• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Re-Watching DS9

The headache's gone, I watched "Knives" again just now, and here are my thoughts below.

"Knives" (B5 S2E16)

I'll start with the B-Plot first and then go into the A-Plot.

The B-Plot: Some weird space energy creature travels from a dead alien to inside Sheridan and he starts seeing things. Sounds like an X-Files episode, even though it's not. Sheridan sees where his wife died, even though he wasn't there, he sees his parents... and he also sees some funky creature that looks like it belongs in Gremlins! Nice puppet work there.

Garibaldi has to make sure Sheridan does anything stupid when he heads on out to Sector 14 on his own. Here's my opening to say that looking at the back of his head, you can tell that Garibaldi is really Gari-balding now! It didn't jump out to me before this episode.

One more thing to say about the B-Plot. Sheridan plays baseball! Go figure. Sisko, Sheridan... I guess if you're in command of a space station, you play baseball. I like the makeshift baseball field on the station. They don't have holodecks/holosuites on Babylon 5, so nice to see that, in-universe, an actual mock-up baseball field was built on the station. Although, confession time: I'm not a baseball fan. I'm not a fan of sports in general. Still, though, I can appreciate the passion for the game, and I do like when someone goes out of their way to recreate something.

The A-Plot: Urza, a fellow Centauri and a friend of Londo's from way back has been condemned, he and his family are in danger because he knows the Narn didn't start the Narn/Centauri War and he opposes Emperor Cartagia.

Even though Londo is concerned that Urza is too close to the truth, he still wants to help Urza, and here you can see inner-struggle within Londo: the help those who have been part of his life or to stay true to the course of his future? He tries to have it both ways, by trying to appeal to Lord Refa to help Urza, but Refa doesn't want to do that and Urza is outraged that Londo even approached Refa. Londo is stuck between a rock and a hard place. Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't.

It's something that doesn't make sense to me, but I'll still go along with it, Urza challenges Londo to a sword fight, and by slaying Urza, Londo inherits Urza's family and they now fall under his protection? If I were Urza's family, I wouldn't want protection from the guy who killed Urza, but different culture. I don't have to understand it. All that matters is it works for them.

Vir tries to be Londo's conscience, but to no avail. Londo says there's no way out for him and he must continue on his path. Londo, Londo, Londo.... He seriously strikes me as someone who can't take initiative on his own and needs to have a desnity to guide him. He doesn't stand his ground against what's wrong, if said wrong thing benefits him. He throws up his hands, goes along with it, and maybe he might feel bad, but it doesn't change anything.

I would say that Vir is moral, Refa and Cartagia are immoral, and Londo is amoral.

Overall: The A-Plot is obviously better than the B-Plot, the latter of which is just easily digestible fluff (and why I covered it first). In the main story, we see just how much Londo can compartmentalize his actions and how he'll always go with the path of least resistance. He gives in to all of his temptations. If I have to land on a final rating for the entire episode, I'll go with a 7.

The A-Plot is an 8 and the B-Plot is a 6. It feels like two episodes that have nothing to do with each other were jammed together into one.
 
Last edited:
Knives really is like two episodes for the price of one, with the A plot and B plot being entirely unrelated in story, themes, characters, everything. Larry DiTillio must have had a lot of stories he wanted to tell in this universe, so it's a bit of a shame that this is his last one. From this point forward Babylon 5 is a TV series written by a single author (with one exception in the last season).

Anyone who was worried that B5 was going to completely ignore the story of Babylon 4 disappearing into a time rift must have been really relieved to see the rift make a return here one year later as a space ghost disposal bin. There wasn't really much else that grabbed my interest in the B-plot though.

I'm glad Vir stuck around as we need him as a reminder that there are some Centauri that actually have a conscience, even if we rarely see them. Though we got one of the best Centauri here, as Urza Jaddo makes the choice to stand against Refa. Unfortunately Londo doesn't think he has any choices himself, and I suppose he's not entirely wrong seeing as everyone plays him in this story. He can't even murder his friend without it being a clever scheme by the victim. You'd hope he'd at least learn from this tragedy that he needs to start playing this game properly and stay informed about what the other players are up to, because he can't afford to keep making mistakes like this. He doesn't have many friends left to lose.

Personally I gave this a 6, but that's basically the same as a 7.
 
I don't feel like watching "Parturition" (VOY) next. Can you blame me? Jealous Neelix drives me up the wall. So which one should I put on next?

