I'm looking foward to seeing Beckinsale and Biel go at it.![]()
You realize, I'm sure, this movie is more closely tied to the original short-story than it is the Schwarzenegger movie, right? (And IIRC the original story didn't have much to do, if anything, with Mars.)
You realize, I'm sure, this movie is more closely tied to the original short-story than it is the Schwarzenegger movie, right? (And IIRC the original story didn't have much to do, if anything, with Mars.)
You realize, I'm sure, this movie is more closely tied to the original short-story than it is the Schwarzenegger movie, right? (And IIRC the original story didn't have much to do, if anything, with Mars.)
I've never read the original story.
I've read the story and seen the 1990 movie, and this trailer looks *much* more like a remake of that movie than a new adaptation of the short story. I don't remember a three-breasted hooker in the short story...Few have, really. But the way you were talking here it seemed you were unaware that this movie was more of a new take on the story than it was a remake of the movie.
Simple: marketing.But very few people have even heard of the original story. When the Total Recal title is mentioned people think of the Arnie movie with the extreme violence and funny one liners.You realize, I'm sure, this movie is more closely tied to the original short-story than it is the Schwarzenegger movie, right? (And IIRC the original story didn't have much to do, if anything, with Mars.)
If they are going to use the original story why didn't they use the original book title?
That is what was originally said, but, that Trailer, makes it appear to be an almost exact remake of the Arnold movie, if you simply take away the Mars element. Lines and scenes lifted directly from the Arnold movieYou realize, I'm sure, this movie is more closely tied to the original short-story than it is the Schwarzenegger movie, right? (And IIRC the original story didn't have much to do, if anything, with Mars.)
I've never read the original story.
Few have, really. But the way you were talking here it seemed you were unaware that this movie was more of a new take on the story than it was a remake of the movie.
Wasn't that from the original?"I give good wife."
Okay, that was a good line.
^Because, "We can Imagine it for You Wholesale", sucks for a big box office action movie.
No, I don't think it was in the original.Wasn't that from the original?
I know I haven't seen in in many years, but my brain remembers Stone saying it.
Wasn't that from the original?"I give good wife."
Okay, that was a good line.
I know I haven't seen in in many years, but my brain remembers Stone saying it.
I'm looking foward to seeing Beckinsale and Biel go at it.![]()
^Because, "We can Imagine it for You Wholesale", sucks for a big box office action movie.
It's remember not imagine.
Verhoeven's Total Recall isn't the worst Philip K. Dick film ever, but it was pretty mediocre (and lacked the great ending of the short story). Really the only appealing thing about it is the idea that the tiresome action cheese that drives the picture just the fantasy of a brain frying itself in a chair.The original film was perfect... that's the main reason this film will have problems
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.