• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

My homebrew kitbashes

Not thinking this is going to be a new 'wave' of posts, just the result of some spare time with nothing better to do, and one I don't think I'd posted from the "archives"

Minerva-class scout
Minerva.png


USS T'Penga
Tpenga2.png


Shiva-class battleship (Terran Empire)
Shiva.png


Cook-class extended range survey vessel (Napoleon-class variant)
Cookclass.png
 
Last edited:
Slight amendment to credits on Cook class to reflect original design by SFB. Thanks to Tyndia at STSTCSOLD&A for the heads up

Cookclass1.png
 
If it's a survey vessel you should cover that big flat spine with sensors of some sort, use the surface to your advantage.
 
I didn't want to "over greeble" it, visually. Besides, you really can't put anything there as it would block the clearance for the impulse engine exhaust. Not only would it damage anything sticking up into it, but the radiation I would think would mess up the readings. That's why I put the sensor "pod" where I did.
 
Anyone who has followed my work knows that I don't have a problem with "no dish" ships like the Reliant, and that I absolutely HATE "dangley dishes" (where they just stick the dish off a spar below the saucer). That said, dishes are a traditional part of most Starfleet designs.

I was playing with how I could put a dish on the Cook class creditably, and came up with this:

Cookclass2.png
 
^^^ Heh...you were inspired by Forbin's "Ascender" when you added that front nav deflector dish, weren't you? :D

Theoretically, you could have two smaller dishes on the exposed front of each bulge on the lower hull. Might make it a little more integrated and less of an afterthought.
 
^^^ Heh...you were inspired by Forbin's "Ascender" when you added that front nav deflector dish, weren't you? :D

Actually, no...I hadn't read that thread yet (just got back from there). There was a similar ship in Ships of the Line a few years ago and that's where I probably got the idea.

Theoretically, you could have two smaller dishes on the exposed front of each bulge on the lower hull. Might make it a little more integrated and less of an afterthought.

I might play with that some time...this was more of a "doodle" anyways. I'm trying very hard not to spend all my time on kitbashing right now. This little "mini wave" was me having literally nothing better to do with several hours over a couple of days.

I've been trying to give you that break you were looking for, but sometimes "the bug" just won't leave me alone. :)
 
^^^ Well, it might not happen for a long time at this point. My wife and I are 2 weeks away from our first-born arriving, and I suspect that will occupy my time for the greater part. So, long and short, don't wait up for me. :)
 
Bernard Guignard suggested I try two smaller dishes on the underbelly. I did, and didn't like the result, but I DO like this one

Cookclass3.png
 
It is impolitic to say that the Empire ever truly fails, not all of it's endeavors work out as well as might be hoped. One such case is that of the Genghis Khan-class battleship. First draft design for the class was completed by 2282, and included what were thought to be the leading edge of future technological development for the Imperial Starfleet.

The basic hull design of the class was very traditional, based on time honored and tested concepts, with the addition of a few newer modifications that showed great promise The use of the MK 17-A enlarged saucer section was a welcome improvement over the older MK-15 model originally proposed. The extra enclosed space made it possible to reconfigure internal volumes slightly to improve utilities distribution such as life support gasses, computer interface optical cabling, and power transfer conduits.

The fault in the class lay in the weapons systems. The use of the FH-X-1 LAPT phaser banks did not prove as advantageous as the designers promised, and the massive 10 tube torpedo bay at the base of the inter-hull dorsal relied greatly on automation. The combination of the two worked well so long as the ship suffered no significant damage to either system. Once damage was incurred, however, the loss of efficiency significantly degraded combat capabilities. The torpedo systems in particular were extremely difficult to operate manually, and the concentration of the bulk of the tubes in one location meant that a single lucky strike could easily affect 1/3 of the overall torpedo firepower, if not more.

Only the initial order of five hulls of the class were built as a result. All were ultimately transferred to second-line duty in provincial fleets, where they served admirably.

---Senator (former Admiral) Augustus Leonard Cartwright, 2290

GenghisKhan2.png
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top