How so?
PRO-Starfleet uses the AGT commbadge and AGT-like uniforms in 2384 while the PIC flashbacks to 2385 still use the FC commbadge.
How so?
Either that or the Ascension class. I'd have to see it myself to be certain.There's also a model of a three-nacelled Constitution (Federation-class dreadnaught?) at the bar.
How so?
Budget: new designs cost way more than repurposing existing ones.
The blue glowing part is animated now, suggesting that warp plasma is coursing through them.
Budget: new designs cost way more than repurposing existing ones.
On Lower Decks we see that starfleet use different designs of badges concurrently.PRO-Starfleet uses the AGT commbadge and AGT-like uniforms in 2384 while the PIC flashbacks to 2385 still use the FC commbadge.
Yeah, that they sold or even destroyed most of it when Enterprise wrapped is appalling, as it was obvious that while that streak of Star Trek was over the show would be back sooner than later in a form or another.That's how they made the old Trek films so cheaply (relatively speaking). They had an entire warehouse of props, costumes, etc going all the way back to the Desilu days to draw upon. They saved even more money by filming on various existing sets when the show they belonged to wasn't using them.
Also, the old and new Enterprises were of roughly the same configuration.At least in TMP the dialogue said the Enterprise was a redesign and refit.
What's going on with the blue glowing sections on the Titan's nacelles? The screenshots look like a texture map that didn't get applied all the way.
I remember fans were even trying to raise funds to pay for storing the Enterprise sets against the day that they could talk the PTB into doing Season 5. But the money men had their spreadsheets that said Trek was dead, so down the sets went and off to the auction house with the archive of assets.Yeah, that they sold or even destroyed most of it when Enterprise wrapped is appalling, as it was obvious that while that streak of Star Trek was over the show would be back sooner than later in a form or another.
So the Enterprise-A was never destroyed! I want to see it back in action someday.
Voyager-B?! Just as we were talking about short-lived starships…
Welcome to Hollywood. Unless you have a guarantee of reuse it is too expensive to store. Even Lucas destroyed many of Episode 1's sets and recreated them digitally for the next film instead of storing.Yeah, that they sold or even destroyed most of it when Enterprise wrapped is appalling, as it was obvious that while that streak of Star Trek was over the show would be back sooner than later in a form or another.
Yes.Are ST: Pic showmaker idiots?
At least they’re not using the Pathfinder class for the Voyager-A in PRO. But showing that there’s already a B only 20 years after PRO means that yet again a brand-new ship will only last a short period of time.
Unless of course if PRO is inconsistent with PIC, which it already shows signs of being, just like all the other shows.
Also…is Bill Krause the only ship designer on that show with any imagination? They use old John Eaves designs, designs from STO, but nothing actually original except for his Shangri-La class which they change to the Connie 3 class.
exactly. But there was also that ship that got to -M and was yet supposed to be the same ship after many refits.I fear that this extends "back" to the 31st-century refit of the Discovery. Us nerds theorized that it was to keep the existence of a temporally-displaced, 23rd-century starship off the official books, but really it's the first example in the current era of production that they've pasted a suffix to a ship during a refit for no in-universe reason.
Mark
I fear that this extends "back" to the 31st-century refit of the Discovery. Us nerds theorized that it was to keep the existence of a temporally-displaced, 23rd-century starship off the official books, but really it's the first example in the current era of production that they've pasted a suffix to a ship during a refit for no in-universe reason.
Mark
exactly. But there was also that ship that got to -M and was yet supposed to be the same ship after many refits.
the second defiant kept the São Paulo registry. Unfortunately they reused plenty of shots from previous episodes, so it ALSO shows up with the one of the first Defiant, but that’s clearly an error.But in the case of USS Defiant for example, when the ship was destroyed and then the name replaced that of the Sao Paolo, no new suffix was added.
The Tikhov:Which ship was that?
In fairness, yes, that should be possible (Assuming the vessel in question was never destroyed in active service and it just continued to be refit/redesigned during relevant periods throughout history and passed on to new crews until it got to the M version).
Welcome to art. Art is about feeling not logic.The show's producers and writers seem to be churning out new ship designs just because they feel like it.
Nothing wrong with that. They just dont't want to.What's the problem is just saying on-screen for a few seconds that the original ships got an internal and external upgrade because of integration of new technologies (such as the one from the Borg)?
All my doctor's, dentist, and other medical offices my head shots are easily 10 years old.Picard calls up Crusher's most recent Starfleet medical profile, which calls up a TNG series headshot, blue uniform and all. May not be as current as one thinks.
Welcome to art. Art is about feeling not logic.
Nothing wrong with that. They just dont't want to.
They do. It's a post-scarcity world. They can replace whatever they damn well please.Within the scope of Trek that's more science fiction based, art should have been used to reflect a more sensible/logical setting
Yes, of course. But, what I am saying is many artists will do things due to the emotion it provokes, not just a logical thing. At least, the artists I know. Your art is your art and Star Trek is a whole bunch of other people's art. I don't expect nor demand people conform to my opinion on art.Not quite accurate, since there IS a pattern to art.
Makes sense to me. Starfleet decides to recycle ships faster because they can.Hence my issue with how they move forward - aka, it doesn't make sense.
Ok, so it's not practical...and? I'm seriously struggling at this point because I don't watch this fictional universe for practicality!or Pic is severely out of sync with the rest of the Trek canon and SF is just now replacing ships every 20 years (which makes no practical sense within the Trek universe as such).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.