How much restoration should be done? Back to how the model looked when filmed?
Now that we know the buyers, the next piece of missing information is who the unit belonged to. It had Burton Holmes' stuff in it but he's been dead for ages, so we don't know if there is any actual connection to the person who was supposed to pay the storage bill.
Agreed. They took the 11 foot model back to (better than) original filming conditionHow much restoration should be done? Back to how the model looked when filmed?
Um... It's about 1/3 the size?Agreed. They took the 11 foot model back to (better than) original filming condition, so, what's the difference with the 3 foot model?
![]()
Errrrm actually; it's 1/4 the sizeUm... It's about 1/3 the size?![]()
Agreed. They took the 11 foot model back to (better than) original filming condition, so, what's the difference with the 3 foot model?
![]()
so, what's the difference with the 3 foot model?
ok, maybe sharing the wealth is a little unworkable, but still
Interesting thought, but there's nothing about that on their website.I thought I read somewhere (maybe this was in reference to aircraft) that the Smithsonian always leaves at least one surface unrestored.
the 11 footer had previously gone through a botched "restoration" that destroyed much of the original paint job. Only the top of the saucer is still original. So nothing the recent restoration did removed original material (except light bulbs).
The 3 footer still has it's last production applied paint. So my preference would be to repair the structural damage, clean all the original paint, lightly touch up the missing spots, glue down the remaining decals and replace the missing ones with reproductions. Replacing the missing shuttlebay door is optional.
the 11 footer had previously gone through a botched "restoration" that destroyed much of the original paint job. Only the top of the saucer is still original. So nothing the recent restoration did removed original material (except light bulbs).
You are misinformed and I could not disagree with this comment more. The original skin of the Galileo was masonite; not plywood. After sitting outdoors for years there was no integrity left and most of the rotten masonite was replaced with plywood back in the 90's. Just a very few small bits of the original remained and none was usable. The restoration done on the Galileo just replaced the skin; the steel frame, wings, nacelles, landing gear, door mechanism are all the original so the shape of it is exactly the same because the frame is exactly the same. The research and workmanship done on restoring it rivals the best restorations possible. Sure, it would have been nice to have it preserved straight from the studio but that is impossible but now it has been restored to it's former glory. I have seen it in person many times and it looks amazing. Thank God someone purchased it and restored it for us instead of it sitting in a junkyard or dump someplace.The worst restoration that was done was on the Galileo. They replaced everything but the steel inner frame. I saw the so called resto on youtube. They could have salvaged a lot of the plywood that was still in good shape as well as the windows and other features. They should not have hired a ship building company to do it. A prop master should at least been their to supervise. All they did was make a new one. Big deal.
I'm not sure that's true. I'm also not sure it's not true, but I can't find any reference that that is the case. I don't have the obsessive encyclopedic knowledge on the different epochs of the Enterprise's history that many of my friends do.Before the ship was first displayed at the Smithsonian in the mid-70s, the entire thing other than the saucer top was repainted a featureless primer gray.
You are misinformed and I could not disagree with this comment more. The original skin of the Galileo was masonite; not plywood. After sitting outdoors for years there was no integrity left and most of the rotten masonite was replaced with plywood back in the 90's. Just a very few small bits of the original remained and none was usable. The restoration done on the Galileo just replaced the skin; the steel frame, wings, nacelles, landing gear, door mechanism are all the original so the shape of it is exactly the same because the frame is exactly the same. The research and workmanship done on restoring it rivals the best restorations possible. Sure, it would have been nice to have it preserved straight from the studio but that is impossible but now it has been restored to it's former glory. I have seen it in person many times and it looks amazing. Thank God someone purchased it and restored it for us instead of it sitting in a junkyard or dump someplace.
The Galileo in the 90's
LOL, its actually probably 95% original by weight!!!! The two nacelles alone are probably 75% of the total weight.It's a classic Ship of Theseus paradox. The restoration retained the Galileo's structural steel framework, pylons and engine nacelles, so it's probably at least 50 percent original by weight, if that means anything.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.