My understanding is this is a perception issue anyway. The number of interleague games hasn't changed recently. It's just that they're all season now.
true, it's just that there's one every day now as opposed to a 2-week novelty period.
Really, I'm ready for this to happen. Just give the DH to the NL and let's get it over with. I mean, it's DEFINITELY happening eventually, right? If not today, in 5 years? 10? It's coming, so let's just get there and be done with it. Get everyone playing with the same rules, and makes everything a whole lot easier. Give the NL a couple years to prepare for it roster-wise, but sure they'll figure it out quickly enough; just means the old slugger with crappy knees can skip having to go act like a statue at 1B, and you can play him until 38 instead of having him retire or switch to the AL at 35.
Yes, it's "exciting" when the pitcher gets a HR, or even a hit. Know why? Because it's so damned rare. That's it, the novelty factor. Know what they call it when the DH gets a HR, or a hit? Regular baseball. If
I got a HR or a hit, it would be VERY exciting, and high comedy. But I don't like my odds, and you don't want to pay to watch me give it a try. And then there's the 'strategy' of the double switch, which apparently only the mastermind managers of the NL can figure out. May be a tad overblown, not like they're playing chess while the AL is playing checkers. Just means the back end of your bench plays the last inning or two of a game instead of starting once a week and playing the whole game. Meh.
Just want to see the rules the same across both leagues, and we all know the DH isn't going to be taken away from the AL, so just give it to the NL and let's go. Can you imagine if the NFL said that in NFC games, you weren't allowed to use your place kicker and punter? Sure, it would be high comedy to watch some linebacker give it a shot, and amazing if he made a big one, but since the kicker and punter exist (and would be sitting on the bench in those games), why not let them play?