• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Michael Phelps - Is he human or metahuman?

For instance, in 1968 Bob Beamon long jumped over 29 feet. At the time the Holy Grail for long jumpers was 24 feet if I recall correctly. Today, 40 years later, long jumpers are still a foot (more or less) away from matching what Beamon did. Many speculated that Beamon killed the event with that jump -- and for many years that was true. But we don't hear Beamon being called superhuman, yet what he did is a lot closer to "superhuman" than what Phelps has done.

No, there were jumpers in Beamon's era jumping 27 feet. World records in the long jump are alittle on the rare side it took some 25 years for Ralph Boston to beat Jesse Owens' long jump record that he set in 1935 and it was 22 years between Beamon's record and Mike Powell's.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_jump#Men

And speaking of Jesse Owens he did set three worlds and equalled a fourth world record in 45 minutes, nobody in any other sport has ever equalled that performance that I know of.
 
For instance, in 1968 Bob Beamon long jumped over 29 feet. At the time the Holy Grail for long jumpers was 24 feet if I recall correctly. Today, 40 years later, long jumpers are still a foot (more or less) away from matching what Beamon did. Many speculated that Beamon killed the event with that jump -- and for many years that was true. But we don't hear Beamon being called superhuman, yet what he did is a lot closer to "superhuman" than what Phelps has done.
No, there were jumpers in Beamon's era jumping 27 feet. World records in the long jump are alittle on the rare side it took some 25 years for Ralph Boston to beat Jesse Owens' long jump record that he set in 1935 and it was 22 years between Beamon's record and Mike Powell's.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_jump#Men
Thanks for the update. Obviously I don't follow Track like I used to. Still there has been little that has happened in any sport to match the magnitude of what Beamon did, when he did it.

I suppose I could be wrong but don't believe anyone was jumping 27 feet in 1968 or even 26 feet. In fact, I think it was some time before anyone jumped 25 ft. If I'm wrong on this let me know because I'm just going by memory.
 
For instance, in 1968 Bob Beamon long jumped over 29 feet. At the time the Holy Grail for long jumpers was 24 feet if I recall correctly. Today, 40 years later, long jumpers are still a foot (more or less) away from matching what Beamon did. Many speculated that Beamon killed the event with that jump -- and for many years that was true. But we don't hear Beamon being called superhuman, yet what he did is a lot closer to "superhuman" than what Phelps has done.
No, there were jumpers in Beamon's era jumping 27 feet. World records in the long jump are alittle on the rare side it took some 25 years for Ralph Boston to beat Jesse Owens' long jump record that he set in 1935 and it was 22 years between Beamon's record and Mike Powell's.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_jump#Men
Thanks for the update. Obviously I don't follow Track like I used to. Still there has been little that has happened in any sport to match the magnitude of what Beamon did, when he did it.

I suppose I could be wrong but don't believe anyone was jumping 27 feet in 1968 or even 26 feet. In fact, I think it was some time before anyone jumped 25 ft. If I'm wrong on this let me know because I'm just going by memory.

Edwin Gourdin was the first over 25 feet and that was in 1923. When Ralph Boston and Igor Ter-Ovanesyan were passing the world record between they were regularally jumping over 27 feet.

Beamon's record was incredible but he wasn't able to jump beyond 26 feet after it. Carl Lewis however has a number of jumps 28 feet or more.

http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/lists/display_list.php?list_id=9&sex_id=M&year=2008

8.9529-4 1/2Mike Powell (US)08/30/918.90(A)29-2 1/2Bob Beamon (US)10/18/688.8729-1 1/2Carl Lewis (US) !08/30/918.86(A)29-1Robert Emmiyan (SU)05/22/878.8429-0----Lewis !12/31/088.7928-10 1/4----Lewis06/19/83i----Lewis01/27/848.7628-9----Lewis07/24/82----Lewis07/18/888.7528-8 1/2----Lewis08/16/87
 
I am not attempting to elevate swimmers above track & field athletes; simply that swimmers are at least an even accounting. You can discount the fact that swimmers are buoyed by the medium in which they perform, yet track stars for example doesn't have to worry about being drowned when they stop their motions. What happens to Carl Lewis if he stops his sprinting? He simply can sit down or stand and expend no more energy until such time as he's recovered. Any swimmer has to keep going or rely upon someone else to get them out of the water. So the medium you fele gives swimkmers an unfair advantage at the same time saddles them with a greater challenge simply for living. Each one has its own pros and cons, it's true.... but they tend to balance each other out rather than giving the edge to one or the other.

