Were you able to recover the data yet?
The latest word from the data recovery firm now that they've actually laid hands on the failed drive is that they've seen this type of failure before and have had success at 100% recovery. They said we should know the final outcome by the end of next week.
This is great news. Backups notwithstanding, it must put everyone's mind to rest to not have to redo all the data ingest.
As for "Kruge," that is a terrific make-up job. Thank your gods that it is not the real thing, since Nimoy's BTS stories all indicate that Lloyd was very difficult to work with; understanding neither Star Trek nor his character, and generally unable to take direction.
I understand that Cawley's hair is required to stay Elvis-y as part of his professional commitments. So what is Rice's excuse for the "non-reg" hairdo? I can see how producers might decide it's OK to keep it long since they think they're replicating what "might have been" in the late '60s/early '70s. But even given that assumption, a longer look would be trimmed, shaped and blow-dried. For an example, I offer the crewman in The Motion Picture who Spock takes out with his neck pinch. That fellow had long hair (for Starfleet) which was shaped in the perfect 1970s style, as was his mustache. But no shagginess in the back or over the ears. A shame to get the sets and costumes so perfect, but then pull me out of the Trek universe because someone couldn't bother to get a haircut.
Well, you've hit on a few of the important factors regarding Bobby Quinn Rice's hairstyle:
1. Peter Kirk's hair only seems out of place and "non-reg" in a 20th or 21st century military service outfit; we really don't know what hair styles will be acceptable in a 23rd century Starfleet. How did you find out what the regulations will be 200 years from now to be able to determine that Peter's is "non-reg?" (Example: When I look at 18th and 19th century naval hairstyles, they are pretty long.)
2. If you give Peter shorter hair, the hairstyle begins to look military instead of pseudo-military. (The term Roddenberry used was actually "semimilitary.") So, we need to find ways to reinforce the "semi-" part and not the "military" part. Hair that would be inappropriate for the 20th or 21st centuries might therefore be the exact kind of thing you would want to rely on to convey that the organization merely a "futuristic" semi-military organization.
3. Janice Rand's crazy basketweave beehive is also out of place in a pseudo-military service outfit but most people don't complain about that (although a few do).
4. Walter Koenig had to wear a wig for his first few episodes while his "non-reg" longer Beatle-style hair grew in. So, the "new young character that kids can relate to" whether he's in 1967 or 2007, always needs to have an appropriate hairstyle so that, well, the kids can relate to him.
5. When we changed our moniker from "New Voyages" to "Phase II," we decided to adopt many of the art designs from the ill-fated 1970s Phase II series. This includes the costumes, some props, some sets (if and when we get to them) and, yes, even the 1970s hairstyles. Peter Kirk's hair faithfully recreates hairstyles seen on the men in screentest footage shot for the original Phase II series. The hairstyles will be one of the ways we try to "recreate" the Phase II series instead of just recreating TOS. So Bobby has Phase II '70s hair instead of '60's TOS hair. It's a shorthand way of conveying that this isn't exactly your father's TOS Star Trek. (We gave Scotty a "non-reg" moustache, too.) If it pulls you out of the same ol' TOS Trek universe, excellent. That's part of the point. As for "not bothering" to get his hair cut: you assume too much. In real life, Bobby does not keep his hair this long and he grows it out at our instruction. I'm sorry if our creative decision doesn't work for you.
6. Peter's heart isn't really in Starfleet in many ways and we need a quick way of showing that rather than saying that in dialog. He's ambivalent about being there and, as we've seen, he came on board the Enterprise mostly to be with Lt. Alex Freeman. Giving Peter longish hair is an intentional way of showing that he's not really toeing the Starfleet line.
7. After five episodes with Peter's long hair, I believe we'll find that it's no longer really working for Peter--and as he grows up and he finally takes his position and responsibilities in Starfleet more seriously, he'll be adopting a more "appropriate" hairstyle to convey that he's really, finally joined the team. So, shortening his hair is something we'll probably rely on in our next episodes.
Last edited: