please define for me what a refridgerator girl is.
Well there you go. You would be the first person to jump down my throat for making a specious comment on something I actually hadn't seen.
That's my point! She wasn't expendable,
Yes, yes she was.
She was a refrigerator girl too. So it's alive and well. So I don't see why you'd say otherwise.
Well there you go. You would be the first person to jump down my throat for making a specious comment on something I actually hadn't seen.
Where did I do any such thing ?
As I said, I haven't seen the movie so I can't comment on it too much. You gave the impression that you had seen it.
I'll give the movie the benefit of the doubt and assume that Moore's character fights to become a front line infantry soldier because she feels it's unfair that men are asked to put their lives at risk in a way no woman would be asked to and that she's a champion of men's rights.
Yeah, that doesn't sound like the sort of movie that gets made at all ever to me either.
See nothing. The plot determines who is expendable and why. Harvey has a character arc, he has to become Twoface. Dawes is a facilitation for that arc and a source of tension regarding Bruce's desire to return to a normal life - she is quite literally defined solely by her importance to two men.See the part where Batman chooses to save her and not Dent. To the film's hero, Dent is expendable, Dawes is not.
There's a definition up at TV Tropes I think, but basically, girlfriends of men who are killed off (by a villain) in an arbitrary way as a plot point to ratchet up the tension and such.
Rachel Dawes pretty exactly fulfills this role.
Then how on earth is it something you generally reject? It's either so or it ain't.Problem is that it makes my point for me.
Well there you go. You would be the first person to jump down my throat for making a specious comment on something I actually hadn't seen.
Where did I do any such thing ?
As I said, I haven't seen the movie so I can't comment on it too much. You gave the impression that you had seen it.
I'll give the movie the benefit of the doubt and assume that Moore's character fights to become a front line infantry soldier because she feels it's unfair that men are asked to put their lives at risk in a way no woman would be asked to and that she's a champion of men's rights.
Yeah, that doesn't sound like the sort of movie that gets made at all ever to me either.
Your exact wording was "unless her reason for signing up in the first place is to show some sort of solidarity with the men who fight and die serving their countries, which I somehow doubt is the case, the whole concept is rather disrespectful towards those men." Which is not 'giving it the benefit of the doubt'.
She couldn't act honourably in any circumstances, under your rules, because she's female.
Hardly. She's perfectly capable but that's just not the sort of movie Hollywood makes. I would love it if they did!
Then how on earth is it something you generally reject? It's either so or it ain't.Problem is that it makes my point for me.
Hardly. She's perfectly capable but that's just not the sort of movie Hollywood makes. I would love it if they did!
Maybe they did. You don't know. In any case the point I was making was the one line in the film pertinent to your argument. Which you chose to ignore.
Ah thanks.The term "women in refrigerators" essentially came from a DC comic book - the Green Lantern issue in which Kyle (Green Lantern) Raynor's girlfriend - Alexandra - was killed by Mongul (an old Superman baddie turned GL baddie) who stuffed her inside Kyle's fridge. Basically it was an utterly pointless death. But it did have a point. To give the "dead girl" trope a name. And hence when a woman dies solely for a plot point she is now known as a....
Woman in a Refrigerator
So it can only be something you agree with provided it regards male discrimination?I used to disagree with it, now I see it as an example of how male lives are devalued.
I really find myself cringing at the idea of bringing up a Demi Moore movie but in GI Jane, the crucial line in the film was "they're not the problem, we are". When men can watch a woman die with equal equanimity to watching another man die, then we shall have true equality.
So it can only be something you agree with provided it regards male discrimination?I used to disagree with it, now I see it as an example of how male lives are devalued.
Maybe if I can construe women's suffrage as an issue of vital importance to right injustices given to men we might get somewhere...
Hermiod and his "girls issues".
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.