"In the Shadow of Z'ha'Dum" or "Hippocratic Oath"?

Actually, the Hell with it. I'll do both tomorrow. A double billing!
 
"In the Shadow of Z'ha'Dum" (B5 S2E17)
This isn't the best episode of B5 I've seen up to this point, but it is one of my favorites. Morden is back. Morden was on the Icarus, the same ship Sheridan's wife was on, when it was destroyed. Legally declared dead. Sheridan is FURIOUS and eventually puts two-and-two together that Morden may have been responsible for the Icarus destruction and his wife's death. Sheridan's determined to bring Morden to justice.

This is a Sheridan who's determined, on a mission, and anything in his way is collateral damage. Bruce Boxleitner got to act the Hell out of this episode. Sheridan in this episode is like Janeway in "Equinox, Part II". Full-on bad-ass mode. That's not all. We also get to see how everyone else acts around Sheridan while he goes over the edge.

Garibaldi tells Sheridan he can't hold Morden forever without a charge. Sheridan doesn't care. If Morden is "dead", then it doesn't matter how long they hold him. Talia tells Sheridan she'd do a mind-probe of Morden, due to legalities. Ivanova tells Sheridan she'll have to report him if he steps over the line, even though she doesn't want to. Franklin tells Sheridan that as a Doctor and a Captain respectively, they can't solve everything, even though they want to.

Sheridan's having none of that shit. So Garbaldi temporarily resigns because he doesn't want whatever happens to happen on his watch. Morden becomes a symbol of everything Sheridan's lost and what he stands to lose. His wife, his career and, as it turns out, an ancient war.

This feels like a real Turning Point in the series. Kosh and Delenn explain to Garibaldi about why Kosh's identity must remain hidden, that they don't want to re-ignite the Shadow War yet, and Sheridan wants Kosh to train him to be at the point where he can fight in it.

So, not only is Sheridan part of an underground resistance to the corrupt Earth government, he's also preparing to fight in the Shadow War in secret. A lot of extra-curricular stuff going on underneath Sheridan being Captain of Babylon 5. I like it!

Before, I'd expect the very next episode to follow up on this, but now I know better. I've acclimated. This is '90s TV, not 21st Century TV. So, I figure the next episode won't follow up with any of what's happened, but I look forward to when it finally is followed up on again. Overall, I give this episode a... screw it, I'll go with a 10.

Like I said, it's one of my favorite episodes. We'll see if I still feel that way when I re-watch the entire season for the Season Review but, right now, that's where I am.
 
Last edited:
Talia slapping Sheridan was richly deserved.
Too bad I can only give this post a like once!



One more thing I have to say about "There All the Honor Lies", two more things I have to say about "In the Shadow of Z'ha'Dum"... and then it's on to DS9 for "Hippocratic Oath".

"There All the Honor Lies" --> It always catches me off guard that most Minbari view Delenn as an outcast. Then I have to remind myself that they view her as an abomination and will only be civil towards her at best. Which says a lot about how open-minded Lennier is, considering Delenn's change doesn't change how he views her or treats her.

"In the Shadow of Z'ha'Dum" --> Vir thinks Morden is complete scum and tells him outright. But to his professional credit, he never tells Sheridan what he thinks of Morden and keeps his opinions to himself. Interesting to note here, because I don't know for sure, but I personally think it's only a matter of time before he's no longer quiet about it. Don't tell me!

Morden has always seemed like way too big of a deal to be confined to just the Londo side of the story and the Minbari/Narn side. I think it was crucial that they turn Morden into Sheridan's enemy as well, especially if Morden is this big of a deal. It puts the main conflicts of Babylon 5 into sharper focus and organizes them in way that we can see which things to connect to what and which conflicts are larger scale than others.



"Hippocratic Oath"

I can see why they aired "The Visitor" immediately after "The Way of the Warrior". Whoever was in charge of scheduling wanted to start off the fourth season with the heavy hitters. "Hippocratic Oath" definitely isn't that.

The A-Story is a look at how Bashir and O'Brien respond to a Jem'Hadar threat so differently, and how the lead Jem'Hadar is so different from those following him. Bashir is sympathetic towards the lead Jem'Hadar, who's overcome his addiction to Ketracel White, while the Jem'Hadar under him are hardliners who ultimately don't want to be cured and go soft. O'Brien is also a hardliner who understands that no all the Jem'Hadar are going to act the same way as their leader, who they'll no longer follow by the end. They show the galaxy isn't the way Julian and the lead Jem'Hadar want it to be.

