Is that really any different from the old title sequence filled with explosions and fire and Tory failing to jump the wagon on his bicycle? Both don't do a good job of introducing the concept of the show.My one problem is that the new main title sequence is more about building stuff than busting myths. If not for the title, a newcomer watching that opening sequence would have no idea what the show was really about.
I mean, I definitely like the old one better, but I don't think the new one is any worse at getting the show's concept across. (And fortunately they don't cut to commercial, but instead go right back into the show, where they do get into what the show's about.)
He was a contract model worker who didn't even get into the credits, according to his discussions of it on his podcast. I think that if he asked, he'd be playing more on his role as the host of Mythbusters than any relationship with ILM (especially since the model shop where he worked was sold off a decade ago).What surprised me is that Adam needed to estimate the set's proportions by studying the film footage. He used to work at ILM! Couldn't he have just called them up and gotten a look at the set blueprints?
The visual evidence shows that it definitively is a sonic boom, versus being generated by some other feature of the whip as it travels.It was an okay bit of science demonstration, but I'm not sure they needed visual evidence to prove it moved faster than sound; the whip crack itself is the evidence, because it's a miniature sonic boom. This wasn't testing a myth so much as demonstrating an established fact.