• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Measure of a Man: The solution.

It's an interesting sequence of events leading to the hearing:
1) Louvois tells Picard that Data can refuse to participate in the procedure, but can't refuse to be transferred to Maddox's command without resigning from Starfleet. Which makes sense as far as that goes.
2) Picard expresses concern that once Data is transferred Maddox might apparently coerce him into being subjected to the procedure. It's nice that Picard has such faith in a fellow Starfleet officer. :p
3) Data submits his resignation.
4) After Maddox protests, Louvois initially finds based on 21st century legislation, the Acts of Cumberland, that Data is considered Starfleet property by virtue of being a machine, and consequently can't resign. Unfortunately we aren't given much detail regarding the legislation in question.
5) Hearing.

It is unclear (and probably unrealistic) as to why matters are so rushed, nor do we know enough about the Acts of Cumberland to make any arguments regarding them one way or another, or even ask why legislation from the 21st century is being used as a precdent in the 24th century.

I think ultimately you just have to kind of go with it as setting the stage for a discussion as to whether or not Data will be considered to legally have the right to self-determination.

As to the fact that Data joined Starfleet of his own volition, it is stated in the episode that Maddox didn't feel he should have been able to do so. It's surely a point of irony that Data being allowed to join Starfleet was what later set the stage for him being considered potential property...but I'm not sure it's that different from serving in contemporary armed forces, where individuals who do so may willingly surrender certain rights. I'm less clear on whether anyone in the military ever found themselves in Data's position of being asked to submit to a dangerous procedure and had to fight for the ability to refuse it.
 
The problem with this episode is that the premise is just stupid. At that point in the story, Data has already been given a rank and several medals for his actions both are things that implicitly acknowledge sapience. You don't give a rank or a medal to a toaster!!!
 
So, in effect, it seems most of the rest of the 24th century Federation (including Starfleet) has -even if only informally- already long since moved on and accepted Data as sentient when they let him into the Academy. It's just that a few staunch conservatives refuse to admit this and are staging a rearguard action. Finding a conservative judge that's even willing to consider this 'case' in the first place of course helps this 'Karen' Maddox emphasizing on his 'rights' trying to win this fight.

<not being entirely serious of course>
 
The problem with this episode is that the premise is just stupid. At that point in the story, Data has already been given a rank and several medals for his actions both are things that implicitly acknowledge sapience. You don't give a rank or a medal to a toaster!!!
Well, in-universe it seems that Louvois was the only person in the whole Federation who realized that the mysterious "Acts of Cumberland" were pertinent to this particular case. Everyone before her had missed this particular piece of legislation, even the panel of experts who had decided that Data could enroll in the Academy, sooooooooooooo...
 
So, in effect, it seems most of the rest of the 24th century Federation (including Starfleet) has -informally- already long since moved on and accepted Data as sentient when they let him into the Academy.
I have to say that accepting him in the Academy was a formal act. It was a panel of expert to decided that Data could enroll in the Academy. And when he joined Star Fleet, surely there were a trail of documents and legal papers.
It is unclear (and probably unrealistic) as to why matters are so rushed, nor do we know enough about the Acts of Cumberland to make any arguments regarding them one way or another, or even ask why legislation from the 21st century is being used as a precdent in the 24th century.
These are surely the most problematic parts of the episode.

Why. The. Hurry!??!?!
 
There's always the possibility of the formality being a formality, Foreign Legion style. "So, Mr... Umm, No First Name No Middle Initial... Data? No parents? No place of birth? No date of birth? Welcome to Starfleet."

Timo Saloniemi
 
Why. The. Hurry!??!?!

Because they wanted it to be a single episode, I suppose, and also didn't want to give the impression that the Enterprise was doing nothing in between during this juridical fight? Might have been interesting to have these proceedings as a background arc over the course of, say, a season.
 
Because they wanted it to be a single episode, I suppose, and also didn't want to give the impression that the Enterprise was doing nothing in between during this juridical fight? Might have been interesting to have these proceedings as a background arc over the course of, say, a season.
Well, the dramatic reasons were evident. The problem was they didn't give any in-story explanation for that. Something like "Unfortunately the StarFleet regulations say that we have to decide in 48 hours" or similar.
 
Well, the dramatic reasons were evident. The problem was they didn't give any in-story explanation for that. Something like "Unfortunately the StarFleet regulations say that we have to decide in 48 hours" or similar.

Perhaps Maddox and that Admiral wanted to establish a juridical precedent before the higher legislative bodies in the Federation even got wind of this (probably these still aren't working particularly fast in the 24th century), choosing this moment in a remote sector where no proper juridical officers were yet in place :)
 
Perhaps Maddox and that Admiral wanted to establish a juridical precedent before the higher legislative bodies in the Federation even got wind of this (probably these still aren't working particularly fast in the 24th century), choosing this moment in a remote sector where no proper juridical officers were yet in place :)
So everyone was, well, in bad faith?
 
So everyone was, well, in bad faith?