If I have to take a side, I have to side with O'Brien. The other Jem'Hadar are just as determined to be the Federation's enemies as they ever were, white or no white. In that situation, it's Us or Them. It's as simple as that.

The B-Story has Worf complaining about Quark. At this point for me, after having re-watched TNG a few times and doing this thread with the earlier seasons of DS9, I'm back to it feeling weird that Worf is on DS9. Just like in 1995. But the fact that my mind is telling me "he doesn't fit in!" works to the episode's advantage. Worf doesn't see a big picture. He only things about what's immediately in front of him. Odo is like Batman. He sees the larger picture, plans, has backups, and has backups for his backups. He's constantly observing and isn't going to tell anyone his plans.

Worf botches Odo's investigation where he was trying to bust up a smuggling ring that he criminal was Quark was dealing with works for. Instead, Odo can only arrest the middle man because Worf gets in the way. I'm glad that Worf learned his lesson quickly from this experience and Sisko gave him that pep talk about "shades of grey". Worf is having to learn a whole new language when it comes to DS9.

One other thing: Bashir was totally trying to get O'Brien in a "gotcha!" trap when he was trying to get O'Brien to say he wished Keiko were more like a man. :devil:

Overall though, "Hippocratic Oath" is just standard fare caught between two DS9 giants, so I give it a 7.
 
Too bad I can only give this post a like once!



One more thing I have to say about "There All the Honor Lies", two more things I have to say about "In the Shadow of Z'ha'Dum"... and then it's on to DS9 for "Hippocratic Oath".

"There All the Honor Lies" --> It always catches me off guard that most Minbari view Delenn as an outcast. Then I have to remind myself that they view her as an abomination and will only be civil towards her at best. Which says a lot about how open-minded Lennier is, considering Delenn's change doesn't change how he views her or treats her.

"In the Shadow of Z'ha'Dum" --> Vir thinks Morden is complete scum and tells him outright. But to his professional credit, he never tells Sheridan what he thinks of Morden and keeps his opinions to himself. Interesting to note here, because I don't know for sure, but I personally think it's only a matter of time before he's no longer quiet about it. Don't tell me!

Morden has always seemed like way too big of a deal to be confined to just the Londo side of the story and the Minbari/Narn side. I think it was crucial that they turn Morden into Sheridan's enemy as well, especially if Morden is this big of a deal. It puts the main conflicts of Babylon 5 into sharper focus and organizes them in way that we can see which things to connect to what and which conflicts are larger scale than others.



"Hippocratic Oath"

I can see why they aired "The Visitor" immediately after "The Way of the Warrior". Whoever was in charge of scheduling wanted to start off the fourth season with the heavy hitters. "Hippocratic Oath" definitely isn't that.

The A-Story is a look at how Bashir and O'Brien respond to a Jem'Hadar threat so differently, and how the lead Jem'Hadar is so different from those following him. Bashir is sympathetic towards the lead Jem'Hadar, who's overcome his addiction to Ketracel White, while the Jem'Hadar under him are hardliners who ultimately don't want to be cured and go soft. O'Brien is also a hardliner who understands that no all the Jem'Hadar are going to act the same way as their leader, who they'll no longer follow by the end. They show the galaxy isn't the way Julian and the lead Jem'Hadar want it to be.

If I have to take a side, I have to side with O'Brien. The other Jem'Hadar are just as determined to be the Federation's enemies as they ever were, white or no white. In that situation, it's Us or Them. It's as simple as that.

The B-Story has Worf complaining about Quark. At this point for me, after having re-watched TNG a few times and doing this thread with the earlier seasons of DS9, I'm back to it feeling weird that Worf is on DS9. Just like in 1995. But the fact that my mind is telling me "he doesn't fit in!" works to the episode's advantage. Worf doesn't see a big picture. He only things about what's immediately in front of him. Odo is like Batman. He sees the larger picture, plans, has backups, and has backups for his backups. He's constantly observing and isn't going to tell anyone his plans.

Worf botches Odo's investigation where he was trying to bust up a smuggling ring that he criminal was Quark was dealing with works for. Instead, Odo can only arrest the middle man because Worf gets in the way. I'm glad that Worf learned his lesson quickly from this experience and Sisko gave him that pep talk about "shades of grey". Worf is having to learn a whole new language when it comes to DS9.

