It is a real crime and he is a real criminal if proved true. Just because you don't agree with the law, that doesn't make it imaginary.
It may not make the law imaginary, but it also doesn't make an idiotic law any less idiotic.
Same response applies: Just because you don't agree with the law, that doesn't make it imaginary
or idiotic.
It's
monumentally idiotic. $$Millions$$ wasted anually on a "war on drugs" that has made absolutely zero impact on usage, price or availability.
Take the money spent on the war on drugs and the money spent on pot (the country's largest and most profitable cash-crop), and by legalizing it, you take all of that money and (by spending the "war" money elsewhere and taxing the product itself) put money back into tax-payer pockets.
In this current economic climate, wasting $$millions$$ on a "war" that will
never be won is, as said earlier, idiotic. Monumentally so.
It is also monumentally hypocritcal. Everything that is said about pot ("it's addictive", "it's a gateway drug") is far moreso true about both alcohol and tobacco. Alcohol and tobacco have been proven to be far more deadly and addictive than cannibis, yet somehow they remain socially acceptable. In fact, the major supporters of continued prohibition (and prohibition has always been
soo successful in America

) have been the alcohol and tobacco industries.
If smoking pot makes one a criminal, then more power to them, as they'll be in good company. America was founded by people who were considered criminals by the royalty back "home". Rosa Parks was a criminal. Nelson Mandela was a criminal.