• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Question about the 2010 series. BIG SPOILER

Steven Moffat is firstly a very experienced TV writer and producer who comes across as extremely articulate and intelligent in interviews and commentaries, and secondly a lifelong Doctor Who fan who knows that the secret of its longevity is that it has never tried to replicate a particular casting success by casting the same type twice.

And he thinks James Nesbitt has acting talent; which doesn't exactly fill me full of confidence for his casting ability.

Well I happen to agree with him on that one. You may not like Nesbitt (and I think he can be a bit smug sometimes) but the guy clearly has talent. If you didn't like him in Jekyll then check out his portrayal of grief in the final episode of Cold Feet, for example.

Starkers, do we know for certain that PD is his favourite Doctor? He's certainly very fond of him but Davison was arguably the last iconic Doctor of the old series before its popularity started to decline, as far as the mainstream audience was concerned, and is the only one of the surviving past Doctors (bar McGann, whose return wouldn't have carried the same weight) who still looks more-or-less like his Doctor. C Baker and Sly McCoy wouldn't have had the same impact, and Tom doesn't look recognisable as the fourth Doctor anymore. Although they explained Davison's ageing, he still looks very much like the same man he was 25 years ago, ie still slim and still very youthful-looking for his age, so that all you really needed was a throwaway line referencing his appearance. They could have approached Tom Baker and still given the same "time differential" explanation for his aged appearance, but while that would've been satisfactory enough in story terms it arguably wouldn't have had the same impact on the viewers.

Also, if PD is his favourite Doctor, that certainly gives me hope that he's not likely to cast a Tennant-alike next time. StCoop, I believe James Nesbitt has already dismissed claims that he's taking over the role, so you've got nothing to worry about there. :lol:

I read an interview with SM where he basically said Davison was the best actor to play the Doctor,you can also tell how from the heart various bits of Time Crash are, he seems to prefer an all action youngish Doctor. Happy for someone to offer contrary evidence but that's been my interpretation of various things he's said.
 
Sci, Don't get me wrong, I'm not biting my fingernails at the notion of Moffat replacing Tennant with Tennant lite or anything I just have a minor worry that the next Doc will be a little too similar...by the same token I guess you could argue that in the past some Doctor's haven't been similar enough. Though I think people did warm to him, Davison after Baker must have been a shock to some people (but not as much as Baker after Davison!!)

BTW I pretty much agree 100% with your feelings about Tennant. To be honest I think he was a year or two too young when he started in the role, but he really has grown into it. I still think he needs to be reigned in to get the best of him, and I'd agree that Eccleston was a much better age to play the Doctor.
 
I think Moffat taking the reigns will keep DT onaboard for at least one more season though I do think Moffat will be ithcing to create his own Doctor sooner rather than later since he wants to take the franchise away from the RTD road and have it more darker.
 
I do think Moffat will be ithcing to create his own Doctor sooner rather than later since he wants to take the franchise away from the RTD road and have it more darker.

I don't think Moffat has categorically stated that has he?
 
I do think Moffat will be ithcing to create his own Doctor sooner rather than later since he wants to take the franchise away from the RTD road and have it more darker.

I don't think Moffat has categorically stated that has he?

No, he hasn't. He hasn't categorically stated anything except "No comment." Hasn't stopped people speculating, and I don't think he really thought it would.
 
From what he has said, those wanting every episode to be a gothic horror fest will be very disappointed.
 
And he thinks James Nesbitt has acting talent; which doesn't exactly fill me full of confidence for his casting ability.

Well I happen to agree with him on that one. You may not like Nesbitt (and I think he can be a bit smug sometimes) but the guy clearly has talent. If you didn't like him in Jekyll then check out his portrayal of grief in the final episode of Cold Feet, for example.

Starkers, do we know for certain that PD is his favourite Doctor? He's certainly very fond of him but Davison was arguably the last iconic Doctor of the old series before its popularity started to decline, as far as the mainstream audience was concerned, and is the only one of the surviving past Doctors (bar McGann, whose return wouldn't have carried the same weight) who still looks more-or-less like his Doctor. C Baker and Sly McCoy wouldn't have had the same impact, and Tom doesn't look recognisable as the fourth Doctor anymore. Although they explained Davison's ageing, he still looks very much like the same man he was 25 years ago, ie still slim and still very youthful-looking for his age, so that all you really needed was a throwaway line referencing his appearance. They could have approached Tom Baker and still given the same "time differential" explanation for his aged appearance, but while that would've been satisfactory enough in story terms it arguably wouldn't have had the same impact on the viewers.

Also, if PD is his favourite Doctor, that certainly gives me hope that he's not likely to cast a Tennant-alike next time. StCoop, I believe James Nesbitt has already dismissed claims that he's taking over the role, so you've got nothing to worry about there. :lol:

I read an interview with SM where he basically said Davison was the best actor to play the Doctor,you can also tell how from the heart various bits of Time Crash are, he seems to prefer an all action youngish Doctor. Happy for someone to offer contrary evidence but that's been my interpretation of various things he's said.

Fair enough. :) Now that you mention it, I think I actually read that one too, where he said Davison was "the first of the modern Doctors". Personally, my favourite of the old series Doctors is Tom Baker, but I can see Moffat's point that Davison was the best actor to play the role. I happen to think Troughton and Pertwee were on a par, mind you, but I see where he's coming from. I wouldn't say a younger Doctor constitutes all-action though. I like how PD played the role as a young man trapped in an old man's body, frustrated that no one took him seriously.

Although Davison still holds the yougest Doctor record, Tennant is the first time that the role has ever been played so young. I'm not sure that another young actor would automatically equate to another manic "dashing about", rate-of-knots delivery interpretation. :)
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top