One other thing: Bashir was totally trying to get O'Brien in a "gotcha!" trap when he was trying to get O'Brien to say he wished Keiko were more like a man. :devil:

Overall though, "Hippocratic Oath" is just standard fare caught between two DS9 giants, so I give it a 7.
Isn't this the episode where Odo at one point reads off Worf's "greatest hits" list? That was both hilarious and kind of painful to watch.
 
Too bad I can only give this post a like once!



One more thing I have to say about "There All the Honor Lies", two more things I have to say about "In the Shadow of Z'ha'Dum"... and then it's on to DS9 for "Hippocratic Oath".

"There All the Honor Lies" --> It always catches me off guard that most Minbari view Delenn as an outcast. Then I have to remind myself that they view her as an abomination and will only be civil towards her at best. Which says a lot about how open-minded Lennier is, considering Delenn's change doesn't change how he views her or treats her.

"In the Shadow of Z'ha'Dum" --> Vir thinks Morden is complete scum and tells him outright. But to his professional credit, he never tells Sheridan what he thinks of Morden and keeps his opinions to himself. Interesting to note here, because I don't know for sure, but I personally think it's only a matter of time before he's no longer quiet about it. Don't tell me!

Morden has always seemed like way too big of a deal to be confined to just the Londo side of the story and the Minbari/Narn side. I think it was crucial that they turn Morden into Sheridan's enemy as well, especially if Morden is this big of a deal. It puts the main conflicts of Babylon 5 into sharper focus and organizes them in way that we can see which things to connect to what and which conflicts are larger scale than others.



"Hippocratic Oath"

I can see why they aired "The Visitor" immediately after "The Way of the Warrior". Whoever was in charge of scheduling wanted to start off the fourth season with the heavy hitters. "Hippocratic Oath" definitely isn't that.

The A-Story is a look at how Bashir and O'Brien respond to a Jem'Hadar threat so differently, and how the lead Jem'Hadar is so different from those following him. Bashir is sympathetic towards the lead Jem'Hadar, who's overcome his addiction to Ketracel White, while the Jem'Hadar under him are hardliners who ultimately don't want to be cured and go soft. O'Brien is also a hardliner who understands that no all the Jem'Hadar are going to act the same way as their leader, who they'll no longer follow by the end. They show the galaxy isn't the way Julian and the lead Jem'Hadar want it to be.

If I have to take a side, I have to side with O'Brien. The other Jem'Hadar are just as determined to be the Federation's enemies as they ever were, white or no white. In that situation, it's Us or Them. It's as simple as that.

The B-Story has Worf complaining about Quark. At this point for me, after having re-watched TNG a few times and doing this thread with the earlier seasons of DS9, I'm back to it feeling weird that Worf is on DS9. Just like in 1995. But the fact that my mind is telling me "he doesn't fit in!" works to the episode's advantage. Worf doesn't see a big picture. He only things about what's immediately in front of him. Odo is like Batman. He sees the larger picture, plans, has backups, and has backups for his backups. He's constantly observing and isn't going to tell anyone his plans.

Worf botches Odo's investigation where he was trying to bust up a smuggling ring that he criminal was Quark was dealing with works for. Instead, Odo can only arrest the middle man because Worf gets in the way. I'm glad that Worf learned his lesson quickly from this experience and Sisko gave him that pep talk about "shades of grey". Worf is having to learn a whole new language when it comes to DS9.

One other thing: Bashir was totally trying to get O'Brien in a "gotcha!" trap when he was trying to get O'Brien to say he wished Keiko were more like a man. :devil:

Overall though, "Hippocratic Oath" is just standard fare caught between two DS9 giants, so I give it a 7.
Might have been an interesting story to have a group of renegade Jem Hadar who don't need White setting up their own underground. Kinda sorry they didn't pursue that.

When O'Brien is trying not to say that he wishes Keiko were a man, is there anyone else who gets the "Why Can't a Woman Be More Like a Man?" song from My Fair Lady running through their heads?
 
If I have to take a side, I have to side with O'Brien. The other Jem'Hadar are just as determined to be the Federation's enemies as they ever were, white or no white. In that situation, it's Us or Them. It's as simple as that.
I reckon viewers wound up instinctively agreeing either with O'Brien's hardline stance or Bashir's more open minded approach. I assume most viewers probably sided with O'Brien.



