Ah yes. The "ample nacelles", as it were.
News? Stories from Dubious Sources
- Thread starter The Old Mixer
- Start date
Damn it, now I'm imagining the "Sir Cums Alot" scene from The Boys, except "Sir Cums Alot" is watching someone like James Dixon or Bernd from EAS giving a lecture on how Treknology and starship engineering works.
Sounds like the name of a Bond girl:
James: "What's your name?"
Girl (purring seductively): "Ample Nacelles."
Last edited:
Hey, cut Bernd some slack; he’s an ok guy. James Dixon, however, is completely bonkers.
He has a blind spot with regards to U.S. law.
He's based in the UK. He and his sources see everything through a UK lens (He said Sony was going to buy Paramount. I knew that was not going to happen -- U.S. law prohibited it.)
If the UK system applied to Seven of Nine, P+ would've had to pay Brannon Braga and Joe Menosky for every single episode of Star Trek: Picard!
Last edited:
He has a blind spot with regards to U.S. law.
He's based in the UK. He and his sources see everything through a UK lens (He said Sony was going to buy Paramount. I knew that was not going to happen -- U.S. law prohibited it.)
If the UK system applied to Seven of Nine, P+ would've had to pay Brannon Braga and Joe Menosky for every single episode of Star Trek: Picard!
He has a perpetual blind spot. Nothing he has said has ever been proven true on his own terms. Which is to say, when he’s been right, it’s felt circumstantial. Broadly, he’s consistently incorrect.
Note how wishy-washy he gets when he has to explain the particulars. Not just here, but anywhere. I’ve watched several of the guy’s videos through the years (I don’t feel bad for giving him a click; he gets so relatively few of them that this can’t be an especially profitable endeavour for him) and he tries to straddle the line between appeasing the YouTube anti-Kurtzman sphere and leaving the door open just an inch for more positive discussion. Presumably, because he’s a bit too intellectually savvy to make constant videos doing nothing but dissing modern Star Trek. Good on him for that, I suppose?
But look at the comments. Every video. He can’t help but attract the same chorus of boring sentiment that virtually every other person in his position has done on that platform. “No Kerman Trek!” “Kurtman in = bad! Kurtman out = good!” “Star Trek has been dead since 2005, Kurmen pisses on it every year.” These people can’t even figure out how to spell Alex Kurtzman’s name, but they sure do mention it on a daily basis.
My point is, Tachyon Pulse, or Sci Trek, or whatever you want to call it… it’s fueled by those hate clicks, its banners and thumbnails are designed to gather those people, and then the “exclusive” information which he provides is always so murky as to evade complete scrutiny, and never intrinsically accurate. Nothing he says can be verified. Oftentimes, it doesn’t pan out as he says it might. And he seems to think that television executives care about granular lore details in the products they make, which is… rare, at best.
I think it’s feasible that the guy has spoken with people a handful of times, but I doubt very strongly that those people are in prime positions to tell him anything of real consequence, and I could just as soon believe he makes everything up without exception.
Similar threads
