Patrickivan
The nacelle revision looks good, personally I think it could be a tiny touch longer in the back. Peronally, I think be better to use the grille (magnatomic flux-chillers) design similar to that used on the old D-7 design. I'm also wondering about the front of the nacelle. The D-4 design has kind of a slanted leading-edge (from the profile it is kind of swept) -- it would look more aggressive.
BTW: You do plan to cover up the whole bridge section (the lower rear section is kind of uncovered and kind of clunky looking), right? Also when do you plan to add the chine to the sides of the bridge-section.
The nacelle revision looks good, personally I think it could be a tiny touch longer in the back. Peronally, I think be better to use the grille (magnatomic flux-chillers) design similar to that used on the old D-7 design. I'm also wondering about the front of the nacelle. The D-4 design has kind of a slanted leading-edge (from the profile it is kind of swept) -- it would look more aggressive.
BTW: You do plan to cover up the whole bridge section (the lower rear section is kind of uncovered and kind of clunky looking), right? Also when do you plan to add the chine to the sides of the bridge-section.