"Hippocratic Oath" is one of my favorite DS9 episodes. There is so much about the A story that intrigued me.

The setup and setting of the story -- the crew forced to crash land on a remote mysterious jungle planet, with no one coming to the rescue -- instantly hooked me in.

Of course, the story just gets better. There are plot turns and twist in store.

For me, another thing working in the episode's favor is that I usually enjoy Trek stories that feature renegade colonists, or settlers, that don't conform to the society that they come from. The Jem'Hadar that Bashir and O'Brien encountered are, in many ways, like a group of renegade settlers.

Goran'Agar, the leader, was like no other Jem'Hadar that any DS9 crew had ever come across before. And that also happens to be the twist in the plot.

They wanted out of the Dominion because they wanted to free themselves from their lives as slaves of the Founders. We hadn't seen that before. An independent minded Jem'Hadar is such an intriguing element of the story.

To top it all off, of what is already an engaging plot, is the clash between the two best buds.

It was fascinating to see Bashir's and O'Brien's distinct personalities come into play in the conflict. I guess it should not have been surprising that the intellectual medical officer chose to stay, even at the risk of his own life, to help Goran'Agar find the answer to his unusual circumstance; while the hardheaded noncom soldier wanted nothing more than to just get the hell off the planet in one piece.

Btw, I felt more sympathetic to Bashir's point of view. "There are larger issues here", as Bashir said to O'Brien.

Even though I completely understood O'Brien's attitude, I couldn't fault Bashir for seeing the positive possibilities and far-reaching implications that could result from finding the answer to this mystery.

It should be noted that Bashir told O'Brien that O'Brien could leave without him.

Also, I simply wanted to know the answer to why Goram'Agar was the way that he was, which is another reason I sided with Bashir. I wanted Bashir to succeed.

Ultimately, O'Brien didn't respect the chain of command nor Bashir's judgment. But they did get out alive.

The story had a sort of a bittersweet ending.

AFAIK, there was never a follow-up to this story. I would like to think that after the Dominion war ended, Bashir revisited the planet to find out what happened to Goran'Agar.



As for the B story, it was a great B story.

This post is running long, so I am just going to say that I am glad that Worf got humbled.

"Hippocratic Oath" has two excellent stories with fantastic character moments. This isn't an epic type of episode. But for me, it is an underrated gem.
 
^I think there's a story in one of the anthologies that does pick up on this, and specifically addresses the ensuing rift between Bashir and O'Brien that somewhat annoyingly doesn't appear onscreen.

I agree with you that O'Brien disrespected Bashir both personally and professionally in the episode. I think it could also be argued that Bashir's approach is more true to the higher ideals of Trek, while O'Brien's mght be more true to the more nuanced views that DS9 tended to lean into.
 
^I think there's a story in one of the anthologies that does pick up on this, and specifically addresses the ensuing rift between Bashir and O'Brien that somewhat annoyingly doesn't appear onscreen.

I agree with you that O'Brien disrespected Bashir both personally and professionally in the episode. I think it could also be argued that Bashir's approach is more true to the higher ideals of Trek, while O'Brien's mght be more true to the more nuanced views that DS9 tended to lean into.
Thanks for the info. I just looked it up. The story is called "Broken Oaths".

I am just as interested in reading about what happened to Goran'Agar after the events of "Hippocratic Oath". But I couldn't find anything.

I read that the actor who played Goran'Agar is the same actor who played Tosk in "Captive Pursuit".

As you know already know, Tosk was a mysterious alien from an unknown species from the Gamma Quadrant. And O'Brien kind of befriended Tosk. O'Brien saw Tosk as an individual, regardless of the hostility the DS9 crew encountered with the other members of Tosk's species later in the episode.

Now that I am thinking about it. It seems somewhat ironic that in "Hippocratic Oath", O'Brien couldn't even fathom that Bashir, or anyone else, could find common ground, let alone befriend, an individual Jem'Hadar namely Goran'Agar.

Granted the Jem'Hadar are the Federation's foes, but O'Brien couldn't see beyond that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkt
Now that I am thinking about it. It seems somewhat ironic that in "Hippocratic Oath", O'Brien couldn't even fathom that Bashir, or anyone else, could find common ground, let alone befriend, an individual Jem'Hadar namely Goran'Agar.

