The comic was simply a cash grab - I don't treat any of it as real.
Freudian slip.

The comic was simply a cash grab - I don't treat any of it as real.
Which of course draws the very important and meaningful question...Well, a lot of it seemed empty, probably for storing minerals. Surely those grabby-tentacle things are for locking on to giant chunks of planet/asteroid? I like to think of it as the Romulan Red Dwarf.![]()
Which Romulan was the Cat?
Actually, we know what the intent of the Narada was, based upon the fact that the filmwriters produced the story for the prequel comic, which showed Narada looking much more "normal" initially. The Narada was upgraded with captured Borg technology... it essentially "grew" into the form you see in the film, in an almost organic way. The Narada, as-built, was much smaller and much less powerful.
There's probably some small element of the original Romulan Narada inside that big chunk... and that's most likely where most of the action takes place. The "tentacle-y" bits are Romu-Borg, however.
Thing is though, if you're referring to the TrekMovie Q&A - even as they say that they backpedal a bit. Not only do they phrase "The comic is not canon?" as a question, making it a possibility rather than a ruling; they go on to say "The Countdown comic shows that the TNG timeline continues on after Spock’s death/disappearance", which makes sense as an answer only if Countdown, well, counts...Orci and Kurtzman have said that the comics aren't canon, so the whole Borg/Romulan fusion tech refit thing goes out the window.
Yeah, I'd be happy to ignore the Borg stuff, if the comic isn't really canon. Really, I could go either way with it. A Borgified mining ship seems so fanwanky...
Yeah, I'd be happy to ignore the Borg stuff, if the comic isn't really canon. Really, I could go either way with it. A Borgified mining ship seems so fanwanky...
Could not agree more. If I never heard the word "Borg" again, it'll be too soon.
in that alternate universe, why expect to see the Borg at any time in the 23d century?
Yeah, the Reavers in "Firefly" were a GREAT concept... shame that the show didn't last longer, because I'd have loved to have seen them carried forward for several more seasons before we finally found out what was behind them (which, I thought, was a FANTASTIC concept, and very applicable to today IMHO).We don't need to revamp the Borg, just keep them to what they were supposed to be in the first place: keep the ineffable hive mind with no interest in conquering people or domination, only interested in technology.
Which is weird, because in FC and Voyager they became the opposite of that: they didn't seem interested in technology at all, in fact the Borg Queen cooked up this entire time travel business just to assimilate Earth at a time when they had no technology of any kind.
If I were to redo the borg--even in the 23rd century--I'd recast them as something similar to the Reavers in "Firefly." They come and go, they don't talk to anyone, they don't even make threats, they just occasionally "get hungry" and suddenly a starship shows up in deep space with its engines and computer cores pulled off, the crew butchered and harvested for organs and vital tissue.
Praetor said:Didn't someone suggest the Narada's mining function might have been "mining" (or, really capturing) tiny natural singularities for power useage? An intriguing idea...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.