It honestly doesn't bother me that much, because on a certain level, I get it. They needed to explain how they kept loosing and being ambushed by the Inquisitors on the outside of a pyramid (not exactly a lot of places to hide.) Making the action more elaborate with complicated moving platforms, or have the whole thing break into parts and spin like a giant rubix cube or something would have done the job, but made the action way more involved (and expensive) when the focus needed to be on the character dynamics between Kana, Ezra, & Maul. So: Inquisicopters it is!
Not really. For one thing; why would they suddenly have those having never once ever used them? Second; those would be too effective because now there's no reason why they'd not just fly straight to the top and wait for them there.Mandalorian-style jetpacks. Problem solved.
Meh, at this point the only Mary Poppins tributes I want are the ones with Michael Rooker shouting "I'm Mary Poppins y'all!"I actually enjoyed the little bit of Mary Poppins lightsabers we got. Silly, but cool looking imo
I wish it was. And this is 100% canon by the way.I thought this was a joke, then I googled and...
FFS, what the fuck were they thinking?
They were good, yes, although the previous season was better.Those episodes are so good other than that, so I try to cut the copter-sabres some slack.
naw, it was incredibly stupid.It's a cool visual made for a show aimed at younger viewers. It's not that big of a deal.
Don’t those questions apply to the inquisicopters too?Not really. For one thing; why would they suddenly have those having never once ever used them? Second; those would be too effective because now there's no reason why they'd not just fly straight to the top and wait for them there.
Meh, at this point the only Mary Poppins tributes I want are the ones with Michael Rooker shouting "I'm Mary Poppins y'all!"
I take cartoons to be cartoon depictions of the events. If they were depicted in live action that's not how they would have happened.and remember not to take it all too seriously.
Well, they've had spinning sabres since season 1, no?Don’t those questions apply to the inquisicopters too?
Sure, to a point. The same applies to any medium though from prose, to comics, to videogames. They all have their own quirks and requirements that won't always directly translate between mediums.I take cartoons to be cartoon depictions of the events. If they were depicted in live action that's not how they would have happened.
It's not that big of a deal.It's a cool visual made for a show aimed at younger viewers. It's not that big of a deal.
There are repulsorlifts in the hilt. The blade doesn't generate lift.How would someone experiment with that?
Two contained plasma beams spinning around a central unit. What would it do to the air and could it generate lift? Or would the feedback loop need to be shaped with angled planes to simulate something like a helicopter blade?
Like I said, I don't think they're creating lift at all, just stabilising them on long, slow jump glides on a low gravity, high atmospheric density world. Indeed most of the time we see them using them, they're descending, not ascending, and when they are, it could just be a parabola. I'm going to go on the theory that the times they came out of nowhere, they were scaling up one of those long spires that stick up through the crust since they were the only things taller than the temple, and jumping across.How would someone experiment with that?
Two contained plasma beams spinning around a central unit. What would it do to the air and could it generate lift? Or would the feedback loop need to be shaped with angled planes to simulate something like a helicopter blade?
Right. So... how do Inquisitors not violate that rule, again? They have Force powers. They have red lightsabers. They fight Jedi, and serve the Sith. Are they then not Sith? Are we really to believe that, while they may squabble amongst each other, none of them hope to kill/replace Vader, and become one of Palps' rule-friendly two?The first time we see more than one Inquisitor together in 'Rebels', they immediately start squabbling. Felt pretty consistent to me, and entirely in-line with how a bunch of dark side users would behave. The Rule of Two exists for a reason after all.
some probably would like to, but they know all too well that they got no chance.Right. So... how do Inquisitors not violate that rule, again? They have Force powers. They have red lightsabers. They fight Jedi, and serve the Sith. Are they then not Sith? Are we really to believe that, while they may squabble amongst each other, none of them hope to kill/replace Vader, and become one of Palps' rule-friendly two?
There's more to being a Jedi than robes and a laser sword. Likewise there's more to a Sith than a taste for black outfits and red blades. It takes a level of focus, inner balance, and raw power. Also just as it takes a Jedi to make a Jedi, it takes a Sith to initiate a new Sith. On top of which there's doubtless all kinds of secrets to power that the Master always hordes for themselves, and the apprentice only gets once they finally off them.Right. So... how do Inquisitors not violate that rule, again? They have Force powers. They have red lightsabers. They fight Jedi, and serve the Sith. Are they then not Sith? Are we really to believe that, while they may squabble amongst each other, none of them hope to kill/replace Vader, and become one of Palps' rule-friendly two?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.