Section31 as well, says Captain Xavi.
To quote JTK "Don't believe them.....Don't trust them"........I don't see it being set in the 1990s.
Section31 as well, says Captain Xavi.
LOL----I did too months ago. I have not seen anyone talking about their heads exploding, but I don't go looking either. I'm sure they can find a way to make money off the hate though.I've blocked all the modern-Trek 'hate sites'. But I imagine they're all still losing their collective tiny clickbait minds. Unless...they've sniffed wind and have gone for: tru-Trek with white main cast and episodic storytelling. Yay us...
Its tiresome. Rumors are useless too. Just let it happen.I've blocked all the modern-Trek 'hate sites'. But I imagine they're all still losing their collective tiny clickbait minds. Unless...they've sniffed wind and have gone for: tru-Trek with white main cast and episodic storytelling. Yay us...
Seems like that would just be opening a huge can of worms........for the writers. Does that mean WE are in an alternate timeline since things did not play out like they were foretold in TOS. Will Section 31 correct it and if they do........do WE ALL DIE?To entertain the notion...1990s...Section 31...maybe an attempt to deal with the Eugenics Wars...?
It's the one thing that gives me pause. With the case of SNW, it's not "All the right people hate it." It's "Most of the right people hate it, but some of the wrong people like it."I've blocked all the modern-Trek 'hate sites'. But I imagine they're all still losing their collective tiny clickbait minds. Unless...they've sniffed wind and have gone for: tru-Trek with white main cast and episodic storytelling. Yay us...
I think the storyline was Section 31 go back in time to ensure the Eugenics Wars and World War 3 happen.Will Section 31 correct it and if they do........do WE ALL DIE?
Well, color me not interested in the Section 31 series. Pretty much had my fill of time travel BS.Seems like that would just be opening a huge can of worms........for the writers. Does that mean WE are in an alternate timeline since things did not play out like they were foretold in TOS. Will Section 31 correct it and if they do........do WE ALL DIE?
I don't think that's the real plot........I hope not anyway. I have never really WANTED to see a Sec-31 show. But I didn't want a show based on a space station either........lol. That one turned out to me my favorite.Well, color me not interested in the Section 31 series. Pretty much had my fill of time travel BS.
How can anyone like or hate it before it has even been made?It's the one thing that gives me pause. With the case of SNW, it's not "All the right people hate it." It's "Most of the right people hate it, but some of the wrong people like it."
They can't. But I've seen this type of behavior anyway since I got online in 1996. To quote Spock, "It is not logical, but it is often true."How can anyone like or hate it before it has even been made?
Well, i will reserve judgement until the show airs.I don't think that's the real plot........I hope not anyway. I have never really WANTED to see a Sec-31 show. But I didn't want a show based on a space station either........lol. That one turned out to me my favorite.
Because that's the name of the game.How can anyone like or hate it before it has even been made?
How can anyone like or hate it before it has even been made?
Hannibal Lecter confirmed as in Star Trek canon.I've GOT IT! Section 31 was sharing facilities with Clarice, whose main character is Clarice STARLING... IN '96 Voyager visited Earth and met Henry STARLING...Both shows would be set in the 90s...
::Gasp::
They are the SAME SHOW!!
Dun dun DUN
Well, that is something that could benefit from fleshing out...If Section 31 has to do with time travel to the 90s maybe it can elaborate more on the temporal cold war from Enterprise.
It's the cancelled London theme parkThat sucks because I'm REALLY looking forward to that one. Is that concept art for the show, I wonder?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.