• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Marvel's "Fear Itself"

Sorry I didn't see the rest of your post. Batman isn't "cosmic" though. There is a Batman primarily in Gotham City (Dick) and a Batman that can be everywhere else (Bruce). In no way has Morrison tarnished who Batman is supposed to be. If anything he's expanded that concept to a new level. Maybe the change is too much for fans to take? I dunno. I have admitted in previous threads that I'm biased towards Morrison to give an unpartial opinion but I've been enjoying his take on the character.
 
Yeah the March solicits are interesting. Particularly the Spider-Man one mourning one of the lost FF-post "Three" Also Hickman's relaunched FF#1 debuts.. Also Peter's new Spider-Armor debuts. With Bucky's trial right now, it does seem like events are progressing towards returning Steve as Cap right in time for the movie. I don't think that was a big stretch to think though. You've also got the start of "Fear Its Self" and the beginning of the death of Ultimate Spider-Man. Gonna be a fascinating month.
 
This is an unsustainable life for comic books. They can't keep going from big event to big event to big event with the characters either dealing with the fall out from the event or building up to the next one for the whole year. I suppose this does sell books in the short term, because there are people out there who try to get every book involved (like I did back when Infinite Crisis occurred at DC several years back), but ultimately this style of business caused me to drop comics all together. Not just a couple here and there over the course of several years, but all 20 or so books that I was reading at once. Cold turkey.

The fallout from Infinite Crisis (One Year Later) just made a lot of my favorite characters unrecognizable. Getting rid of Wally West in his prime (only to bring him back later), Grant Morrison turning Batman into a deadbeat dad, and the JSA getting like six new characters that I couldn't have cared less about. And the writing all suffered trying to accommidate these changes. The story lines no longer had any depth or heart, they were just trying to show all the changes and set up the next arc (Final Crisis, I believe). It's very sad.

They need to give it a rest with the crossovers. Daredevil is one of the best comic titles of the past ten years and the Shadowland crossover was a gigantic pile of shit. These crossovers are basically useless battles and lame shock value for the sake of lame shock value. All their doing Marvel is trying to squeeze every last penny out of their readership.

Matt Fraction being involved makes everything worse. His run on Uncanny X-Men has been absolutely awful.
 
"All Marvel is doing is squeeze every penny out of their readership" uhhhhh dur. That's exactly what all companies attempt to do. Again...there is a solution if you do not like crossover or events, stop buying comics and stop talking about them. That'll get their attention. These are going to continue because people like me happen to like them. Again as for a company wide event "Fear It's Self" is the first since the end of "Secret Invasion" to ignore that is just plain silly.
 
Another problem with the crossovers is that it cuts into the regular storylines of the various titles. Three issues dedicated to a crossover, back to normal for two, and then another crossover.
 
I love the crossovers but I don't care for the magical/god stuff, so I don't know how excited I am about this. I prefer to keep magic out of the mainstream comics it's too cheat-y and overpowered and unrealistic, if you can apply that word to superhero comics.

I'm really loving the new Thunderbolts, mainly for the art. I don't mind the crossovers at all because each issue they're being sent on a different mission, so it makes sense they'd be sent to the current crisis.
 
Is it really a good idea to reference the horrorfest that was Civil War while talking about a future project?
 
Civil War wasn't a horror fest and basically most of what happened has been done away with now or soon will be.
 
Civil War was their best selling event of the past decade, wasn't it? Wouldn't they want to repeat those numbers?

Civil War is what got me back into Marvel Comics after a decade long absence.
 
Is it really a good idea to reference the horrorfest that was Civil War while talking about a future project?

Except of course Civil War was good.

The Bendis helmed Events such as Disassembled, Secret War, Siege and Secret Invasion and the Fraction lead one, Second Coming, were the bad stories.

Fear Itself is probably one of the bad ones.

Fraction hasn't been doing too well on any of his books since he got the Eisner for Iron Man.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top