• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

NFL 2024: Chiefs Kingdom Targets a Three-Peat

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wanted to see what the Ravens fans were saying about Tucker. Apparently there's a massive divide between "he's washed" and "he's the GOAT." Both of those can be true. But I don't understand the fans defending him and getting mad at anyone who dares boo him. Because he was so great for the team all those years, he's allowed to keep missing kicks this year? Are you supposed to cheer his misses? "I'd rather watch Justin Tucker miss four field goals than watch someone I don't care about make four field goals!"
 
Adam Thielen with an amazing one-handed catch on third down to put Carolina in field goal range..... and then Carolina fumbles the ball away on the very next play.
 
Too many self-appointed advocates nowadays. It'll be hard to get past those yo-yos.

Maybe the Washington Blackfeet?
Huh…. That might work, and with minimal adjustments to the fight song. Even has the same amount of syllables. I think a lot more folks could get behind that one. For the ones who can’t, too bad, so sad.
 
Rams win!

Too bad the Jets are so fucking useless.
That’s how I felt about Washington’s win over Tennessee today. A win is a win, but it was correctly predicted to be a cakewalk. Not much of a challenge. The Dallas one should have gone that way too, though. :mad:
 
Do they want to change the name? I've read conflicting stories. One says the new owners know no one likes it. The other says it's a name they're keeping because it honors the military.
 
Mmm... Sounds like they just don’t want to deal with it. Upthread I mentioned that the family of the original artist really wants the old name back, as do a large chunk of the fandom. I personally still call them the Redskins as I’ve been a fan since 1983 and old habits are hard to break. There were several polls done by the Washington Post about the controversy years ago and, at the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist, they basically kept running the polls until they tweaked the sample baseline enough to “prove” that people wanted the name change, when nobody really did.

There were 3 polls to my recollection. I do not recall exact numbers by any stretch, but IIRC the first poll said that around 60-70% were okay with the name (this number was under-estimated - see my UPDATE below). They didn’t like that result (sadly, I can't find it) so a second poll was run in 2016 and MORE people said they wanted to keep the name. It was up to 90% with that one. Update: here is the 2016 poll (warning - pay wall pops up after a couple of seconds - fucking WaPo). They really didn’t like that result. Then, in 2020, UMich and UC-Berkeley ran a third poll. This time, they cherry-picked the sample base and it went their way. I mean, c'mon... Fucking Berkeley?? Not likely to find an impartial polling sample there. It didn’t help that FedEx, under pressure from other activist and advocacy groups at the time, threatened to pull their funding from the team unless Snyder changed the name. All his other sponsors followed suit. I think the US Patent Office (or one of those bureaucratic black holes of taxpayer dollars) even de-legitimized the trademark of the logo, forcing into the public domain. It was around that time that he caved.

There are some who say that he did it out of a newly-found sense of “social justice”. Anyone who knows about that guy knows that’s a laughable bald-faced lie. He was only ever worried about his bottom line. One of the biggest mistakes of the Snyder era, IMO. Some may call me racist for saying so. I don’t really much give a fuck.

UPDATE - I found this interesting little Wiki site on the subject. There were actually two opinion polls that were taken before the benchmark 2016 poll by the Washington Post (for a total of 4, including the 2020 UMich/Berkeley poll). The first one was done in 2002 by The Harris Poll for Sports Illustrated. They found that "81 percent of Native Americans who live outside traditional Indian reservations and 53 percent of Indians on reservations did not find the names or images used by sports teams to be discriminatory." The second was 2004, by the Annenberg Election Survey who stated, "Respondents who identified themselves as Native American were asked: 'The professional football team in Washington calls itself the Washington Redskins. As a Native American, do you find that name offensive or doesn't it bother you?' Ninety percent replied that the name did not bother them, nine percent said it was offensive, and one percent would not answer."

So, out of 4 polls, 3 of them basically said a vast super-majority of those identifying as Native American either don't care or like the logo/name (up to 90%). Only the Mich/Berkely poll shifts to the "prescribed narrative", which I would find typical. The thumbs were definitely on scales for that one.

UPDATE 2 - The Times of India (of all people! :wtf:) have reported earlier today (December 3, 2024) that "NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and the Washington Commanders' ownership are in discussions with Senate leaders about potentially reinstating the controversial 'Redskins' name and logo."

Can't really find any other articles about it in the legacy media in the US. I wonder why...
evUZsE6.gif


So enough of this faux outrage over a big, fat, nothing-burger. Bring back the logo and the name, already, FFS!
 
Last edited:
McCaffrey to IR, will be out for at least six weeks. His backup Jordan Mason is also going on IR.

Randy Moss is dealing with some sort of health issue. Without saying what it was, he urged men to get checkups and blood work done.
 
Last edited:
When McFarlane made sports figures, I would buy QBs, but only the good ones. So Drew Bledsoe and Dan Marino yes, Chris Weinke and Brady Quinn no. They started making them again but they're a lot more expensive, so should I gamble on Caleb Williams? Last time I gambled (they become more expensive once they're out of print), it was for Jameis Winston and Marcus Mariota.
 
When McFarlane made sports figures, I would buy QBs, but only the good ones. So Drew Bledsoe and Dan Marino yes, Chris Weinke and Brady Quinn no. They started making them again but they're a lot more expensive, so should I gamble on Caleb Williams? Last time I gambled (they become more expensive once they're out of print), it was for Jameis Winston and Marcus Mariota.

I'd wait to see who the Bears hire as Head Coach.
 
This is a season I would love to forget as a 49ers fan. The team has been bad, but the offseason tragedies have been overwhelming. Just found out today that Trent Williams had family tragedy, and Ward had some family tragedy as well. Add that to Pearsall being shot in the chest, and this season can't end soon enough.
 
What's with Jameis Winston and pick sixes?

Who's another QB known for putting up monster numbers but makes too many mistakes to win?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top