New Enterprise dedication plaque
- Thread starter SalvorHardin
- Start date
Can't wait for the new tech manual which will explain the Iowa/San Fransisco shipyards question, than again that Constitution class Starship we saw being built in Iowa may not have been the USS Enterprise. We'll learn the truth when the manual gets published.
Seconded.
The NCC-1701 on the nacelle as the shuttle takes off is a dead giveaway.
I don't think we have seen it before, have we ?
It appears briefly in the Starships documentary, but we don't get a clue exactly where on the bridge it is.
So it's Starship Class! Love it!
Hahaha...a dramatic lack of imagination there.
Well, they obviously copied it from the TOS dedication plaque.
So...there's a USS Starship out there? 
Perhaps "Starship-type" would've been better... but you'd have to go all the way back to TOS to address what they were thinking of. Originally a starship was meant to be a type of big, fast, powerful, long-duration spacecraft set apart from all others - a type to which the Enterprise belonged. I don't think they were thinking of Navy-style class designations when they came up with it, as later came into use.So...there's a USS Starship out there?
A little reminder
Also, from the movie's official site
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Constitution_class
Also, from the movie's official site
Yup. Some nerd was paying attention!
Can anyone make out what the plaque says in the upper right corner?
As far as "San Francisco Fleet Yards" goes, it's been said before (and before and before and before), but why couldn't one of those yards be in Riverside, Iowa? Airbus has plants all over Europe. If an airbus airliner had "Airbus: Toulouse, France" on some kind of specifications sticker or plaque, we wouldn't automatically assume that's where the entire plane was built. It's a corporate headquarters thing.
Components for the Enterprise were probably built in places all over the world, and sent to Riverside for final assembly. It would all be part of the San Francisco Fleet Yards -- a world-wide conglomerate if you will.
As far as "San Francisco Fleet Yards" goes, it's been said before (and before and before and before), but why couldn't one of those yards be in Riverside, Iowa? Airbus has plants all over Europe. If an airbus airliner had "Airbus: Toulouse, France" on some kind of specifications sticker or plaque, we wouldn't automatically assume that's where the entire plane was built. It's a corporate headquarters thing.
Components for the Enterprise were probably built in places all over the world, and sent to Riverside for final assembly. It would all be part of the San Francisco Fleet Yards -- a world-wide conglomerate if you will.
Well this makes sense and actually fits in with my conjecture and theory since finding out the alternate-timeline Enty is built in Iowa...Iowa and other North American shipyard facilities fall within the jurisdiction and lines of San Francisco's authority.
So...there's a USS Starship out there?
I dunno. Was there one during TOS?
So...there's a USS Starship out there?
I dunno. Was there one during TOS?
As inconsistent as many early TOS episodes were with the new canon and universe? Probably.
That plaque looks like it belongs on the USS Relativity from the 29th century.
I like the TOS-esque inscriptions and homage to the classic plaque, but its way too silver and angular.We don't see direct evidence that the ship in the dark would be the Enterprise. She's merely a ship of that design.
We do see that the ship later seen in daylight is the Enterprise. But we could in theory say that after the fateful night, Kirk rode his bike all the way to San Francisco (he's the type to do that sort of riding), looked around to see where Starfleet might be, spotted the local shipyards (which had something like six of these babies under construction, including the Enterprise), drove there, and boarded the shuttle for the ride to the campus.
Timo Saloniemi
ST-One
Vice Admiral
Similar threads
