Saito S, I'm just saying: you're letting yourself in for a big ol' can o' worms here...!
Oh, I know.

I wouldn't make these huge long posts if I weren't prepared for the consequences. haha
But really, I find this whole discussion pretty interesting.
Because if they can kill off the main character of Voyager, then I guess it will be very easy to waste more of them if some "effect" is needed.
But what makes you think that that will actually
happen? "if they can kill" "then I guess it will be very easy" "if some 'effect' is needed". Even your own words sound pretty vague about the subject. There is nothing to suggest that anyone else will die just because Janeway died. This is essentially like declaring all automobiles of any make and classification to be grossly unsafe and poorly made due to the safety problems identified specifically in SUVs.
And the information that "all he main characters are in the book" is wrong. Kes and Neelix are missing.
Well, ok. I figured that it would be assumed that I meant "everyone but the characters who had been previously established as no longer being on the ship."
I don't doubt that the people I'm arguing with are or at least have been fans of the different TV series as well, otherwise they wouldn't have start treading the books from the start. But sometimes I get the impression that they are more fans of the authors and what they might come up with than for example Voyager or different Voyager characters. They won't mind if some author they like kill off the entire Voyager crew to get an effect.
As for people wanting the stories to be as close to "real life" as possible, just read through the threads in which the "Janeway case" are debated. I've seen a lot of such references.
To both of these points, I can only conclude that you've been reading different threads than me. I have not gotten any of the impressions you have gotten, certainly not in THIS thread, where a large number of the people who have been arguing with you (myself included) have gone out of our way to point out that we
like Janeway and Voyager. I for one would be absolutely flabbergasted if they "killed of the entire Voyager crew to get an effect." Of course, they would never DO such a thing: they do like it when people buy their books. By even suggesting that they would ever kill off the entire cast for some cheap effect, you are really being unfair to the authors, IMO.
As for "a lot" of such references to people wanting the stories to be as close to real life as possible... again, not in this thread. LOTS and LOTS of references to the fact that having someone like Janeway die
adds an important element of realism to the story, an element which some of us feel is sometimes lacking in Trek. But no references that -
in general - Trek needs to think more about being realistic. Advocating for the presence of one element of realism does not mean I want to see Trek re-invent itself to be more realistic on all fronts.
To clarify, since I didn't include your quote of my own post: this was in response to me saying that TrekLit has not set itself down this path toward a fiery pit of darkness and despair just because Janeway died.
And... am I sure? That's it? That's all you have to say about it?

Yes, I am. Quite sure. I have read a handful of Trek books as of late (including
Before Dishonor itself), and I can say with certainty that the overall feel that permeates all of the books I've read is no more dark and no closer to "Death Trek" (or whatever you were calling it before) than the average level of the TV shows themselves. There is nothing about BD (certainly not the death of a main) that is
new to Trek. Granted, I have a lot yet to read, but from what I have heard from people who have read the books I haven't (
Thrawn on
Destiny, for example), I have no reason to suspect my impression will change as I read more of the books.
Yes I am, or more correctly, I used to be. With the current development of Star Trek in general and the Voyager relaunch in particular, I'm actually happy that the character is left out of the ongoing storyline.
So... you were upset at the Pocket Books editors and authors for not including characters that had been dropped by the TV show producers, before said show went off the air.
Never mind. I'm leaving this particular point alone. I don't want to try and make sense of it.
And as long as there are people like Margaret Clark and the Trek authors that post in this forum I for one will continue to express a dislike of the direction and the content of Trek books and the way Voyager characters are treated in them. You can't disrespect a large segment of the fandom and expect them to be silent.
Brit
I still don't see how anyone has been
disrespected. I can understand being upset, and wanting to vent, and... well, ok, I don't really "understand" the notion of swearing off TrekLit due to one character death, because I wouldn't do it, but I can respect that. It's a personal decision. If Janeway's death means you cannot enjoy Trek book anymore, so be it.
But, disrespected? Do you really believe that the authors and editors were sitting around, rubbing their hands together with glee, thinking about how
awesome it was that all these Janeway fans were about to get blindsided? The decision to kill her was a creative one, a dramatic one, not a spiteful one. You may or may not agree that it was done well, and are free to be of the opinion that it shouldn't have happened at all. But no one has "disrespected" anyone, and they don't owe anyone an apology.
It just makes me crazy when Trek keeps old characters together for ridiculous periods of time. I suspect they do so because of us fans, but I really wish they wouldn't. Thanks but no thanks.
And this is why I feel that the Voyager crew SHOULD be broken up. Not entirely, mind you, but the starship Voyager shouldn't continue on this many years after the TV series with ALL of it's original mains. Especially not if they are really heading back toward the DQ for further exploration. There would be at
least one member of the main crew (especially when you consider that a bunch of them weren't even Starfleet officers, per se) who would never want to go near the DQ again.
And to anyone who might ask why I say this of Voyager, but give TOS a free pass: I'm not. I agree with the sentiment that the length of time that the TOS crew served on the same ship was insane (especially after a certain point, where like ALL of them were Commander rank or higher). The only one which made sense was
Undiscovered Country, because they kind of made it a point in that movie that the crew - having been split apart and with several of them on the verge of retirement - were being brought back together for this last, crucial mission. But some of the previous movies... yeah, it was kinda ridiculous.