So Catherine would be a Princess, but not a Princess of the Blood.
Not until William bites her. Then their Vampire lineage can continue
So Catherine would be a Princess, but not a Princess of the Blood.
So Catherine would be a Princess, but not a Princess of the Blood.
Not until William bites her. Then their Vampire lineage can continue
So Catherine would be a Princess, but not a Princess of the Blood.
Not until William bites her. Then their Vampire lineage can continue
But would they sparkle?
In other news from 1947, I hear the Empire is planning to finally grant India independence.![]()
Some things never change.
You're right, Baba O'Riley, it makes much more sense if she was a plant sent to romance him during his time in university as part of some sort of Truman-Show-esque scheme to develop a relationship with him and take nine years for it to result in a marriage proposal.
I feel sorry for this chick because the press is going to hound her and try to mold her into another "Princess Diana". They will see her as filling the void Diana left when she died and will scrutinize her and hound her the same way they did Diana.
I really hope they make it together because I like Prince William and I hope she becomes her own person and doesn't do things in order to encourage the media's "Diana Fetish"
I hope he is never King and that we get rid of them well before that time.
Nobody should be born with no chance of being anything other than being rich and people to do everything for you.
I am with the Bishop of Willesden.
I don't fully understand being American, but isn't their role in your government entirely ceremonial? Aren't they just rich with some historical gravitas?
They are not vampires. They are werewolves.Not until William bites her. Then their Vampire lineage can continueSo Catherine would be a Princess, but not a Princess of the Blood.
Their power is now entirely that of ceremony and tradition, yes. British government doesn't really work like yours - in the US, what is written is what happens. Here, what is done is what happens, if that makes sense. 'Tradition' is almost inseparable from law. The concept of 'common law', i.e. that's-just-the-way-we-do-things is more wide ranging than merely criminal law here.
Technically, the law is enacted by the Queen and enforced in her name and under her devolved authority. In reality, of course, Parliament writes the law and then the agencies of the Home Office and the Department of Justice enforce it. But every law still goes through the process of getting 'royal approval', and offenders are still tried in 'Crown Court' and sent to 'HM Prison Service'. The military and police swear allegiance to the Crown but actually follow the Ministry of Defence and the Home Office respectively.
The monarch is, if you like, a symbol of the nation of the United Kingdom contained within one person. The embodiment of the state. But because of many centuries of shifting influence, the actual power no longer lies with the technical 'head' of government.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.