
Judge disses Star Trek icon Data’s poetry while ruling AI can’t author works
Computer scientist won’t give up fight to copyright AI-made art after court loss.

That was indeed speculation the judge cited as a possible future situation. She used it to fortify her decision to deny the current claim.Weird! :0
I thought Data's poem was fun for what it was even if it was objectively a rubbish poem, but I'm biased because I love Data. Either way, I don't think Data's poetry has any place in this court case because Data is:
A) fictional, and
B) sentient. He is a sentient AI, and real life AI hasn't reached that level, and honestly, I don't believe it ever will. So bringing him up in a court case seems pretty pointless to me.
They should have put the AI on trial and then they really could have gone to town.Just shows you, people still say ‘it’s like that Star Trek episode where…’.
In this case, the judge must have been mulling this one over until they came to ‘it’s like that Star Trek episode where Data wrote a poem’.
Honestly, and AI today could do a better job than "An Ode to Spot".I find it weird to cite Data's poem for that purpose.
Obviously, it was written by a human in actuality (AI couldn't remotely write something like that back in 1992), and also, it was meant to be technically 'clever' but still 'soulless'.
Gemini came up with thisHonestly, and AI today could do a better job than "An Ode to Spot".![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.