I want backstory. And, without trying, sexism exists in the 22nd, 23rd, and 24th centuries.
Janice Rand is a female Yeoman.
"What's the matter, Jim, don't trust yourself?" She is later assaulted, as is another in "Shore Leave."
"The women!"
Troi has a mother annoying Picard with emotion. In the same type of situation as Rand, Beverly Crusher practically does a lap dance on Picard, begging him to satisfy her "needs" and Tasha Yar does the same. But, at least Tasha is talking about emotional connection, not physical needs. The only relationship to power (Picard, Riker) is to sleep with it. Troi has to be lectures about making sacrifices, by Riker, when taking an exam on Command. Crusher kisses, marries, and divorces Picard is the celebrated Series Finale.
"Can you feel me, Imzadi?"
Troi is a counselor, Beverly a doctor. Caring fields. Tasha is killed of like 18 episodes into its run to be replaced by Worf, the most Macho of the TNG characters. Fights. BDSM. Hookup that leads to a son. Violence.
Behind the scenes, Terry Farrell's makeup was changed because it "ruined her looks." Pulaski was on the show because Gates McFadden left the show over sexist concerns. The catsuit Jeri Ryan wore, caused her to pass out 8 times in three weeks because it restricted her breathing in 12-15 hour days. Jolene Blalock was put in a catsuit, rubbed down with gel, in the series premiere of Enterprise. 2002. In 2009 and 2012, two actresses had to give mission briefings in their underwear, on-screen.
So, sexism exists, already. Since it began with number one, I want her to tackle it, head-on, in Star Trek. Just writing better characters doesn't admit that Star Trek, fanboys cultures, and those position of power in 2019, are guilty of being less than egalitarian.
She is capable. But, I want the characters around her, to not see it because of her being a woman. In backstory.
Does that make sense?