I was just reading this article
So I am asking people here to tell me if they could leave their pets behind if they had to evacuate, or would you stay behind to look after your pets? Do you think pets should be included in government evacuation plans?
andThe idea of leaving a child behind when you are evacuating your home because of an impending natural disaster is beyond comprehension.
For many people, the idea of leaving a loved pet behind because the evacuation centre will not accept animals has recently put them in the same quandary.
Rather than leave their pet dog or cat to fend for itself in the face of an impending flood, cyclone or other disaster, people have chosen to stay in their homes and place their own lives in danger to save their animals.
The Australian Companion Animal Council is calling for pets to be included as a normal part of evacuation procedures.
and"But, ironically, in not allowing pets into evacuation centres, people's lives are being put at risk. We simply have to include pets in evacuation procedures."
SOURCEAfter Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in 2005, the US House of Representatives passed the Pets Evacuation and Transportation Standards Act.
It requires states wanting federal emergency assistance to include pets and service animals in their plans for evacuating residents.
So I am asking people here to tell me if they could leave their pets behind if they had to evacuate, or would you stay behind to look after your pets? Do you think pets should be included in government evacuation plans?