Michael bay has "redesigned everything" for Transformers 4

Discussion in 'Science Fiction & Fantasy' started by Candlelight, Feb 4, 2013.

  1. Admiral2

    Admiral2 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Location:
    Langley
    All I care about is giant robots beating the holy heck out of each other. I'm not going to waste time judging any other content if Bay delivers on that, like he's already done three times. (some of you really need to remove the damn stick...)
     
  2. USS Mariner

    USS Mariner Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Location:
    Homestate of Matt Jefferies
    Reducing our expectations/mental capacity to that level, in terms of the running time, we get less Opti-smash per hour with each sequel, which is honestly 90% of what drives the hate.

    If we had racist, homophobic robots for an entire film, I guarantee you that the hate would be far less.
     
  3. Trekker4747

    Trekker4747 Boldly going... Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2001
    Location:
    Trekker4747
    That's sort of the point, the previous movie focused more on Shia LeBouf and his "antics" more than it the the transformer characters. Hell, half of the last movie dealt with Shia looking for a job and coping with his too-hot-for-him girlfriend.

    The Transformers were barely characters in their own movies.
     
  4. Admiral2

    Admiral2 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Location:
    Langley
    But the flip-side of that problem is wall-to-wall robots gives a human audience nothing to relate to. The movie might as well be set on Cybertron back in the day.

    The Transformers have interacted with human beings since G1. That's the premise. Sentient transforming robots bring their million-year-old civil war to Earth and the people on it. Yes, the star human of the last three movies was particularly annoying, but humans have to be part of the story. I thought the movies struck the right balance...mainly because my main focus was the robot battles.
     
  5. Candlelight

    Candlelight Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2000
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Yes but in the series the robots were the stars and had the main storylines, especially in the third season. In the movies they take a backseat to Shia trying to get it on with Megan.
     
  6. Trekker4747

    Trekker4747 Boldly going... Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2001
    Location:
    Trekker4747
    Exactly. There's nothing wrong with having human characters but over the course of the movie Shia's needs/stories became bigger and bigger with the Transformers' story being almost an after-thought. Hell, aside from Bumblebee and maybe Optimus none of the Autobots or Decepticons are really given any character or personality -aside of the racial stereotype characters.

    The Transformers should have had much, much larger roles in these movies than what they got and should have had more distinct and notworthy personalities other than "the black stereotype one(s)" and "the Joe Pesci one."

    You needed some form of human characters, sure, but did we need to spend so much of the second movie seeing Sam's mom suffering from a combination of pot brownies and lobotomy? And the third movie on Sam trying to get a job?
     
  7. Admiral2

    Admiral2 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Location:
    Langley
    :shrug:

    I saw them as being like the old Japanese monster movies i grew up on, which had about the same ratio of human to monster action. For most of the movie the humans go around being human, being lovers, being comic relief, and then the big things beat each other senseless three or four times. I find that normal.

    As for the racial stereotypes...I just chalk it up as one of the many things I'm willing to put with if the rest of the movie is entertaining. Married...With Children was filled with stereotypes like that. I still laughed my ass off every episode.

    But larger roles will almost guarantee fewer robots per film, which would be counterproductive in Hasbro's eyes, because Hasbro's goal is to sell more toys. Fewer robots, no matter how deep and engaging their personalities, means a smaller product line.

    Yes, if you take into consideration how the project was presented to Michael Bay in the first place. It was Steven Spielberg's idea, and Spielberg thinks the core of the Transformers story is "A boy and his car." If a Hollywood icon hires you to direct a movie and tells you the movie's about a boy and his car, you can't just reduce the role of the boy and his life to an afterthought in favor of the car and his compadres, no matter how big of a douche the boy evolves into.

    The series was designed for kids to watch on TV for free with the ultimate goal of begging their parents to get the toys for them.

    The movies have to appeal to adults with disposable income to spend on tickets and junk food as well as the freeloading kids that will drag them to the theaters, so you need human soldiers with guns, human hotties in tight clothing, human mom's for comic relief, and yes, sometimes you need an an annoying snot to scream "OPTIMUUUUUS!"
     
  8. Gaith

    Gaith Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 11, 2008
    Location:
    Oregon
    ^ Well said. The only reason Shia/Sam isn't returning for the next movie is that he's become too expensive and unwilling to return. The fact that the studio has retained Bay, when it could just as easily have pulled a GI Joe 2 and hired some relative unknown at a much cheaper rate, and scripted a family of human protagonists as the leads, tells one all one needs to know about this forthcoming movie: it's gonna be the same horrible, soulless product the two sequels were. Until given firm reasons to do so, assuming any other result is pure fantasy.
     
  9. Mr. Laser Beam

    Mr. Laser Beam Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Confederation of Earth
    I'd pay good money to see that.
     
  10. Dantheman

    Dantheman Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2011
    Location:
    Michigan USA
    I heard toy sales was the reason they kept changing up Megatron's vehicle forms from movie to movie, like how he was a jet in the first, a tank in the second, and a Mad Max-like truck in the third, so kids would have a reason for their parents to buy it without being like, "You already have that one".

    With Optimus Prime, Bumblebee, and Starscream, well, they did do things like G1 repaints, and there was the Cybertronian hieroglyph "tattoos" Starscream got in the second film, and I remember seeing things like black repaints of Bumblebee and calling it Night Ops Bumblebee or somesuch, but yeah, there's only so much the toymakers can do that the filmmakers can give them.
     
  11. Admiral2

    Admiral2 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Location:
    Langley
    I wouldn't, because the fun part of bringing the Transformers to Earth was that they turn into earthly machines. On Cybertron, especially in Bayformers, they'd be featureless endoskeletons that would transform into featureless alien vehicles or weapons.
     
  12. Dukhat

    Dukhat Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    Wholeheartedly agree. I absolutely loved the first movie, and absolutely loathe the two sequels. I have no misconceptions that the new movie will be any different even with a new cast.