I think the DE version TMP corrected a lot of the rough edges. Now if only they would release it on Blu-ray.
-Chris
I just want the Special Longer Version on Blu-ray.
I think the DE version TMP corrected a lot of the rough edges. Now if only they would release it on Blu-ray.
-Chris
..and fanwanked other aspects without much concern for the original intent—which is pretty well-documented.I think the DE version TMP corrected a lot of the rough edges...
BTW, in directional signage from the set of ST II's Academy scenes, sold off in the It's a Wrap! eBay auctions, Xon is given an office. So... he may still be around!
..and fanwanked other aspects without much concern for the original intent—which is pretty well-documented.I think the DE version TMP corrected a lot of the rough edges...
Wise financed the DE, so he would have signed off on everything.
I've got a stupid question: why is the DE not available on blu-ray?
I've got a stupid question: why is the DE not available on blu-ray?
The special effects were only rendered at 480i.
I've got a stupid question: why is the DE not available on blu-ray?
The special effects were only rendered at 480i.
since I'm not a technical guy, I assume that means they can't adapt them to a better resolution/format/whatever blu-ray technically means in comparison to a DVD?
The special effects were only rendered at 480i.
since I'm not a technical guy, I assume that means they can't adapt them to a better resolution/format/whatever blu-ray technically means in comparison to a DVD?
Essentially all the effects shots would still look like the DVD.![]()
Well he seems quite proud of the Director's Edition in the booklet for the DVD. Certainly he makes it sound like he oversaw the whole thing.but is there any objective evidence of his participation beyond that?
I agree with Nimoy. TMP is nothing like TOS or the rest of the movies. It is more like a 2001 wannabe.
To say that TMP "isn't Star Trek" when it lifts directly from two or three of the most popular episodes (add with Run Silent, Run Deep and press "PUREE") is a little... Well, illogical.
I enjoy all of the TOS movies. I can watch more of V than I used to be able to and less of VI.
But between I and II I'm set. TMP has all my Corbomite / Changeling / One of Our Planets is Missing wonder and mystery. TWOK has my Doomsday Machine / Where No Man Has Gone Before / Ultimate Computer two-fisted action.
These are the two TOS movies I watch over and over and over (and over).
In a way TMP was a portent of things to come in popular SF: the idea that situations and characters change and don't remain the same. And that may be part of what bothers some people. They wanted the TOS characters and their situation to be exactly as it was in TOS. But Roddenberry and Wise opted to acknowledge the fact the cast (and thus the characters) had visibly aged. In extent the situation had changed as well.
Yet by the end of the film things have reverted pretty much back to the status quo: the familiar crew were back in their comfortable places, in sync with each other and set for new voyages to the final frontier.
Then TWOK resets the circumstances again. But this time none of it really rings true. The characters are now significantly older and yet they're all trying to fit in together again. And they're no longer on the final frontier. Instead they're training cadets to take their place.
For me it doesn't get back to be (somewhat) familiar Star Trek until TFF even as disappointing as that film is. But even then there's the taint of everything thats happened in TSFS and TVH---after all that it really beggars credibility that they should all end up together again as if nothing has happened.
For me TMP really is the last time we see our heroes even remotely as we remembered them in TOS albeit with a brief period of being out-of-sync with each other.
I've addressed this a number of times before. Regardless of what Wise signed off on in the DE, I have interviews with Wise from right after TMP was released where he says rather bluntly the things he would have done if he'd had a chance to tighten the cut, and the DE isn't it. He said he would cut the film by 15 minutes—at minimum. Clearly he wasn't happy with the pacing of the theatrical release. The DE is a bit tighter, but not tight enough, and certainly not tight in the way Wise wanted it when interviewed in 1980.Wise financed the DE, so he would have signed off on everything.
No way Wise personally financed the DE; Paramount did.
My understanding is that the DE was primarily Fein and Matessino's baby. Beyond them approaching Paramount (for the money) and Wise (for his imprimatur), I've never been clear on the extent of Wise's day-to-day involvement in the DE project. With all due respect to Robert Wise, he suffered a stroke not long before the DE project and, although he seemed to retain his faculties until his death in 2005, that had to curtail his participation in the project. No doubt he issued some notes, screened and approved the final cut, and recorded the commentary (where the effects of the stroke were clearly evident in Wise's speech) but is there any objective evidence of his participation beyond that? Sure the DE team had access to the original storyboards and notes to recreate the original intent as well as possible, but that's pretty far from Wise punching a clock daily on the project.
I'm not trying to take the piss out of the DE, which I rather like overall with some reservations. I don't find it the night-and-day revelation that many do; most of the pacing, perceived slowness (the DE is actually longer), and stilted performances (Shatner's wink and "Oh my God!" are notable omissions) of the theatrical cut are still present. But I think it highly unlikely that Wise wanted the TOS Galileo shuttlecraft inserted into Starfleet HQ or the shots of Decker and Ilia flirting moved to the Enterprise departure scene.
I compare the TMP DE to the Superman II: Richard Donner Cut, where Donner (obviously still bitter about his ouster from that production 25-30 years later) agreed to sign off on the final product but entrusted the project to Michael Thau, with results much more wildly uneven than the TMP DE. These direct-to-video projects were cash-in opportunities (the TMP DE almost certainly sold better than the theatrical cut would have on DVD), not bonafide "restorations" and should probably be viewed with that in mind. Worthy projects but let's not delude ourselves into believing that these are the films that would have been released in 1979.
I have said it before, but I don't think the really heavy criticism of TMP came around till '83 when TMP was shown on the ABC Sunday Night Movie.
All I can say is that was not my experience at the time, and you couldn't tell it by ticket sales figures.
No, it's not. Sure it can be as simple as perception, but it actually accomplishes most of what it sets out to do.I think the simpler explanation is that TMP is just a lousy movie.
And yet the film made decent money and is one of the better performing films in the franchise.I have said it before, but I don't think the really heavy criticism of TMP came around till '83 when TMP was shown on the ABC Sunday Night Movie.
No. It was immediate and widespread upon the film's initial release in 1979.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.