Yesterday, your DNA was essentially the same as that of every other organism in existence. If it was alive, you were related to it.
Today, that's no longer true.
Today, that's no longer true.
Yesterday, your DNA was essentially the same as that of every other organism in existence. If it was alive, you were related to it.
Today, that's no longer true.
If you look at the study itself, the researchers exposed the bacterium to increasing levels of arsenic. As the arsenic level rose, the bacterium was able to not just metabolise it but actually substitute it instead of phosporous. That's the new finding being reported, and of course, is very significant.
However, the bacterium fared best in a phosphorus environment, and in that setting used phosphorus in its chemical make-up (like other life) not arsenic.
If it's preferred "set-up" is phosphorus, it's reasonable to suppose that that is the environment it originally evolved in, and the ability to incorporate arsenic is an extremophile evolutionary adaptation rather than a truly separate branch of life.
So, yes, it is a new lifeform. But it may simply be an unusual branch of our own evolutionary hierarchy rather than life whose evolutionary origin point was separate. So not quite proof of parallel life. It increases the odds that this can happen, but not evidence in and of itself.
This is the kind of stuff that really makes me angry that I'm mortal. I would love to live forever and see how this kind of stuff continues to evolve.
If you look at the study itself, the researchers exposed the bacterium to increasing levels of arsenic. As the arsenic level rose, the bacterium was able to not just metabolise it but actually substitute it instead of phosporous. That's the new finding being reported, and of course, is very significant.
However, the bacterium fared best in a phosphorus environment, and in that setting used phosphorus in its chemical make-up (like other life) not arsenic.
If its preferred "set-up" is phosphorus, it's reasonable to suppose that that is the environment it originally evolved in, and the ability to incorporate arsenic is an extremophile evolutionary adaptation rather than a truly separate branch of life.
So, yes, it is a new lifeform. But it may simply be an unusual branch of our own evolutionary hierarchy rather than life whose evolutionary origin point was separate. So not quite proof of parallel life. It increases the odds that this can happen, but not evidence in and of itself.
If you look at the study itself, the researchers exposed the bacterium to increasing levels of arsenic. As the arsenic level rose, the bacterium was able to not just metabolise it but actually substitute it instead of phosporous. That's the new finding being reported, and of course, is very significant.
However, the bacterium fared best in a phosphorus environment, and in that setting used phosphorus in its chemical make-up (like other life) not arsenic.
If it's preferred "set-up" is phosphorus, it's reasonable to suppose that that is the environment it originally evolved in, and the ability to incorporate arsenic is an extremophile evolutionary adaptation rather than a truly separate branch of life.
So, yes, it is a new lifeform. But it may simply be an unusual branch of our own evolutionary hierarchy rather than life whose evolutionary origin point was separate. So not quite proof of parallel life. It increases the odds that this can happen, but not evidence in and of itself.
You'd be more excited if they were wearing dandy pants.
I'm just waiting for them to discover the giant arsenic monsters that are obviously living in the same lake.
Or vice versa. Even if it is an adaptation-- and it would be a hell of an adaptation-- it still demonstrates that life can be more alien than we've previously seen. This is very exciting.If its preferred "set-up" is phosphorus, it's reasonable to suppose that that is the environment it originally evolved in, and the ability to incorporate arsenic is an extremophile evolutionary adaptation rather than a truly separate branch of life.
Is that really a surprise? Almost anyone can alter a Wikipedia entry. It is a shame that so many people rely on it for "facts".The Wikipedia page about this type of bacteria has already been vandalized.
The Halomonadaceae are a family of Proteobacteria. It was discovered by NASA that a particular strain the Halomonadaceae family, called GFAJ-1, could be found at the bottom of Mono Lake near California Yosemite National Park. It was this discovery that lead to Halomondacea powered engines, and allowed man to travel the stars. Where we met Thentolos race of Neptune. We had ice cream, it was great.![]()
No, it's a big whoop if you work there, and read Arsenic Weekly.
A "mild whoop" would have been if they found living arsenic bacteria on Mars.
An "exciting whoop" would have been living anything on a moon other than ours.
A "big whoop" would have been actual comfirmation of something other than bacterial, living on one of the moons (or even in Mars is surface sand/dust).
So something that is entirely different from all known life is just blah to you?
It's NOT NEWS. We've alreayd heard this in variations before, from the hot springs on the ocean floor, to the lake full of (I forget what chemical), to what ever else I am forgetting. And it's not hte last time we're going to hear of it. This isn't press conference stuff, especially with two days notice. This is text scrawling on the bottom of the screen in tiny letters while REAL NEWS is being reported.
And no, life on Mars wouldn't be a big whoop. It would be exciting, mind you. But ... so what?
So, yes, it is a new lifeform. But it may simply be an unusual branch of our own evolutionary hierarchy rather than life whose evolutionary origin point was separate. So not quite proof of parallel life. It increases the odds that this can happen, but not evidence in and of itself.
You'd be more excited if they were wearing dandy pants.
Call me when they develop the ability to wear silk handkerchiefs; that's civilisation.![]()
No, it's a big whoop if you work there, and read Arsenic Weekly.
A "mild whoop" would have been if they found living arsenic bacteria on Mars.
An "exciting whoop" would have been living anything on a moon other than ours.
A "big whoop" would have been actual comfirmation of something other than bacterial, living on one of the moons (or even in Mars is surface sand/dust).
These new bacteria can indeed integrate arsenic into their biomolecular architecture, which makes them unique so far.
Call me when they develop the ability to wear silk handkerchiefs; that's civilisation.![]()
Not at all. I giggled.You'd be more excited if they were wearing dandy pants.
Call me when they develop the ability to wear silk handkerchiefs; that's civilisation.![]()
Or, at the very least, old lace.
[Too obscure?]![]()
Or, at the very least, old lace.Call me when they develop the ability to wear silk handkerchiefs; that's civilisation.You'd be more excited if they were wearing dandy pants.![]()
[Too obscure?]![]()
Not at all. I giggled.Call me when they develop the ability to wear silk handkerchiefs; that's civilisation.![]()
Or, at the very least, old lace.
[Too obscure?]![]()
![]()
Or, at the very least, old lace.Call me when they develop the ability to wear silk handkerchiefs; that's civilisation.![]()
[Too obscure?]![]()
It'll do for a mild chortle.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.