• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Optimistic Post-Apocalyptic stories

Jericho is a pretty good post-apocalyptic TV series, and it does exactly what you're asking for- how do people pull themselves back together in the months after some apocalyptic event.
 
I've always liked Lucifer's Hammer by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle. It involves multiple pieces of a comet striking the Earth, and a group of survivors struggling to rebuild civilization afterwards.

It's good, but does it really count as optimistic? It got incredibly dark at spots and as I recall ended on a pretty gloomy note.
 
I went and saw "Battle Los Angeles" last night, where the world pretty much gets its ass kicked by a bunch of aliens. Most major cities are leveled, and thousands (millions?) of people are dead. One might consider it a mini-apocalypse, of sorts. Sure, the human race survives, but at what cost?

That said, it ends on a very positive note, and it got me thinking. Are there any positive, optimistic movies/books about rebuilding society after a huge apocalyptic event? Most of the time we see post-apocalyptic worlds where everyone is living is ruin, and there are goofy monsters running around, and everything about it makes the audience want to kill themselves. Is there enough drama to make an uplifting story about a post-apocalyptic world?

Waterworld, kind of
Postman, definately
Independence Day

Deep Impact ends on a happy note.
 
Realistically, the aftermath of ID4 would be the end of the world. All the energy released by those huge spaceships crashing would've been comparable to a series of asteroid strikes, not to mention that the radiation and ejecta from that moon-sized alien base blowing up near the Earth would've probably devastated the planet's atmosphere and killed every last living thing that survived the ship crashes.

Actually, most of the ships were hovering pretty low over the earth so they wouldn't be crashing at very high speed. I doubt the destruction would reach very far from the immediate area. As for the Mother ship, it was seen to be in a pretty high orbit. Radiation from the explosion would be stopped by Earth's atmosphere and magnetic field. Debris might be a problem, it depends on the size of the chunks I guess.
 
Actually, most of the ships were hovering pretty low over the earth so they wouldn't be crashing at very high speed.

Doesn't matter. Momentum is mass times velocity. A huge mass striking at low velocity can cause as much damage as a smaller mass striking at higher velocity.

The fall of each of the World Trade Center towers registered as a 2.1 to 2.3 on the Richter scale, enough to qualify as a minor earthquake. These ships were thousands of times bigger -- at a rough estimate, given the claim that they were 15 miles in diameter, they'd have a volume more than 1.5 million times that of either of the WTC towers. Giant flying saucers are probably made of denser stuff than office buildings, so let's call it 3 million times the mass. And going by publicity photos, let's say their centers of mass were maybe 8 times the height of the WTC's center of mass, which means their velocity at impact would be maybe 2.8 times as great. Momentum is mv^2, that's 24 million times as much momentum upon impact. That would correspond to maybe around a 7 on the Richter scale, on a par with the 2009 Indonesian earthquake -- or, since it's all delivered at the single moment of impact, it would be as much energy as a half-megaton nuclear bomb. And there are 36 of them at once around the world? At the very least that's going to cause nuclear winter, damage the ozone layer, and wipe out a huge percentage of the survivors.


As for the Mother ship, it was seen to be in a pretty high orbit.

It was also said to be a quarter the mass of the Moon, so it should've caused severe gravitational and seismic disruptions just by being there (and could not possibly have been hidden).

Radiation from the explosion would be stopped by Earth's atmosphere and magnetic field.

Not an explosion that size. Not the destruction of something explicitly stated to be the mass of a dwarf planet. An explosion of something that size would be trillions of megatons. The Earth's atmosphere wouldn't be able to absorb such an immense amount of energy without being blown away. Hell, it would probably melt the side of the Earth that was facing it.

Debris might be a problem, it depends on the size of the chunks I guess.

The stated dimensions and mass of the mothership would give it an average density 20 times greater than lead. Since most of it was hollow, it would've had to be made of degenerate matter. The debris would be devastating.

Bottom line, Independence Day is one of the most physics-illiterate movies ever made. There's very little in it that's remotely possible or defensible.
 