Sorry, I can't demote Phelps just because he's a swimmer.
I think you're really reaching here. What Olympic swimmer worries about drowning? Much lesser swimmers than Olympians aren't even concerned about drowning. But have you ever seen a sprinter pull or tear a muscle going at full speed? Not only do they have to be concerned with stopping before further injury occurs, they have to worry about falling. Ever seen a hurdler fall? That is almost always horrendous.

If a swimmer pulls or tears a muscle, I would imagine they'd just stop and start to float on their own, or grab one of those lines marking the lanes. There is virtually no chance they'll actually drown with thousands of people around.

Swimming is a nice little sport, certainly deserving of being in the Olympics, and Phelps' accomplishment is noteworthy, but lets keep it in perspective. For instance, in 1968 Bob Beamon long jumped over 29 feet. At the time the Holy Grail for long jumpers was 24 feet if I recall correctly. Today, 40 years later, long jumpers are still a foot (more or less) away from matching what Beamon did. Many speculated that Beamon killed the event with that jump -- and for many years that was true. But we don't hear Beamon being called superhuman, yet what he did is a lot closer to "superhuman" than what Phelps has done.

Did any of the records Phelps set this Olympics compare to Beamon's? I don't think so. Congrats to him for his 8 gold medals, but they were in swimming so let there be an end to all the "metahuman" foolishness.

You know, there is a word called "exaggeration." Feel free to look it up. When I likened M. Phelps to a superhuman we only read about in comic books, I was, of course, exaggerating.

You, on the other hand, have constantly dismissed M. Phelps' athletic achievements as if they were insignificant, or at worst, non-existent. That simply is NOT the case here.

From my perspective, all I'm saying is that I have more respect and admiration for M. Phelps (as I do for so many Olympic athletes and swimmers) than these so-called superstar American baseball/basketball/football players that many people seem to worship. To each his own, I suppose. One man's hero is another man's villain.
 
You know, there is a word called "exaggeration." Feel free to look it up. When I likened M. Phelps to a superhuman we only read about in comic books, I was, of course, exaggerating.

You, on the other hand, have constantly dismissed M. Phelps' athletic achievements as if they were insignificant, or at worst, non-existent. That simply is NOT the case here.

From my perspective, all I'm saying is that I have more respect and admiration for M. Phelps (as I do for so many Olympic athletes and swimmers) than these so-called superstar American baseball/basketball/football players that many people seem to worship. To each his own, I suppose. One man's hero is another man's villain.

:lol:
 
You know, there is a word called "exaggeration." Feel free to look it up. When I likened M. Phelps to a superhuman we only read about in comic books, I was, of course, exaggerating.

You, on the other hand, have constantly dismissed M. Phelps' athletic achievements as if they were insignificant, or at worst, non-existent. That simply is NOT the case here.

From my perspective, all I'm saying is that I have more respect and admiration for M. Phelps (as I do for so many Olympic athletes and swimmers) than these so-called superstar American baseball/basketball/football players that many people seem to worship. To each his own, I suppose. One man's hero is another man's villain.

:lol:

'Nuff said. :vulcan:
 
Because other athletes have to fight the full brunt of gravity, while fighting other athletes, while still having to perform, I don't know any swimmer I'de list in my top ten greatest athlete. Now if we're talking about top ten aerobic athletes or best low impact cardio athletes, okay now we're talking swimmers. I don't put swimming on the same level as rhythmic gymnastics, but it ain't all that far away.

:lol:

Clearly a statement by someone who does not understand what competitive swimming entails at all.

