I liked it. I didn't hate it, but I didn't love it. Some parts I liked, some I disliked. I liked Old Spock, "Nu"McCoy, the special effects, and the "teaser" (pre-title scene). I disliked "Nu"Kirk (too much of a douchebag), the villain (how two-dimensional can a villain get?), and "Nu"Chekov (WAAAAY too Russian).
One thing that I absolutely hate is not the movie, but the constant bickering between those who loved and hated it.
Here's an average discussion on a forum:
User #1: I liked it.
User #2: I hated it.
User #1: You suck for hating it.
User #2: Blah it had (insert canon violation here) and I hated it, it was dumb dumby poopy.
User #1: Blah shut up, you should be worshiping the movie like I do.

Have Trek fans always been this argumentative about something?
Another thing that bothers me is the constant "jizzing of pants" as I call it, over the movie. Sure, it was good, but some people are too um... enthusiastic. *dodges brick*
Then there's the alternate universe crap. In past Trek episodes/movies, someone goes back in time, changes some shit, and the main timeline is altered forever. Good examples are "Star Trek: First Contact" and "The City on the Edge of Forever". The same principles should apply to the new movie. But Roberto Orci or the other one, (can't remember his name at the moment, nor do I care) told everyone that Nero created an "alternate timeline", which didn't affect the "prime" timeline at all. Are we really to believe that happened, because the guy said so?
Again, I liked the new movie, so please don't call me a "hater" or a "naysayer". These are just things I've been needing to say for months.
One thing that I absolutely hate is not the movie, but the constant bickering between those who loved and hated it.
Here's an average discussion on a forum:
User #1: I liked it.
User #2: I hated it.
User #1: You suck for hating it.
User #2: Blah it had (insert canon violation here) and I hated it, it was dumb dumby poopy.
User #1: Blah shut up, you should be worshiping the movie like I do.

Have Trek fans always been this argumentative about something?
Another thing that bothers me is the constant "jizzing of pants" as I call it, over the movie. Sure, it was good, but some people are too um... enthusiastic. *dodges brick*
Then there's the alternate universe crap. In past Trek episodes/movies, someone goes back in time, changes some shit, and the main timeline is altered forever. Good examples are "Star Trek: First Contact" and "The City on the Edge of Forever". The same principles should apply to the new movie. But Roberto Orci or the other one, (can't remember his name at the moment, nor do I care) told everyone that Nero created an "alternate timeline", which didn't affect the "prime" timeline at all. Are we really to believe that happened, because the guy said so?

Again, I liked the new movie, so please don't call me a "hater" or a "naysayer". These are just things I've been needing to say for months.