particular set of big galactic events, the characters on DS9 have very little to do with it. They are affected by events they are not directly involved in or have any influence on, so that removes that intense connection that would let the reader really feel the events rather than just observe them.

Finally, Sisko. Sisko finally goes back to his family in this book, but I found the explanation of the Prophets' prophecy tortured and ultimately unsatisfying.


If I can obnoxiously push my own writing here, I recently completed my series fleshing out what the familiar DS9 crew were doing during the Borg Invasion (see my sig). In it I spent a lot of time trying to lead the characters up to the changes seen in the later novels - Sisko's depression, Kira's joining the church, Ro's move into command. I like to think I've done a good job of making DRG3's choices with those characters feel more organic and less out of nowhere - specifically re Sisko, I grounded his depression in the events of the Borg Invasion and (my version of) the Ascendant conflict. I'd love for you to give it a read, it won't spoil anything for the later novels.

Lots of discussion of the status of Andorians in Starfleet; no mention of how Starfleet recalled Andorians from sensitive posts in Fallen Gods. And hey, I'm assuming those transporter duplicates will become important any book now.


I'd certainly be happy if that story point about the transporter duplicates is painted over and never spoken of again - I hated it with a passion.
Plus, as of "A Ceremony of Losses", it no longer matters.

I feel like the dialogue is always contorting to have the characters communicate things that 1) could be more smoothly communicated in narration, 2) the reader actually already knows, because they saw the tv show (or, in some cases, read this very book), and/or 3) don't actually matter. Like, there are multiple discussions of the so-called planet in the wormhole from "Emissary." But never upon watching "Emissary" did I think there really was a planet, and it ultimately doesn't even matter, so why does it need to be crowbarred into dialogue multiple times.


Yeah the recapping really starts to get out of control, especially when he recaps the story you're reading while you're reading it. As for "Emissary"...
I don't remember anything about that 'planet' from PoN/RtD, but I do remember that 'planet' appears three novels further along in "Ascendance", so I guess DRG3 was setting stuff up really early.

...waiting, what, almost a decade to finish filling out what happened during the Great DS9 Time-Skip (even though, God help me, the way it was finally done almost feels like it was intended from the start) was a massive misstep...


You're right, I do give him that.
The way Kira went back in time to witness those events was a very clever way of bringing the reader back to witness them along with her, so kudos and indeed 'props' are hereby offered on that particular score.

George has almost completely broken up the characters of the DS9 relaunch, but not replaced them with anyone. No Kira, no Shar, no Vaughn, no Taran'atar. And the ones who are left all feel isolated; Bashir and Ro don't interact much with anyone outside of themselves. I don't see what storytelling possibilities are gained here.


I've lamented before that the first set of nu-DS9 characters we were introduced to in "Avatar" - Vaughn, Shar, Tenmei, Taran'atar - are still memorable and beloved even these many years later after they have mostly left the story (I know Tenmei is still a regular but I'm making a point here). And the new characters that have replaced them are absolute zeroes whose names I can barely remember.

It only gets worse IMO, and it's not all down to DRG3. The DS9 novels have splintered to such an extent that each author seems to just follow their own pet character on their own story, and none of those characters or stories have anything to do with each other.
 
I don't know what happened, but right around the time the Typhon Pact started DRG III's books went from being some of the absolutely best Trek Lit out there, to being meh. I enjoyed Rough Beasts of Empire, Plagues of Night, and Raise the Dawn, but they were definitely no where near as good as Mission Gamma: Twilight, or Serpents Among the Ruins, and Revelation and Dust is one of the most boring books I have every read in my entire life. The book is almost 400 pages, and nothing happens until the last hundredish pages.
 
Sorry if I ruined things for you.
I'm just teasing! It was just that both you and @lvsxy808 dissing future novels in your replies stuck out to me. I'm largely already aware of the consensus around most novels I'm going to read, because I still follow the discussions on the BBS even though I am behind.
 
You're right, I do give him that.
The way Kira went back in time to witness those events was a very clever way of bringing the reader back to witness them along with her, so kudos and indeed 'props' are hereby offered on that particular score.

While that one had a fairly direct tie-in with the present-day storyline and is a pretty good example, the one I was really thinking of that really succeeded was
the way both Rebecca-abduction storylines ended up playing off each other in "Original Sin."
 
I'm just teasing! It was just that both you and @lvsxy808 dissing future novels in your replies stuck out to me. I'm largely already aware of the consensus around most novels I'm going to read, because I still follow the discussions on the BBS even though I am behind.

I enjoy the DS9 novels that aren't mainline story. DRG's mainline story for the actual station has not been interesting for a long time to me. The cast of characters is so huge now, with barely any TV characters on the station or even interacting with it, and the remaining characters have been set dressing since the days of Shar and Tenmei and Vaughn :(. The foundation of cool characters and interactions are there...but it's sad that for a series that brought huge character development and drama to Star Trek now exists in a novel line that doesn't have any of that good stuff anymore. I mean, has Slaine done anything?

But I am 100% down for more Adventures of Captain Sisko in the Third Quadrant, and for them not to jump back to that god forsaken time skip. I'm hoping that now the gaps have been filled we never have to hear about that time skip again. That is...if we get anymore novels for DS9 at all, haha.
 
