• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

More plot details for SGA: Extinction

SG-17

Commodore
Commodore
Joseph Mallozzi posted a few more details on his blog about the Extinction screenplay, but he hasn't been able to find out any information on MGM's plans and he doesn't want to discount a novel/comic version yet so he won't post the entire script yet. He does give a bigger set-up for the story.

http://josephmallozzi.wordpress.com/2011/07/16/july-16-2011-more-on-that-atlantis-script/
Many of you have asked me to continue offering some insight into the Atlantis movie (Stargate: Extinction) Paul and I scripted way back when. Well, attempts to find out if the studio has plans for the script have come up empty. And so, rather than reveal too much, I will offer a little more in the way of the set-up to the story. As I already mentioned in a pervious entry, the events of the movie take place soon after (maybe about a week or so) after Atlantis has returned to the Milky Way. It has been parked on the dark side of the moon, away from prying eyes, and operations continue as busily as they had back in Pegasus. Things are running smoothly enough until McKay is suddenly made aware that the city’s self-destruct has been initiated, the result of being out of range of the Pegasus galaxy for too long…

Of course, it’s time to get the band back together and we check in with our various team members as they are called up and beamed away for the return journey: Teyla and her family, Keller, Beckett, Lorne, Zelenka and, of course, Sheppard and Ronon who are plucked away while receiving treatment at a local hospital following a barroom brawl (we went back and incorporated the scar actor Jason Momoa received following an incident near his L.A. home). Once everyone has assembled, McKay gives them the 411. Given the time constraints they face, they have to get back to Pegasus as quickly as possible – meaning they’ll have to use the wormhole drive again. Zelenka calculates that two jumps should do it.

And they’re off. Sort of. The first jump ends up burning out the drive, rendering it useless and leaving them stranded with the countdown click ticking down. However, a scan of the surrounding plants turns up a habitable world within range. They go there seeking help and, instead, end up involved in a wild time-travel themed adventure in which Todd, the wraith, turns out to be, simultaneously, their hugest threat and biggest ally.

And that’s all I’m going to say on the subject for now. Although it seems increasingly likely this movie will ever get made, I don’t want to discount the possibility it may come to fruition through some alternate venue be it a comic book, novel, or radio play. Fingers crossed!
 
I don't know how I feel about this. I mean I want to see this, but I didn't expect much from anything Atlantis anyway. I mean it was the Voyager* of the Stargate franchise.



*I mean Voyager at its best. It wasn't bad in any way, but it wasn't great most of the time either.
 
I prefer Atlantis in the Milky Way (yay, no more Pegasus!), so I'm glad this seems like it will never see the light of day.
 
It seems like Stargate can't live without some time travel gimmick nowadays.

Why not a movie unlocking some STARGATE secrets and not jumping from time to time or alternate realities.
 
The need to get Atlantis back to Pegasus is too contrived, but while Stargate continually uses time travel, they usually do it well, so that just excites me. I consider time travel an endless well of ideas, so it's the execution that's important to whether it ends up good or not.
 
Wow, that's just incredibly lame.



Please, please let Emmerich and Devlin revisit their own universe in a big budget movie, without the crap that has been piling up in the - dare I say it - Malloziverse. It can only get better.
 
Yes, from that two line summary of the introduction to the premise, you would definitely know whether it's good or bad.
 
Didn't do anything for me. I always thought the title extinction would refer to demise of the Wraith.
 
What I don't understand is why they don't make these films big events. Ark of Truth was the only one, because it wrapped up the whole Ori story. But Continuum was just a regular episode story. And this Extinction story is also just a regular episode story. Aren't they recognizing this or is this really the best they can come up with?
 
What I don't understand is why they don't make these films big events. Ark of Truth was the only one, because it wrapped up the whole Ori story. But Continuum was just a regular episode story. And this Extinction story is also just a regular episode story. Aren't they recognizing this or is this really the best they can come up with?

How do you define "big events"? Continuum had the entire history of Earth changed so we could be easily conquered. Arc of Truth had... actually, I can barely remember it. They find a box and show it to one guy which magically wraps up a storyline poorly.

