• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Oxford Comma?

Do you use the Oxford comma?


  • Total voters
    69
Though I doubt even Americans have attempted peanut butter and Nutella, which is big amongst UK students.
I think Americans prefer nutella and marshmallow fluff instead.
How dare you corrupt the untarnishable splendour of Nutella with such vile substances. Nutella is to be partaken pure and undiluted, so its deliciousness would not be diminished.

Even the use of bread is an unfortunate, but sometimes necessary, addiction.

Well, I'll often just eat Nutella with a spoon, but if I want to put myself in a sugar coma, the fluff comes in. It's essentially a sandwich equivalent of a s'more.
 
What's wrong with s'mores?
Probably nothing, except that they sounds like your teeth would be breaking up upon contact from the sheer amount of sugar in them.

Obviously it's a very personal determination to make, but for me they cross the line from "sweet" to "nauseatingly sugary". Twice. With a somersault.
 
I've adopted it relatively recently; in the last three or four years, I guess. Really, the word "and" provides enough of a pause in its own right.
 
I do not use it because I was taught in elementary school that you didn't need before an "and". It looks awkward to me and I always assume it's poor writing.
This is what I was taught as well.
I can't remember being taught about the Oxford Comma at all. But I do remember a teacher drawing attention to my overuse of commas, once upon a time. He thought it was funny as I was the only kid in the class that remembered to use them at all...

Oh - and peanut butter? Popular over here. I love the stuff.
We may have had the same teacher.:rommie:

As for other punctuation:

Book, television series, movie
[I was taught underline back in the typewriter era]
"Episode", "Article", "Chapter"

He said, "I willingly defy 'the man' at every opportunity."
 
^^ Yup, that's how it's done. And I agree with the quote as well. :rommie:

Yeah, Italics or Underline, with underline being the necessity of a typewriter that has stuck.
I remember having to underline in the typewriter days. I hated that. :rommie:
 
I usually underline because it's what I was taught. Also, fwiw, the same rule applies for court cases, e.g. either Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 37 U.S. 483 (1954) or Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 37 U.S. 483 (1954). Once again, I think underline looks better, but I'm sure it was originally just supposed to be italics.
 
I use the comma, because it looks correct, and properly separates the different parts of the sentence. I think that's how I was taught, but I use it because it looks right anyway.
 
I usually underline because it's what I was taught. Also, fwiw, the same rule applies for court cases, e.g. either Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 37 U.S. 483 (1954) or Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 37 U.S. 483 (1954). Once again, I think underline looks better, but I'm sure it was originally just supposed to be italics.
In newspaper and book publishing, underlining was used in typewritten copy to indicate text to be set in italics. Modern word processing makes the need for underlining obsolete. It looks ugly and amateurish.

YMMV.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top