I don't think Raise the Dawn lived up to the set-up of Plagues of Night. Plagues of Night felt like I was watching David R. George play a game of cosmic chess, moving characters into position for some kind of exciting end game. Unfortunately, no exciting end game ever emerges.

I think this sums up every DS9 novel post this one for me.
 
It's kind of sad really, the DS9 Relaunch is part of what really got into Trek Lit, but now DRGIII's mainline books are probably my least favorite Trek Lit series.
 
Yeah. I still can’t finish the Captain Sisko and USS Robinson solo story. That kind of ran out of gas about 1/4 of the way in and was trying to coast and backup into the driveway on fumes.
 
Yeah. I still can’t finish the Captain Sisko and USS Robinson solo story. That kind of ran out of gas about 1/4 of the way in and was trying to coast and backup into the driveway on fumes.
Same! I still haven't finished it off...
 
Ro remains a character I want to read more about. DS9 was good at introducing new off-screen characters, but sadly this has changed.
 
Typhon Pact: Brinkmanship by Una McCormack
Published:
October 2012
Time Span: November 2383

Brinkmanship rounds out the eight-book Typhon Pact saga, though the Pact itself will obviously continue to cast a shadow over galactic events. It could feel like an odd coda after Plagues of Night and Raise the Dawn pulled all the previous threads together (I suspect it reads weirdly in the context of The Khitomer Accords Saga omnibus), but it's the best of all these books, and so a good stopping point.

There is no better writer of Star Trek tie-ins than Una McCormack. One of the things that makes her so good is her careful consideration of point-of-view; this book is told from three perspectives, those of Ezri Dax, Beverly Crusher, and Neta Efheny (a Cardassian spy on Ab-Tzenketh). The choice of viewpoint characters isn't incidental, or just done for reasons of plot, as it often is in tie-in fiction, but suffuses the entire book. In both Ezri and Crusher, we get principled women whose principles keep getting broken on the rocks of realpolitik. Both are healers (kind of), and have an earnest belief in what the Federation does; both have made hard choices in their day but refuse to believe that values have to be abandoned in order to be saved.

I liked this depiction of Ezri. I often struggle to connect the character the Destiny-era novels call "Ezri" with the one from television; Brinkmanship threads that needle by showing how Ezri's occasionally foolish compassion informs her command style. The Aventine doesn't get much action here, but we get to watch Ezri do her level best to prevent a war in the best Star Trek tradition. She's tested by her discovery of what one of her friends from the Academy has become in this dark new era, and that works as a stand-in for what Starfleet and the Federation as a whole have been through. I liked the Aventine's solution to the stand-off, which manages to be humanitarian and manipulative at the same time.

Crusher was an unexpected choice for viewpoint character of the Enterprise-E thread; she's often an observer, not a mover. But this is what makes her work as a main character. As Picard points out, he already knows how to play this game, but Crusher still has her ideals. I liked her interactions with various participants in the negotiations, especially Madame Ilka, the Ferengi ambassador (I hope we get to see her again). Crusher ends up playing essentially no plot-relevant role, but that's not a bug, it's a feature. Like Ezri, she learns what it's like to balance ideals with realpolitik. This book, incidentally, is probably the first to make me feel like Crusher and Picard are actually married, with nice little details of their relationship (such as how they work a room at a reception), though to be honest, I think it would have worked just as well with them as friends.

The remaining third was the best one, about an undercover Cardassian on Ab-Tzenketh. It's got great touches, such as how she recognizes that one of her associates is also a spy, but for the Federation, and how that spy works out that she's a Cardassian. Efenhy is a patriot, but adrift in the less regimented post-Dominion Cardassian society, she finds solace in the strictly regimented Tzenkethi society. This was an excellent spy thriller, as Efenhy makes a number of awful but entirely comprehensible choices-- but one potentially really empowering one.

I also really appreciated the insight we got into Tzenkethi society; this is the one Typhon Pact book to really deliver on the series premise and explore an alien society, doing the kind of thing that I think Zero Sum Game aimed for but missed by using infiltration, as well as by using a pair of Tzenkethi cops.

I'm not sure this series really accomplished its aims on the whole, but this novel did, demonstrating (like Struggle Within) the worth of the concept was there, even if the execution was often lacking.

Continuity Notes:
  • Glinn Dygan, a minor protagonist here, originally appeared in Plagues of Night; I kind of suspect he was created by McCormack for Brinkmanship and seeded back into the earlier novels.
  • There's weirdly little direct references to the earlier Typhon Pact books; the whole time the Federation is trying to defend their skepticism toward the Tzenkethi to the Venette, I kept expecting someone to mention the time the Typhon Pact powers conspired to, I dunno, blow up Deep Space 9!? That might make a little caution justified on the part of the Federation.
Other Notes:
  • This is really the only book other than The Struggle Within to take the idea (from A Singular Destiny) of an expanded Khitomer Accord seriously; we get to see what it's like for the Federation, Cardassians, and Ferengi to all work together in common cause, something unimaginable a decade prior. (And still pretty difficult to pull off!)
  • Picard might not be a viewpoint character, but McCormack writes him some good Patrick Stewart speeches anyway.
  • The excerpts from the output of the Venette syndics are touching, and effective in making you fear for this never-before-mentioned race.
  • I think one chapter of this book gave Sam Bowers more personality than all previous Aventine-focused novels put together.
 
I'd be curious to know what other people think of the Typhon Pact series. Did it work for you? What were its weakest and strongest installments?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top