And when you read that summary for Extinction, it doesn't say all that much. I'm seeing a kneejerk reaction to the idea of time travel. It might suck ass, or it might kick ass. I don't know how anyone could assume based on so little.
 
Christ, Stargate "fans" are insane. First you bitch and moan about Stargate Atlantis being cancelled for SGU, then you bitch and moan about the proposed continuation of Stargate Atlantis.
 
Christ, Stargate "fans" are insane. First you bitch and moan about Stargate Atlantis being cancelled for SGU, then you bitch and moan about the proposed continuation of Stargate Atlantis.

Reducing it down to this is insane, I'd say. Why should anyone be happy about a continuation if the continuation is crap?
 
Yes, from that two line summary of the introduction to the premise, you would definitely know whether it's good or bad.

It could very well be good, but the premise is one that they've done so many times already!

True. But I'm admittedly a huge fan of time travel stories, and I don't see "time travel" as a premise in itself. It's a science fiction idea that can be used in many ways.
However, the idea of Atlantis needing to return to the Pegasus galaxy or else it explodes does seem like a desperate and contrived way to continue the SGA story, so maybe it's likely that the rest will follow that.
 
Yes, from that two line summary of the introduction to the premise, you would definitely know whether it's good or bad.

It could very well be good, but the premise is one that they've done so many times already!

True. But I'm admittedly a huge fan of time travel stories, and I don't see "time travel" as a premise in itself. It's a science fiction idea that can be used in many ways.
I agree, but just this little description makes it sound way too much like "Continuum." Just replace Todd with Vala and there you go.

If we're going to get an Atlantis movie to wrap up the series, I'd like it to focus on the existing timeline and the Wraith threat to the galaxy.

However, the idea of Atlantis needing to return to the Pegasus galaxy or else it explodes does seem like a desperate and contrived way to continue the SGA story, so maybe it's likely that the rest will follow that.
Especially since Atlantis was built on Earth!
 
I agree, but just this little description makes it sound way too much like "Continuum." Just replace Todd with Vala and there you go.

If we're going to get an Atlantis movie to wrap up the series, I'd like it to focus on the existing timeline and the Wraith threat to the galaxy.

To be fair, that description is sort of vague enough that of course it's going to fit.
And remember, it wouldn't have been written as a final movie, it would have been written as a first movie, and a way to return them to the Pegasus galaxy for future movies. Unless the Wraith were threatening our galaxy, it's not a story unless you return Atlantis to the Pegasus galaxy. The SGC isn't going to let go of Atlantis because of a far away issue that doesn't concern Earth.


Especially since Atlantis was built on Earth!

It was also sunk to the bottom of the ocean to keep it safe until the Ancients return. And most of them went to Earth, did they not? So it stands to reason that Earth is one place you'd allow Atlantis to land and stay! They can't assume that future Lanteans (or whatever they were called) would know how to disable this failsafe or would want to stay on the planet once they've already made a new home on Earth.

And what sense does it make to allow Atlantis to freely roam the Pegasus galaxy (they had no issue moving to another planet before), and yet not go further? At that point, what difference does it make? It's been taken from the planet it was left on. So the Wraith could steal Atlantis and land it on their home world without this failsafe being triggered, but taking it to Earth would?

As equally little info we have on this plot point, this one is just stupid. I'm sure they'll have some roundabout explanation as to why it works, but I can't think of a good reason for it.
 
Yes, from that two line summary of the introduction to the premise, you would definitely know whether it's good or bad.

It could very well be good, but the premise is one that they've done so many times already!

True. But I'm admittedly a huge fan of time travel stories, and I don't see "time travel" as a premise in itself. It's a science fiction idea that can be used in many ways.
However, the idea of Atlantis needing to return to the Pegasus galaxy or else it explodes does seem like a desperate and contrived way to continue the SGA story, so maybe it's likely that the rest will follow that.

Since this movie was originally meant as a two part season six opener it would make sense to get Atlantis back to the Pegasus galaxy.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top