• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Paramount apparently still doesn't get it...

I think Stamets/Culber is the best relationship in all of Trek. Simply presented as pure love - the fact that they’re two men is totally irrelevant as far as how it’s portrayed.
I agree. It's one of the most realistic relationships in Trek too, despite Culber being resurrected (it's Trek.. who HASN'T died a time or two) and Stamets having a bit of tardigrade DNA here and there. They have their problems but they work it out.
 
These new shows are desperately trying to ACT like they're SOOO tolerant, by shoving as many minorities and LBGTQ characters everywhere, even in situations that make no sense, and focusing heavily on writing dialogue that makes it VERY apparent just how LOVING and TOLERANT of minorities they are, but this simply is so obvious to someone who looks and reads between the lines. It's obvious the writers and showrunners want to get credit and act like they're totally liberal, even if it may be possible that deep down, secretly, they may be not.

When you're trying to see offense to this degree, it might be time to turn off the TV and go outside for some fresh air. People who are hired to write, write for modern young audiences, because that is generally what makes production companies money. The original Star Trek was adopted by a largely young, liberal crowd and that is where it makes its money.

It all comes back to The Simpsons'...

Grandpa Simpson said:
“I used to be with ‘it’, but then they changed what ‘it’ was. Now what I’m with isn’t ‘it’ anymore and what’s ‘it’ seems weird and scary. It’ll happen to you!
 
Fwiw, the intentional capitalization of key words and repeating of key phrases is a known propaganda tactic and social manipulation technique.

It’s very curious that the poster in question is using them and those techniques
 
Fwiw, the intentional capitalization of key words and repeating of key phrases is a known propaganda tactic and social manipulation technique.

It’s very curious that the poster in question is using them and those techniques

Just throwing everything at the wall AND hoping something will stick.
 
In 2017, gay rights were established already. Most people knew of the plight of the LGBTQ and it was a given that people would show their support and understanding of them. Therefore not including them especially in trek, would look bad. But then there's also going overboard with it, and that betrays the true reason of their inclusion.
Well thanks for confirming that our “plight” is “known” and that televising us is some kind of unnecessary social obligation.

You genuinely have no idea how offensive it is to have one’s existence be just something that is tolerated as long as it doesn’t go “overboard”.
 
Well thanks for confirming that our “plight” is “known” and that televising us is some kind of unnecessary social obligation.

You genuinely have no idea how offensive it is to have one’s existence be just something that is tolerated as long as it doesn’t go “overboard”.

Some have no idea what struggles people face and lack any kind of empathy.
 
by shoving as many minorities and LBGTQ characters everywhere, even in situations that make no sense
uhhhh... I'm very confused....what are situations in Star Trek where LBGTQ+ and minority characters supposedly "make no sense"?
I'm hard pressed to think of any situation where a LGBTQ+ or minority person would make no sense, as a gay person I'd say we make sense existing everywhere where straight people exist.
Okay, I suppose except maybe at some a meeting of some right wing anti-LBGT organization....but how many of those happen in Star Trek?

There is no situation in Star Trek where a LGBTQ+ or minority character would be out of place.
 
Fwiw, the intentional capitalization of key words and repeating of key phrases is a known propaganda tactic and social manipulation technique.

It’s very curious that the poster in question is using them and those techniques
Long before SM it was the preserve of tabloid news papers also - British tabloids like the "Scum", Star, Mail etc would use the same writing techniques
 
I appreciate the insight, since I don’t follow UK tabloids I wasn’t aware
Aye - I don't know if it is common in other countries but if you want to hurt your eyes, brain, and soul go on the Daily Express and read an article or two and see if it doesn't make you wish to be illiterate.

Guessing the writing approach is less common in other countries written media?
 
Aye - I don't know if it is common in other countries but if you want to hurt your eyes, brain, and soul go on the Daily Express and read an article or two and see if it doesn't make you wish to be illiterate.

Guessing the writing approach is less common in other countries written media?

I’ve not really noticed it outside of headline keywords in American media. Doesn’t mean it’s not used, just I’ve not noticed
 
I’ve not really noticed it outside of headline keywords in American media. Doesn’t mean it’s not used, just I’ve not noticed

Fair enough - with the sheer volume of news media in America due to the size of the country too I'd imagine it is harder to get a cross sectional view of it than in the UK where there are about 8 "main" papers papers at most so fairly straightforward to keep an eye on them all
 
OmvopMJ.gif
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top