• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Most Gratuitous Trek MacGuffin!

Which one of these best demonstrates the use of a MacGuffin in Trek?

  • The Genesis Device

    Votes: 5 7.0%
  • Red Matter

    Votes: 25 35.2%
  • Near Nudity and Sex

    Votes: 3 4.2%
  • Bajoran Orbs

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • V'Ger

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Morphogenic Matrix

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Q

    Votes: 3 4.2%
  • Section 31

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Whales

    Votes: 5 7.0%
  • Quadrotriticale

    Votes: 18 25.4%
  • Spock's Brain ("Brain and Brain!")

    Votes: 5 7.0%
  • Dilithium Crystals

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • The Cloaking Device

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Zenite

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Spock's Katra

    Votes: 2 2.8%

  • Total voters
    71
Status
Not open for further replies.
And really, red matter is just technobabble too, in weapon form.

Yep. That's all it is. It's not something that Kirk even finds out about until he mind-melds with Spock Prime. Kirk's goal as the protagonist has already been established by then: defeat Nero.

And Red Matter is not unimportant for the plot. It detroyed a planet.

You could make the same claim about protomatter in SFS, but like that plot gimmick, it still lacks all credibility.
 
I voted for the Cloaking Device (by which I presume is meant the one Spock and Kirk steal), because it never plays any role in anything afterward ever again. Even when the Pegasus has a phase-cloak on TNG, or the Defiant finally has a cloak on DS9, it isn't because of the stolen cloaking device. Its theft was meaningless except to advance the plot of that TOS episode.
 
Yep. That's all it is. It's not something that Kirk even finds out about until he mind-melds with Spock Prime. Kirk's goal as the protagonist has already been established by then: defeat Nero.

And Red Matter is not unimportant for the plot. It detroyed a planet.

You could make the same claim about protomatter in SFS, but like that plot gimmick, it still lacks all credibility.

So what? A McGuffin is not defined by the lack of credibility.
 
Actually, credibility does contribute to acceptance. NOTORIOUS with its atom secrets is a great example. Then again, FOUL PLAY's is something I don't even remember, just that it was in a pack of Marlboros that a snake did some hissing over.
 
So what? A McGuffin is not defined by the lack of credibility.

Credibility or the lack of the slightest intimation, even one with the express intent of throwing yet another curve, of its identity. Like in Ronin. What was in that case? Oh yeah right, there was no case!!!
 
Red matter. Take everything else in the ST canon, and red matter outclasses it in terms of sheer hand-wavery. It's maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagic. What else can you say about stuff with a name that simplistic that can destroy wormholes or turn volcanos into icecapped mountains?
 
Red matter. Take everything else in the ST canon, and red matter outclasses it in terms of sheer hand-wavery. It's maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagic. What else can you say about stuff with a name that simplistic that can destroy wormholes or turn volcanos into icecapped mountains?

It was a "cold fusion device" that froze the volcano. Just sayin'. ;)
 
Red matter. Take everything else in the ST canon, and red matter outclasses it in terms of sheer hand-wavery. It's maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagic. What else can you say about stuff with a name that simplistic that can destroy wormholes or turn volcanos into icecapped mountains?
Genesis is a pretty simple name. And Red matter creates wormholes.(That swallow supernovas)
 
Red matter. Take everything else in the ST canon, and red matter outclasses it in terms of sheer hand-wavery. It's maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagic. What else can you say about stuff with a name that simplistic that can destroy wormholes or turn volcanos into icecapped mountains?

What this has to do with being a McGuffin..?

The plausibility (or absence of) is not an element required to define a McGuffin

The whole point of the MacGuffin is that it is irrelevant. And the Red Matter is not irrilevant because it destroyed Vulcan.
 
Red matter. Take everything else in the ST canon, and red matter outclasses it in terms of sheer hand-wavery. It's maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagic. What else can you say about stuff with a name that simplistic that can destroy wormholes or turn volcanos into icecapped mountains?
What about the Nexus?
I think that outclasses everything else. Based on its ability to control your mind, grant all your wishes, allow you to travel anywhere in time or space and give you eternal life.

Excepting maybe the giant amoeba thingy which outclasses everything by its sheer size because its the biggest organism every seen in Star Trek by a good million kilometers or so.

But none of red matter, the Nexus and giant amoeba thingy are macguffins. They are too essential to the story. They're not just a trigger, they're the thing the hero must defeat.
 
Last edited:
I voted for the Cloaking Device (by which I presume is meant the one Spock and Kirk steal), because it never plays any role in anything afterward ever again. Even when the Pegasus has a phase-cloak on TNG, or the Defiant finally has a cloak on DS9, it isn't because of the stolen cloaking device. Its theft was meaningless except to advance the plot of that TOS episode.
At least, they used the stolen cloaking device to escape from the Romulan space...so yeah...it only canon use would have been to conclude it own stealing mission. Star Trek III made it rectroactively meaningless by having Kirk and co. using their own eyes to detect the cloaked ship.

Speaking of Star Trek III, protomatter's clearly a plot device, but not a McGuffin. It's only there to explain why the Genesis planet could have been created and why it shall be immediately erased. It's magic, but it's not really anecdotic. So, it's similar for the Red Matter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top