I'm wondering if there's a way to improve on the newspapers. Maybe long, continuous reams of paper direct from a paper mill? And instead of just laying them atop one another, weave them together. Although that would probably be hard to do with paper that's saturated with water.
Weaving them would work. I aslo would think a studerier "paper" if not thin cardboard would add some structure to it (i.e. what they built would be rendered floppy as it "melts.")
I still don't see it as a practical building material.
On bi-secting the car, I wonder what would happen if it was just a sharp blade stuck in the ground for the car to impact. Not like a plow or triangular piece just a tall, straight, blade (with some sort of structure on top of or around it to make sturdy). The problem with the blow was that it was ramped up which pushed the car upwards (meaning the roof didn't get cut) and the structure of the blade smahed up the car as much as it sliced it.
But, really, I can't think of anything "wrong" in this episode. That track-based crash-test system would be ideal to use though for myths where the accuracy of the impact is important. Like in last week's "pancaked" car myth.
But, again, I can't really think of anything to comment on this episode. Not a lot of "substance" in this episode as the myths were testing and absurd accident scenario that I think we all know isn't possible (who drives 50 miles an hour in a blizzard white-out conditions? Plus they had to "help" the myth a
lot for it to work) and a fascinating and interesting if impractical and useless building material.
Next week looks to be mediocre episode too. One of the "myths" I've already seen tested on a similar themed show on Food Network -and I also think we know it's an exagerated "myth."