Bottom line, Independence Day is one of the most physics-illiterate movies ever made. There's very little in it that's remotely possible or defensible.

LOL, that really annoys you, doesn't it?

Red Matter, protomatter, metaphasic fountain of youth radiation, subspace, dilithium crystals, warp speed, beaming, transwarp beaming and galaxy-threatening FTL supernovae anyone?
 
Actually, most of the ships were hovering pretty low over the earth so they wouldn't be crashing at very high speed.

Doesn't matter. Momentum is mass times velocity. A huge mass striking at low velocity can cause as much damage as a smaller mass striking at higher velocity.

The fall of each of the World Trade Center towers registered as a 2.1 to 2.3 on the Richter scale, enough to qualify as a minor earthquake. These ships were thousands of times bigger -- at a rough estimate, given the claim that they were 15 miles in diameter, they'd have a volume more than 1.5 million times that of either of the WTC towers. Giant flying saucers are probably made of denser stuff than office buildings, so let's call it 3 million times the mass. And going by publicity photos, let's say their centers of mass were maybe 8 times the height of the WTC's center of mass, which means their velocity at impact would be maybe 2.8 times as great. Momentum is mv^2, that's 24 million times as much momentum upon impact. That would correspond to maybe around a 7 on the Richter scale, on a par with the 2009 Indonesian earthquake -- or, since it's all delivered at the single moment of impact, it would be as much energy as a half-megaton nuclear bomb. And there are 36 of them at once around the world? At the very least that's going to cause nuclear winter, damage the ozone layer, and wipe out a huge percentage of the survivors.


As for the Mother ship, it was seen to be in a pretty high orbit.
It was also said to be a quarter the mass of the Moon, so it should've caused severe gravitational and seismic disruptions just by being there (and could not possibly have been hidden).

Radiation from the explosion would be stopped by Earth's atmosphere and magnetic field.
Not an explosion that size. Not the destruction of something explicitly stated to be the mass of a dwarf planet. An explosion of something that size would be trillions of megatons. The Earth's atmosphere wouldn't be able to absorb such an immense amount of energy without being blown away. Hell, it would probably melt the side of the Earth that was facing it.

Debris might be a problem, it depends on the size of the chunks I guess.
The stated dimensions and mass of the mothership would give it an average density 20 times greater than lead. Since most of it was hollow, it would've had to be made of degenerate matter. The debris would be devastating.

Bottom line, Independence Day is one of the most physics-illiterate movies ever made. There's very little in it that's remotely possible or defensible.

If you're going to criticize the physics of ID4, at least get the math correct.

If the ships were 8 times as high as the WTC then they would hit ground at 4 times the velocity(vf^2=vi^2+2ad). Also momentum is MV, not MV^2. So the total momentum would be 12 million times more. Also, any engineer would think about it in terms of potential/kinetic energy, not momentum. Potential energy = mgh. So the ship had 24 times as much potential energy. At impact that all had become kinetic energy.

So your numbers weren't terrible, but the explanations were way off. Which is why writers should either ignore the science and write a good story, or hire scientists to get the science right. Trying to do both ends up looking even worse.


But to get back to the topic at hand, Jericho and Survivors(BBC) both tried to do an optimistic rebuilding of the world story. The problem is both shows got bogged down in the conspiracy theories of the destruction.
 
Sorry, I meant kinetic energy, not momentum. Slip of the tongue. And I got the velocity by d = (1/2)at^2 and v = at. If d/d' = 8 and a is constant, then t/t' = sqrt(8) = 2.8, so v/v' should also be 2.8.
 
This thread got me thinking, does anyone think having a movie about the aftermath of an alien invasion on the scale of what we saw in ID4 or Battle LA would be a good idea?

Realistically, the aftermath of ID4 would be the end of the world. All the energy released by those huge spaceships crashing would've been comparable to a series of asteroid strikes, not to mention that the radiation and ejecta from that moon-sized alien base blowing up near the Earth would've probably devastated the planet's atmosphere and killed every last living thing that survived the ship crashes.

