• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Poor Olympics Broadcast

Ometiklan

Captain
Captain
Anyone beside me think that NBC's presentation of the Olympics is really poor this year?

I am not talking about the issues of delaying coverage to prime time, or inserting those somewhat hokey personal stories right in the middle of more exciting competition, what I am talking about it more about the basic presentation of the material.

Some examples:
- In the women's gymnastics all around yesterday it didn't seem like they were putting up much of a story. I think I remember from when I was a kid the competition between the US and whoever our rivals were that year (generally Russia, and later China) were told compellingly. There was actual excitement built in the presentation of the events and scoring that you hung on the next event to see who would lead. There was a little of that near the end of yesterday, but not enough.

- In many events, the scoring or relative positions of the athletes are not well depicted. I have noticed this in basketball (where the score, time, shot clock, etc. are not displayed for minutes on end), gymnastics (in multiple events including the final of the all around, some of the gymnasts' scores were never shown. I don't think I ever saw the final Russian girl's score that left her with silver, and only later saw the board with the bronze and 4th place scores.), and in multiple other events (for example in swimming or rowing, they only indicate the event length at certain intervals, so if I just tuned back in I don't know for long periods what event I am looking at). It isn't like graphics or bugs are hard to do or would get in the way - they have been standard for decades now - is it so hard? Who is running this stuff?

- Replays have been especially poor or infrequent. Yeah, DVR helps with seeing something again, but in most cases it won't let me see different angles. The replays have been very few and far between, especially in basketball. Almost like a bunch of amateurs are filming everything. I understand that there are a lot of events that need to be covered, but if NBC or BBC or whoever can't provide the coverage in all the events, maybe the contract should be shared around a bit. Also, despite having hours (5 or 6 at least, and up to 12+ hours in many cases) between when an event occurs and when it is shown in primetime you would think there would be plenty of time to put together a good edit of the event. Also, very rarely are any controversial calls by the officials shown in a replay; presumably NBC is just following their unofficial policy of NBA coverage where they rarely show anything that would put the officials in a bad light (i.e., lets show the boring layup from the last time down the court rather than reviewing the potentially blown foul call that just happened).

- Speaking of editing, just because the sport is happening in cold, rainy London and the women aren't wearing only their skimpy regular bikinis, that doesn't mean I don't want to see the second set of the US vs. Austria beach volleyball. NBC returns us to the game like, "oh, so you might have been worried for a second about the American's possibly losing. Forget that, they won the second set in a cruise and now are going to finish this puppy off." I guess their motto is 'Who needs suspense anyway?'

Anyway, anyone else think the coverage/presentation is poor? Or good? What other examples have you noticed?
 
Bear in mind that the broadcasters, NBC, BBC, whoever, don't control the live broadcast or graphics. What is shown of the events themselves is dictated by the olympic broadcasting team themselves. It doesnt answer every problem, but it does explain some of the frustrating decisions on what to show, lack of replays, etc. For example, yesterday when the GBR womens team sprint were disqualified, there was no replay available so the viewer never got to see what the problem was, and the coverage continued with the next race. The BBC feed had to cut to their own interview team so they could try and explain verbally what had happened.
 
I guess it depends on where you're watching it as the quality of the reporting can vary very much, and if there isn't much backstory, I'm guessing they're using the world feed which is the raw footage which they would normally fill with commentary. For all I've heard of NBC, they seem rather disinterested in showing the Olympics as an experience and instead are treating it just like any other sports event. I think it should be given more respect than that. The location of where you're watching from is also important, in that depending on where you live, you might have coverage on multiple channels, each covering different things like they are in Canada with CTV and TSN.
 
I have given up watching on NBC-the coverage has been atrocious. (Check out twitter, #NBCfail for their latest screw-ups...) I knew right off the bat after the opening ceremonies, NBC was going to present the Olympics as a sports-based reality show instead of an international competition.

A few tips for NBC, since they'll be broadcasting the Olympics through 2020: I love that Team USA is doing so well, but come on, NBC show more than a total of five gymnasts for the women's all-around gymnastics event! We know there were 24 women competing! I haven't seen a medal ceremony yet, with a non-American winning gold. Or how about showing the scores, once in a while. That would be great! And for the love of all things holy, don't spoil races with your own promos for the Today Show.

Oh, and please, for those of us who don't have cable, maybe provide a way to watch online without having a cable subscription? I'd have paid to have a high-quality stream of LIVE events. But no, it's crappy streaming, especially of the events they're 'saving' to play during primetime, and they're stuffed with incessant ads and commercials.

I've had a grudge with NBC since they cancelled Law and Order and the whole debacle with Conan O'Brien. They can't redeem themselves in my eyes.

On a happier note, thank goodness for Firefox Foxy Proxy! :techman:
 
Is it my imagination or did NBC not show any of the rings routines for men's gymnastics? Okay if they don't want to show all of them or even most, but if rings still exists (and I did see it in the background), show a few, at least!
 
