Star Trek is a niche television show for geeks. It's sci-fi at its best (and, at times, its worst) and targets a very specific and loyal audience.
Coming off of Star Trek Wars Into Reference, I don't care about the masses or what they think, fuck them, make a show for Star Trek fans...
Except for the fact that Meyers put a little twist on the star trek formula that everyone loved (Navy in space!). That's not the classic star trek, wheres the decentralization of command structure? (No reports to Starfleet) where's the wild west swashbuckling in space? Not to mention that Meyers has said his favourite star trek is ds9 (you can look it up). The star trek series with the most believable and realistic characters ,relationships and villains. BUT let's ignore that, I don't know if you've ever seen Hannibal, but uhhh...there's nothing typical about it. You can call the visuals, symbolism, and cinematography down right art work. Not things star trek is exactly known for. So what do we have here? Meyers, a man who over thirty years already decided he didn't like certain things and changed them while respecting the show. Fuller, a star trek aficionado who is an autere with a genuinely unique voice. No offence but there is no set formula for star trek. Tos, TNG and ds9 outside of being the same universe are completely divorced from each other.I don't get why everyone compares Star Trek to Star Wars.
Star Wars is the classic Hero's Journey, a space opera film franchise that everyone can relate to and enjoy for one reason or another.
Star Trek is a niche television show for geeks. It's sci-fi at its best (and, at times, its worst) and targets a very specific and loyal audience.
You can't expect or attempt to make anywhere near as much money with Star Trek as you can with Star Wars. Making films with dumb writing and KABOOMS! will do nothing but make you a quick buck in the short-term, with the side effect of alienating your loyal fanbase and therefore damaging you in the long-term.
Coming off of Star Trek Wars Into Reference, I don't care about the masses or what they think, fuck them, make a show for Star Trek fans, and if you're successful at it, you will introduce a NEW very specific group of loyal fans like TNG did. Now that we know Bryan Fuller is running the show and Nicholas Meyer is writing for it, I'm confident that's exactly what they're doing.
Except for the fact that Meyers put a little twist on the star trek formula that everyone loved (Navy in space!). That's not the classic star trek, wheres the decentralization of command structure? (No reports to Starfleet) where's the wild west swashbuckling in space? Not to mention that Meyers has said his favourite star trek is ds9 (you can look it up). The star trek series with the most believable and realistic characters ,relationships and villains. BUT let's ignore that, I don't know if you've ever seen Hannibal, but uhhh...there's nothing typical about it. You can call the visuals, symbolism, and cinematography down right art work. Not things star trek is exactly known for. So what do we have here? Meyers, a man who over thirty years already decided he didn't like certain things and changed them while respecting the show. Fuller, a star trek aficionado who is an autere with a genuinely unique voice. No offence but there is no set formula for star trek. Tos, TNG and ds9 outside of being the same universe are completely divorced from each other.
Except for the fact that Meyers put a little twist on the star trek formula that everyone loved (Navy in space!). That's not the classic star trek, wheres the decentralization of command structure? (No reports to Starfleet) where's the wild west swashbuckling in space? Not to mention that Meyers has said his favourite star trek is ds9 (you can look it up). The star trek series with the most believable and realistic characters ,relationships and villains. BUT let's ignore that, I don't know if you've ever seen Hannibal, but uhhh...there's nothing typical about it. You can call the visuals, symbolism, and cinematography down right art work. Not things star trek is exactly known for. So what do we have here? Meyers, a man who over thirty years already decided he didn't like certain things and changed them while respecting the show. Fuller, a star trek aficionado who is an autere with a genuinely unique voice. No offence but there is no set formula for star trek. Tos, TNG and ds9 outside of being the same universe are completely divorced from each other.
It is - I must admit I was a bit trepidatious about the new series, but so far every bit of news has been positive.Meyer comeback in Star Trek!? Awesome news!!!
Sure.Does outbursts of joy count? Like in "This side of Paradise." or "Amok Time."?
It's not about egos, it's writing styles that might clash.None of these people have especially big egos do they?
Just asking....
It's not about egos, it's writing styles that might clash.
TNG took a while to find it's footing, though. Will the new series be given that latitude?
TNG took a while to find it's footing, though. Will the new series be given that latitude?
Really? We're now starting to speculate about writing styles clashing?
The whole season? I don't know, he hasn't directed anything since 1999.His best writing assignment was The Voyage Home to me; but I would be stoked he could manage direct all the episodes. If it's limited to 10 or 12 episodes.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.