Considering they beat the HIGHLY ADVANCED aliens using a computer virus (created by Earth tech) transmitted from a laptop (also earth tech) realism has already gone out the window by that point.
 
This thread got me thinking, does anyone think having a movie about the aftermath of an alien invasion on the scale of what we saw in ID4 or Battle LA would be a good idea?

Realistically, the aftermath of ID4 would be the end of the world. All the energy released by those huge spaceships crashing would've been comparable to a series of asteroid strikes, not to mention that the radiation and ejecta from that moon-sized alien base blowing up near the Earth would've probably devastated the planet's atmosphere and killed every last living thing that survived the ship crashes.

Considering they beat the HIGHLY ADVANCED aliens using a computer virus (created by Earth tech) transmitted from a laptop (also earth tech) realism has already gone out the window by that point.

Software and hardware of our computer systems were based on what they found in the alien scout, so this isn't too far fetched. The aliens also hacked into Earth's satellites, so Goldblum also had a good starting point there.
 
Considering they beat the HIGHLY ADVANCED aliens using a computer virus (created by Earth tech) transmitted from a laptop (also earth tech) realism has already gone out the window by that point.

I reject your reality and substitute the power of APPLE!!

KNEEL BEFORE JOBS! :klingon:
 
How about the 1970's live-action Saturday morning series Ark II? Like many of the other examples given up=thread, it wasn't really immediately post-apocolypse, but it was definitely optimistic.
 
How about the 1970's live-action Saturday morning series Ark II? Like many of the other examples given up=thread, it wasn't really immediately post-apocolypse, but it was definitely optimistic.

Good example. :techman: And one of my "secret favorites", too.

Damnation Alley (the movie) ends on a sickeningly sweet finale.
The book-not so much.

Where Late the Sweet Birds Sang by Kate Wilhelm ends...optimistically, sort of.

Logan's Run (movie) seems to think it's being optimistic.
The book and its sequel(s) take a more realistic view of the struggle to survive.

Alas Babylon is very optimistic. It actually predicts both survivors and
a winner to the war
which seem somewhat far-fetched, IMO.

I Am Legend-Will Smith's version seems optimistic.

Lucifer's Hammer was just dark, IMO.

Footfall was more optimistic.


The Postman certainly qualifies.

I'm sure others will spring to mind....
 
How about the 1970's live-action Saturday morning series Ark II? Like many of the other examples given up=thread, it wasn't really immediately post-apocolypse, but it was definitely optimistic.

Yeah... from what I remember of it, it was basically a lower-budget Genesis II, with an RV instead of an underground bullet train.
 
How about the 1970's live-action Saturday morning series Ark II? Like many of the other examples given up=thread, it wasn't really immediately post-apocolypse, but it was definitely optimistic.

Yeah... from what I remember of it, it was basically a lower-budget Genesis II, with an RV instead of an underground bullet train.

:)
Yeah, that sums it up more-or-less. It hasn't aged too badly. Picked it up on DVD awhile back (along with Space Academy and Jason of Star Command). Ark II features some pretty intelligently written stories, even though written mainly for children, and some cool guest appearances by Jim Backus and Jonathan Harris, amongst others.
 
How about the 1970's live-action Saturday morning series Ark II? Like many of the other examples given up=thread, it wasn't really immediately post-apocolypse, but it was definitely optimistic.

Yeah... from what I remember of it, it was basically a lower-budget Genesis II, with an RV instead of an underground bullet train.

:)
Yeah, that sums it up more-or-less. It hasn't aged too badly. Picked it up on DVD awhile back (along with Space Academy and Jason of Star Command). Ark II features some pretty intelligently written stories, even though written mainly for children, and some cool guest appearances by Jim Backus and Jonathan Harris, amongst others.

And now I'm off to AMAZON....thanks a lot! :techman:
 
This is just a ST fanfic, but a most excellent one at that. Posted right here on this board. AFAIK, there are plans by its author to turn it into a full length novel.

It is post-apocalyptic in the sense that it's set after Trek's World War III, and a few decades before Enterprise:

First Contact: The Iron Horse
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top