• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Newsflash: Shatner watches Star Trek episode

A beaker full of death

Vice Admiral
Admiral
http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/TV/06/09/shatner.star.trek.ap/index.html

Shatner on 'Trek': 'You know, that's rather good'


STUDIO CITY, California (AP) -- One recent week, William Shatner did something he hadn't done for many years -- watched the original "Star Trek." It was kind of an accident.
art.trek.jpg
In the "Trek" episode "A Piece of the Action," Spock and Kirk traveled to a planet modeled on 1920s gangsters.

Now, you might think that a bit odd. But Shatner rarely watches himself work. When it comes to acting, he says, he lives in the moment and moves on. Same thing these days with his work as Denny Crane on ABC's "Boston Legal."
This particular night, though, he was recovering from hip surgery and couldn't sleep, so he was watching TV. An old episode came on -- the one where the crew of the USS Enterprise visited a society that had modeled itself after Chicago gangsters of the 1920s. Kirk and Spock dressed up in pinstripe suits and held court as tough guys.
Watching, Shatner was more pleased than he expected.
"I haven't seen myself playing Captain Kirk in a long, long time," he says. "And I watched it now, from my perspective of 40 years later, and I thought, 'You know, that's rather good.' It's a starship captain trying to do the accent, the Noo Yawk accent, trying to play tough, trying to be one of the guys. It's not quite right, but it's what a starship captain would have done -- a decent imitation, enough to fool those guys but not the audience."
Shatner won't be playing Kirk in the upcoming reboot of "Star Trek" directed by J.J. Abrams. Leonard Nimoy plays an aging Spock, but the Jim Kirk character -- a young version -- is portrayed by actor Chris Pine. Shatner has said he's sad but not angry at the decision, which springs from the killing off of Kirk in the 1994 film "Star Trek Generations."
The recent late-night TV watching got Shatner thinking, though, about the character of Kirk and how it has endured.
"That was a good hero," Shatner says. "He made decisions. He was forceful. He was compassionate. He was the instigator. He fought hard and long physically and emotionally. He carried the dilemma of whether to intrude or not to intrude. It was all the classic forms of good Greek playmaking: The hero has the dilemma and resolves the dilemma."
Even the series' renowned cheesy production design, done on an increasingly tight budget through the show's 1966-69 run, didn't put him off.
"The actors were wonderful. And I didn't care about the sets or anything like that or the cheesy spaceship," Shatner says. "I think that's what happens in 'Star Trek.' Your eye goes past all the faults because you're concentrated on the actors and the plot."
 
He pretty much summed up why i like TOS the best. "Your eye goes past all the faults because you're concentrated on the actors and the plot."
 
^^ Faults are in the eye of the beholder. I don't see cheesy set and costume designs when I look at TOS or any old good film. I see what they could do the under the circumstances and accept it as is while filling in any potential blanks with my imagination.

In some ways I think some of what was done on TOS conceptually is still ahead of much of what we've gotten since. Indeed I could criticize a great deal of what we've gotten since no matter how polished the production.

I suspect more than a fair share of cgi f/x done today that is accepted are going to be much more obvious in the future.
 
Ya know, I didn't think that the sets of TOS were cheesy especially with the right kind of lighting. The early first season episodes are a great example of how lighting can make a set. By contrast, the late second season and third season are examples of how lighting can ruin a set. The sets by then were overly lit and the faults, I think, showed through more. The same with the sets of Babylon 5. When properly lit, the sets looked fantastic. When it wasn't lit well, the faults showed through.

As for the costumes, I've always preferred the simplicity of Theiss' designs with their easily identifiable ranks and departments. I even liked his TNG uniforms despite the fact that you had to be incredibly slim and trim to wear them.
 
art.trek.jpg



KID:"Hand over the velour shirts and styrofoam props or else the fella with jaundice GETS IT."
 
^^ Faults are in the eye of the beholder. I don't see cheesy set and costume designs when I look at TOS or any old good film. I see what they could do the under the circumstances and accept it as is while filling in any potential blanks with my imagination.

Agreed, 100%.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top