^ My problem with Bonds stems from his lying about using PEDs. I agree that he shouldn’t be punished for breaking a (then) non-existent rule. I don’t have a problem with him (and other PED users whose numbers warrant election) being in the HOF, as he was clearly a great player and may well have been the most feared hitter of any historical baseball era.
I also believe that Pete Rose should be in the HOF based on his exploits as a player, but he should never be allowed to work in baseball again. As you pointed out, he bet against his own team, which means he almost certainly made managerial decisions that undermined the Reds’ chances of winning. I doubt he did anything that would have attracted the wrong kind of attention (e.g., playing Kal Daniels at 3B), but I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that he managed his bullpen differently during the games he bet on. Who knows what the ramifications of his decisions might have been? Did he cost pitchers money in free-agency and years of their careers by overworking them? I’m not sure anyone wants to know the answer to that question, but the fact that we have to ask it is why Rose doesn’t belong in baseball anymore.
I also believe that Pete Rose should be in the HOF based on his exploits as a player, but he should never be allowed to work in baseball again. As you pointed out, he bet against his own team, which means he almost certainly made managerial decisions that undermined the Reds’ chances of winning. I doubt he did anything that would have attracted the wrong kind of attention (e.g., playing Kal Daniels at 3B), but I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that he managed his bullpen differently during the games he bet on. Who knows what the ramifications of his decisions might have been? Did he cost pitchers money in free-agency and years of their careers by overworking them? I’m not sure anyone wants to know the answer to that question, but the fact that we have to ask it is why Rose doesn’t belong in baseball anymore.