Of course it's not believable, but I'm trying to find some semblance of a reason. After all, had it been really the case, all Picard would have needed to do was to appeal to these higher bodies and demand that this be stopped until the proper juridical bodies could be involved. As it is, the only reason I see for this haste is that Maddox didn't want to delay his research. Or some such thing.

Although I wouldn't put it below Maddox to try to pull such a stunt. That guy only seemed to be interested in getting what he wanted.... at least till the final scene of the episode.
 
Last edited:
Of course it's not believable, but I'm trying to find some semblance of a reason. After all, had it been really the case, all Picard would have needed to do was to appeal to these higher bodies and demand that this be stopped until the proper juridical bodies could be involved. As it is, the only reason I see for this haste is that Maddox didn't want to delay his research. Or some such thing.

Although I wouldn't put it below Maddox to try to pull such a stunt. That guy only seemed to be interested in getting what he wanted.... at least till the final scene of the episode.
And still I don't understand what was up with Louvois: first in, like, 5 minutes she decided that the rest of the universe, except Maddox was wrong in treating Data as a sentient being with rights, then after the Picard's Beautiful Speech which had proved absolutely nothing, because Data was still a machine, she changed her idea. WTF!?!
 
In order to pull the stunt, Maddox would need a few resources. The itinerary of the E-D for starters, so that he would be at the right starbase at the right time. The cooperative judge, for the stage that Maddox in this scenario must have foreseen, the one where he can't order Data to cooperate via existing procedure and absolute has to establish new procedure. And the cooperation of Admiral Nakamura, who's clearly being had here, since he doesn't even know Louvois and Picard are at historical odds. Unless he's smart with his deniability routine, that is.

It's not a one-man operation, and Louvois is more important to it than Maddox himself. Maddox plays Data into attempting resigning, so that this one and only out for the android can be blocked forever. But Louvois' active cooperation would be needed in every discussion, every step down the path. She also has the obvious vengeance motivation.

So why doesn't she follow through?

1) Because Picard's newest straw man, about android armies and slavery, would be enough to reverse any decision she made, by causing the wider legal community to care where the plight of a single machine never would have made them to?
2) Because time is running out, for the all-important reason X, and combined with 1, there's the risk of a delay that will ruin it all?
3) Because she now finally sees that this decision will forever be attached to her person, which is not quite what she wanted?

I think we should try and accommodate reason X in any case, since the hurry is there at every stage. I mean, of course the villains of the piece should hurry, lest the starship with or without Data depart to wait for a verdict and make the evil team lose all the leverage they have through the Picard/Louvois thing or the jury-rigged-jury thing. But we still need the unsaid X so that our heroes don't do exactly that, and remove the leverage by force.

We could say the RNZ is far away from all other UFP assets and there's nowhere to go in a hurry. After all, comms delays are almost unheard of in Star Trek, but play a role in several episodes dealing with the RNZ.

But I think the better way to go is to say there was no hurry other than that of the heroes' own making. The trap is sprung in full when Picard asks Louvois to find out the point of law, and Louvois goes back to her quarters, sips a cup of tea, and returns with her "finding" that Data cannot resign. It's Picard who then calls for an insta-trial, and it's up to him to withdraw from the trial at any point and instead engage in a rational stalling act. But he thinks he can win, so he doesn't withdraw, which the Maddox/Louvois team is more or less happy with, because they know Picard can't win.

But PIcard's stubbornness wasn't part of the plan as far as we can tell. And he can persist infinitely with it - so at some point, Louvois would realize she has to call it quits and squeeze some lemon out of the lemonade. At least she doesn't shift the blame to anybody else in the process...

Timo Saloniemi
 
^^ Well, this is a good head-canon I have to say!

Still, I don't know why this episode is held in such high regard. I mean, one just analyzes it for more than a minute and it doesn't make much sense!
 
Last edited:
I think it tends to be well-regarded more for the arguments raised during the hearing than for the circumstances that precipitate the hearing. I also think one needs to consider that at this point in the series, for first-time viewers, the questions raised regarding Data's place among his peers seemed relevant. We didn't have seven years plus several movies worth of exposure to him, and Louvois was presumably coming in as someone who'd never met Data before.

Hell, we still have arguments over, in terms of the right to self-determination, what separates Data from Moriarty from Vic Fontaine from the Voyager EMH from other EMHs from the Nanites from the Exocomps, and it's a safe bet that there are still plenty of people who believe that Data is just a machine operating according to programming.

It doesn't even end at artificial life, as Tuvix and the Cogenitor would attest...though there might even be some debate as to whether Tuvix is an artificial life form given the method by which he was created.
 
And still I don't understand what was up with Louvois: first in, like, 5 minutes she decided that the rest of the universe, except Maddox was wrong in treating Data as a sentient being with rights, then after the Picard's Beautiful Speech which had proved absolutely nothing, because Data was still a machine, she changed her idea. WTF!?!

Yes, Picard's speech could be summed up with: "You never know."
 
Essentially the trial disproved and proved nothing.

Riker "proved" that Data was a machine, which was never really in dispute.

Picard "proved" that Data could be self-aware but that we have no way of proving it one way or the other.

We're back where we came from.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top