Granted the Jem'Hadar are the Federation's foes, but O'Brien couldn't see beyond that.
The thing is, as a pragmatist I can see where O'Brien was coming from...I just can't quite bring myself to agree with his decision. But O'Brien's never really been much of an idealist. If it had been someone else...

It's another decision where there's no clear right answer, because we have no idea whether Bashir succeeding would have ultimately been a net positive or negative for Our Heroes.
 
ok i want to rant on an episode i just watched

there is a pattern i noticed with the episodic formula, it was there on tng and its there on ds9, in which there is an episode with such a good writing and a terrible ending. and the reason for the terrible ending in most cases is the end of the runtime. now this episode was a masterpiece until the very dissapointing and ilogical ending. tom riker (will clone or whatever he is) is doing all what he does. kidnapping kira, the defiant, etc. and then they offer him a deal. instead of a death sentence (something he was ready to do anyway) a life sentence in a labour camp, under the cardassians, the most evil race (exluding the borg maybe) in the trek universe.

why would he happily surrender to that? who will not prefer death over it? why? because he may think that maybe he would escape later? maybe he would and then it would be spoilers for me. but anyway. how he can be sure of that? its very unlikely that he will do. so in the end kira franch kiss him and tell him they would come and save him? whut? this isnt will riker. thats a terrorist who kidnapped her. why the hell she even kiss him? because he decided to surrender then hes suddenly the good guy? then immidiatly the episode ended. it shows that the episodic formula not always working and sometimes you do need a dual episode story. this is one of them. what should have happen is that he demanded getting a trial by the federation and then obviously he will not get life in a labour camp. the cardassians are tough bunch they wouldnt agree to it obviously. but at least they needed to write it so they had no choice and had to accept this deal by sisko. it would make sense much much more.

again. good episode, but ruined by a terrible ending
 
You're right about O'Brien. He was never an idealist.

O'Brien's conduct in "Hippocratic Oath" was, for the most part, true to form.

The problem was that O'Brien disregarded Bashir's authority. O'Brien had the attitude that he knew better, which is fine. But at the end of the day, after the arguments are made, it was Bashir's call to make.

Whether Bashir's decision was wise or not is another issue. In any case, we will never know, because he wasn't able to implement the decision. But it does give viewers something to think and debate about. :)

When I give this matter more thought (I probably have given it too much already:mad::confused:), I think maybe Bashir should have brought O'Brien up for disciplinary action. What O'Brien did wasn't frivolous. I don't mean just the insubordination, but also taking into account the context of the situation in which it happened. Serious stuff was going on.

But it wasn't Bashir's style to do so. I completely understand. And there was a friendship at stake. O'Brien got away with impunity. I don't blame Bashir for feeling bitter and for feeling disrespected.

When I get the chance, I will read "Broken Oaths" to see how Bashir and O'Brien reconciled.
 
ok i want to rant on an episode i just watched

there is a pattern i noticed with the episodic formula, it was there on tng and its there on ds9, in which there is an episode with such a good writing and a terrible ending. and the reason for the terrible ending in most cases is the end of the runtime. now this episode was a masterpiece until the very dissapointing and ilogical ending. tom riker (will clone or whatever he is) is doing all what he does. kidnapping kira, the defiant, etc. and then they offer him a deal. instead of a death sentence (something he was ready to do anyway) a life sentence in a labour camp, under the cardassians, the most evil race (exluding the borg maybe) in the trek universe.

why would he happily surrender to that? who will not prefer death over it? why? because he may think that maybe he would escape later? maybe he would and then it would be spoilers for me. but anyway. how he can be sure of that? its very unlikely that he will do. so in the end kira franch kiss him and tell him they would come and save him? whut? this isnt will riker. thats a terrorist who kidnapped her. why the hell she even kiss him? because he decided to surrender then hes suddenly the good guy? then immidiatly the episode ended. it shows that the episodic formula not always working and sometimes you do need a dual episode story. this is one of them. what should have happen is that he demanded getting a trial by the federation and then obviously he will not get life in a labour camp. the cardassians are tough bunch they wouldnt agree to it obviously. but at least they needed to write it so they had no choice and had to accept this deal by sisko. it would make sense much much more.

again. good episode, but ruined by a terrible ending
Tom Riker sacrificed himself so the rest of the Maquis on the ship wouldn't die with him. It was very much in character of Riker, whether it's Will or Tom. (Particularly after knowing about the Pegasus incident.)

I don't think that's a bad ending for the episode at all. I do wish we got to see him again, though.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top