"The full brunt of gravity"? Are you serious? :lol:
 
^From what I'm reading, he seems to think that swimming is easy, which is simply not true. Swimming is fucking hard work.
 
He's just a ridiculously hard trainer who happened to be born with the right body, including a literally freakish aerobic capacity. The latter is why he can recover as quickly as he can and why he can excel in an unprecedented program.

His build is freakish. But freakish in the way Frankenstein would have been if designed by swim coaches. He's double jointed which gives him that crazy power in his turns, has the wing span of a plane, and flippers with unprecedented amount of flexibility instead of feet.

Almost literally built for the sport.


And a face like Gomer Pyle.
 
His build is freakish. But freakish in the way Frankenstein would have been if designed by swim coaches. He's double jointed which gives him that crazy power in his turns, has the wing span of a plane, and flippers with unprecedented amount of flexibility instead of feet.

Almost literally built for the sport.
And a face like Gomer Pyle.
Uh-uh. Gomer Pyle is sort of cute. Phelps isn't. And at least we know Jim Nabors can sing. Can Phelps?
 
Because other athletes have to fight the full brunt of gravity, while fighting other athletes, while still having to perform, I don't know any swimmer I'de list in my top ten greatest athlete. Now if we're talking about top ten aerobic athletes or best low impact cardio athletes, okay now we're talking swimmers. I don't put swimming on the same level as rhythmic gymnastics, but it ain't all that far away.

:lol:

Clearly a statement by someone who does not understand what competitive swimming entails at all.

"The full brunt of gravity"? Are you serious? :lol:

Guess we are completely discounting the fact that water is a hell of alot harder to pass through than is air. :lol:

But then, that's just a small nit, isn't it? :p
 
Yes, most athletes deal with gravity more than swimmers must, but they don't have to deal with being 90% submerged in an unbreathable liquid, or have to push hundreds of pounds of said liquid out of their way to go anywhere. Swimming is the best cardio workout there is because it is damn hard. Anyone who discounts swimming as a 'nice little sport' has either never swam or is plain retarded. (does it count as a flame if I include multiple options?)
 
Yes, most athletes deal with gravity more than swimmers must, but they don't have to deal with being 90% submerged in an unbreathable liquid, or have to push hundreds of pounds of said liquid out of their way to go anywhere. Swimming is the best cardio workout there is because it is damn hard. Anyone who discounts swimming as a 'nice little sport' has either never swam or is plain retarded.
Don't get your panties in bunch, Precious. I never said what Phelps did was "easy". I even said that swimming was a great cardio workout, so we agree on something at least. Its all about reading comprehension, isn't it. But consider, how many times have you finished a long swim, jumped out of the pool and went for a nice long -- run -- to cool off. Now how many times have you done the opposite? I'm just saying.

It appears that the mention of "gravity" as a reality that has to be accounted for by all athletes one way or another seems to have thrown a few people. Surprising considering we're all Trek fans. Anyway, without restating everything I've already written, suffice it to say that gravity makes a HUGE difference between competition that takes place on land and that which takes place in water. Oh gravity does affect swimmers, just not as negatively as it does runners, or jumpers, or throwers, or walkers. There are many many greater athletes in much more difficult sports than swimming.

But this is really off topic as my original point wasn't to denigrate Phelps' 8 gold medals, but merely to offer some perspective to the thread starter who wanted to know whether or not he had seen more than just a "mere" human.

Keep in mind, Phelps won only one more gold medal than Mark Spitz did, and Spitz did it over 30 years ago. And did I anyone mention relays? Also, I don't think its a coincidence that these gaudy medal counts were both accomplished in the sport of swimming. Oops, there I go.
 
Posted by gblews:

Keep in mind, Phelps won only one more gold medal than Mark Spitz did, and Spitz did it over 30 years ago. And did I anyone mention relays? Also, I don't think its a coincidence that these gaudy medal counts were both accomplished in the sport of swimming. Oops, there I go.

:rolleyes: You may have denied it, but you only continue to show your ignorance when it comes to swimming. Of course, in your own little universe, people move faster underwater than they walk on land through dry air. :lol: Gravity-schmavity.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top