As they used to say, Chick's dig the long ball. It's launch angle and all, now. The "bat parallel to the ground" at contact and driving the ball idea is out of favor. I remember reading once that Reggie Jackson called hitting a home run an accident because the swing was a slight uppercut. In a segment on Sunday's ESPN game, Kris Bryant (he of 199 strikeouts in 559 ABs in his rookie year) pretty much told A-Rod that he's looking to swing for a home run every at bat. Not to blast it into the second deck, but to at least get it to carry the fence. Others are swinging for the upper decks, though. There also seems to be less of a stigma attached to striking out as there used to be. The most strikeouts DiMaggio had in a season was 39 in 637 ABs in his rookie year. In 1941 he struck out just 13 times in 541 ABs!^Why are so many players today averse to just making contact? Gwynn and Boggs did just fine focusing on getting on base rather than hitting home runs.
Meanwhile, the Jackass has returned (and still wants to make an MLB comeback).
Maybe Dave Kingman was ahead of his time.

Frankly, the next efficient economic move for some teams may be to start rounding up players that may have little relative power but make contact and keep the line moving at the plate.
Bring back Whiteyball!

Last edited: