• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

NASA names 2012 the most absurd science-fiction film ever

Lyon_Wonder

Captain
Captain
The worst sci-fi film?


“2012, Roland Emmerich’s gleefully comprehensive demolition-job disaster movie, has been named the most absurd science-fiction film ever by NASA,” The Guardian reports. “The film, which was released in 2009 to groans of guilty pleasure and the healthy ringing of cash registers … was deemed the silliest and most scientifically flawed film at a conference in California. Set on Dec. 21, 2012, the film tells the story of John Cusack and Amanda Peet’s marital reconciliation, against the backdrop of the end of the world – an effect of mysterious neutrino particles that lay waste to the globe’s top tourist attractions. … Part of NASA’s gripe with the film, it emerged, was the mushrooming mailbags it had triggered. ‘The agency is getting so many questions from people terrified that the world is going to end that we have had to put up a special website to challenge the myths. We never had to do this before.’ They were also unhappy with the use of neutrino particles, which in the film cause solar flares, earthquakes, hurricanes and tsunamis, but which in fact can’t interact with physical substances.”
 
neutrinos... in fact can’t interact with physical substances

Can too. It'd be pretty stupid of us to have built Super-Kamiokande and the Ice Cube if they didn't, now wouldn't it?

Maybe if they didn't dumb things down, people would be smarter.
 
So thats why NASA cannot get anything done, they are to busy wasting tax dollars reviewing movies.
 
They were also unhappy with the use of neutrino particles, which in the film cause solar flares, earthquakes, hurricanes and tsunamis, but which in fact can’t interact with physical substances.”

If that's true, then they slept through the first 5 minutes of the movie.
 
At the very least it was the best movie about 2012 starring John Cusack and Amanda Peet ever made. Can we at least agree on that?

And I can't say I've ever worried about the 2012 thing. If I was going to start I certainly wouldn't be taking my cues from Hollywood.
 
I think Roland's next film should just be a rube goldberg chain of explosions.

The opening scene shows a smoke stack being blown over into a pile of Black powder that explodes sending debris from the stack raining down onto glass containers filled with Thermite that ignites and melts chains holding crates of C-4 that drops into a 3000 gallon tank of Kerosene.

And so on for 98 minutes.
 
2012 is one of the best comedies I've ever seen. Of course it's absurd and completely non-scientific, but no one watches Emmerich's disaster porn because it's scientifically accurate.
 
I currently have this movie from Netflix. Now I'm REALLY looking forward to watching it! :lol:
 
I think Roland's next film should just be a rube goldberg chain of explosions.

The opening scene shows a smoke stack being blown over into a pile of Black powder that explodes sending debris from the stack raining down onto glass containers filled with Thermite that ignites and melts chains holding crates of C-4 that drops into a 3000 gallon tank of Kerosene.

And so on for 98 minutes.

Actually Roland's next film is going to be about Shakespeare







Wait, What?!
 
I currently have this movie from Netflix. Now I'm REALLY looking forward to watching it! :lol:

...I rented it for a buck and you'll enjoy it if you follow my technique:

Every time a character says something, hit fast forward until they stop talking or until something explodes.

Repeat as needed. :D
 
Klaus said:
Every time a character says something, hit fast forward until they stop talking or until something explodes.
Unless it's Woody Harelson's character. He was hilarious.
 
I think Roland's next film should just be a rube goldberg chain of explosions.

The opening scene shows a smoke stack being blown over into a pile of Black powder that explodes sending debris from the stack raining down onto glass containers filled with Thermite that ignites and melts chains holding crates of C-4 that drops into a 3000 gallon tank of Kerosene.

And so on for 98 minutes.

Actually Roland's next film is going to be about Shakespeare







Wait, What?!

I guess...that's...plausible...

All of a sudden I feel very, very sleepy.
 
I thought this movie was at least as accurate as "Earthquake" or "The Towering Inferno".

Disaster movies don't have to make sense, they just have to put a huge cast into a series of improbable disasters.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top