To my knowledge, the large Excelsior model only had the following applied to it...NX-2000, USS ExcelsiorThe Hood's registry first appeared in a graphic in TNG and later in the Encyclopedia.
NCC-2541, USS Hood
NCC-2000, USS Excelsior
NCC-1701-B, USS Enterprise
NCC-42768, USS Lakota
The model that Jein made had a few registry numbers applied over it's career, though I only have photos of it as the USS Excelsior (NCC-2000), USS Fredrickson (NCC-4211) and USS Excelsior (NCC-2000 put back with missized decals).
Summary of Uses
The large model was used for the:
* USS Excelsior, NX-2000, 3rd & 4th movies
* USS Hood, NCC-2541, TNG Series
* USS Excelsior, NCC-2000, 6th movie
* USS Melbourne, NCC-62043, "Emissary"
Should have I included a survey, where I asked the reader, do you see NCC-2541? Would this have reduced the acrimony?
Should have I included a survey, where I asked the reader, do you see NCC-2541? Would this have reduced the acrimony?
No. You should have asked: "What number, if any, you can see here."
To me it could just as easily be 2391, for example. Without prior knowledge, there is no way to read it clearly.
In any case, why does this matter?
So it seems we have evidence for two Excelsior-class ships named Hood...?
Yeah, I was going to say. Not a problem if one of them met with its demise or was decommissioned.
Also this seems like a stupidly trivial thing to be arguing about.
^Or just a changed premise. It's no different than "James R. Kirk," and no one's rushing to find convoluted explanations for that. YMMV.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.