From what I've heard. NBC or someone horribly cut the opening ceremony


Honestly I would recommend all you Yanks to just watch the opening in full from Youtube or what have you considering all the horror stories I hear about NBC cutting, random advert breaks, or jumping around on cameras without rhyme or reasons.

It was a great opening all around, from start to finish and all the music in-between, but it needs to be watched in full, without stops.

- 15 minute coverage of one table tennis between China VS China before ending coverage for the night.


-SPOILERS!

They claim they don't to spoil anything but then they show the medal count.
 
I have been a little annoyed with the switching back and forth from one even to the next, never really covering one in full. Also, the random commercial breaks, sometimes right in the middle of, say, a gymnastics routine, is really bizarre. There's no warning---it just cuts without so much as a "We'll be right back."
 
Apart from some of the inane nattering the commentators carry out on some of the events and the inability for one too pronounce my girlfriends cousins surname (which they share and is Cuddihy if anyone wondered) in the womens 400m, I've not really had any problems with the Beebs presentation of the games, there's round-the-clock coverage on BBC One, Two, Three and an additional bucket load of extra digital channels.

While stumbling earlier, I did find this article on the Hollywood Reporter's website which some might find interesting.

It really does sound as if NBC have dropped the ball regarding the coverage, what they do with the coverage is their business though. It does seem they're treating their viewers as simpletons.
 
Despite some buffering issues, I've really enjoyed watching the olympics online. That's how I've watched most of the Swimming and pretty much all the Gymnastics. Something I noticed was that on NBC (And we can go on and on about the tape delay coverage, which in the West Coast always happens, even if the olympics are TO THE NORTH OF WHERE YOU LIVE IN THE SAME TIMEZONE) there is just too much bias going on for my tastes. Of course it's always been like that, but it seemed like the emphasis was a lot more this year and I started finding it annoying.

On the Online broadcast, they show the events, and the commentators (Mostly on the Gymnastics and Swimming) are not bias and you see a whole lot more. Still, I wish the coverage availability of the Olympics would be a lot better than it is. We live in 2012, the age of instantaneous media coverage and twitter, and NBC chooses to hang on to old values and the casual viewer by tape delaying everything. Oh, and if the demographic is older folks, why do they hold all the great stuff until the very end, which is like 10:30, 11:00 at night.

Despite that, I'm still amazed the ratings are so high, but I really wonder something. If they gave people a CHOICE and actually aired things live (And people can use DVRs or something) and then repeated the highlight package in primetime, would that really have a drastic change in ratings?
 
Can someone explain to me why NBC just doesn't show the entire thing 24/7 until the whole thing is over with? Wouldn't they get much better ratings that way?
 
Can someone explain to me why NBC just doesn't show the entire thing 24/7 until the whole thing is over with? Wouldn't they get much better ratings that way?

I know they try to optimize viewership for the prime time slots but the one that really boggles me is the *NBC SPORTS CHANNEL* doesn't show Olympics 24/7. You'd think if anything would it'd be that.
 
NBC thinks making the audience wait until US prime time will get the maximum amount of viewers. Odd thing is they could probably do both live and run it in prime time and make even more money.
 
Tell me they covered the swimming properly. The Americans ROCKED at the swimming. They blew everyone away. Michael Phelps. Greatest Olympian ever.
 
Can someone explain to me why NBC just doesn't show the entire thing 24/7 until the whole thing is over with? Wouldn't they get much better ratings that way?


Somehow they seem to feel that their regular daytime programming is more important than an international event like the Olympics. I think they're nuts. They have the best opportunity of funneling viewership to times that some maybe otherwise wouldn't watch NBC, yet they're holding back. Considering how expensive it is to broadcast, you would think they'd want to make the most of it.
 
The BBC is a byword for impartial, objective reportage.

I really hope your country can see this fine example of upholding the tradition.

Please note that one of the commentators is a Mr Michael Johnson of the United States of America.

It also confirms my long held believe that John Inverdale is a pisspoor reporter who doesn't give a toss about sport and is quite possibly an even bigger arse than me.
 
Somehow they seem to feel that their regular daytime programming is more important than an international event like the Olympics. I think they're nuts. They have the best opportunity of funneling viewership to times that some maybe otherwise wouldn't watch NBC, yet they're holding back. Considering how expensive it is to broadcast, you would think they'd want to make the most of it.
I guess we have things better here in Europe, Olympic broadcast wise at least.
Here in Czech the national broadcaster Česká televize is showing only the Olympics live on two from its five channels.
Sadly I am not so much of an sports fan:shrug:
 
A couple days ago the local NBC news affiliate somehow managed to make both mistakes Jon Stewart complained about last Thursday regarding spoilers on who won what medals each day.

They told you to mute the TV because of spoilers, and then they showed graphics and pictures of who won.

They told you to look away because of spoilers, and then they talked and played clips (with audio) about who won.

The most amazing thing is that they managed to commit both these errors in different segments of the same broadcast. It was a stunning display of journalistic stupidity, and the last time I watched the news before the primetime Olympic coverage aired. They totally blew the surprise on a couple of Phelps' medals.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top