• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Marvel Comic's sliding timeline & its problems

You can't age the comics in "real time" because each issue only takes place over 1-2 days, a month passes between issues, and the next issue takes place right after the first one.

So the 700 issues of Superman or Batman only equate to 2-4 years of real time.
 
I don't like the idea of moving World War II into the 60s.

Slightly off-topic; did 9/11 happen in the DCU? I know Marvel did a bunch of 9/11 comics but the DCU initially pretended it didn't happen, using Our Worlds At War to substitute it (which was already being made before 9/11 happened ironically).

I dunno, but ignoring it would've been sensible, given that anyone being at all upset about 3000 deaths on Earth-616 or New Earth would be narratively retarded given that both those world's Americas live in a state of constant superhuman-driven genocide.

Dr. Doom crying over the September 11 attacks is the most asinine, insulting panel in the history of comics; and Magneto even showing up is just obscene.

Maybe it was really Xorn's other brother, who thought he was Osama bin Laden.

Skywalker said:
This is why I think they should have let the characters age and eventually be replaced by new ones. Oh well.

From 1956-2001 this was DCU SOP, and it was fucking great. Kevin Smith is a stupid fat jerk.

Nerys Myk said:
Dates, fashion and current events aren't that important to the characters.

What about the Mad Mod, or Dazzler? :p
 
Last edited:
You can't age the comics in "real time" because each issue only takes place over 1-2 days, a month passes between issues, and the next issue takes place right after the first one.

So the 700 issues of Superman or Batman only equate to 2-4 years of real time.
Time is fluid in the comics. Sometimes the storylines last a few hours, sometimes a few days, sometimes they can jump a whole year. The average storyline in a comic book lasts five or six issues, then a new storyline typically starts after that. Are we to assume every major storyline happens immediately after the last one (unless specified)? If so, the characters would never get any down time.
 
Well, not EVERY time, but 90% of comics end on a cliffhanger that is immediately picked up on in the next issue. And yes there are "One Year Later" gaps occasionally like after Infinite Crisis but those are pretty rare.
 
Comics have been doing "soft reboots" since the 40s. They used to retell Superman's ( and every other character) origin all of the time and each time it was set in the current time frame. Once the war over WWII referrences pretty much disappeared from characters backstories. Once a reference has become outdated you simply stop mentioning it or replace it with something current.
Sounds like the worst of both worlds - through constant revisions, each more weighted down by expectations if not continuity than the last, you lose much of a strong continuity's color, but you're still expected to do the hard work of following it, lest something important but arcanely complex happen!

No, thanks. :p
Continuity has become a labyrinth. Confusing and constantly looping back on itself. Comics survived for decades with out "strong continuity" that requires a PhD in X-Menology ( as an example) just follow the story. "Keep it simple stupid" is the best continuity, Superman is Clark Kent, he works for the Daily Planet, his pals are Jimmy, Lois and Perry. His arch enemy is Lex Luthor. Thats as "Strong" as it needs to be. You dont have to have every issue bleed into another.

Ignoring fashion, dates and topical references that have become outdated have little if any impact on continuity, anyway. Its fiction, all you have to do is stop mentioning them. Having the FF mention the Beatles, dance to disco or joke about Charlie Sheen doen't really figure into how they will defeat Dr Doom, save the world and get out debt. It wont affect the next time Doom shows up. He's not going to say "Bah, Richards! Your love of disco music sickens me more than your ineffectual, subpar intellect!"


Myasishchev said:
Nerys Myk said:
Dates, fashion and current events aren't that important to the characters.

What about the Mad Mod, or Dazzler?

Which proves my point, To paraphrase James Kirk "Bad ideas, let them die!" :p
 
Has anyone here read Marvel: The Lost Generation? It was a 12-issue series published in 2000-2001 that chronicled the adventures of the First Line, a group of superheroes active from the early 1960s up to shortly before the Fantastic Four gained their powers and the current age of heroes began.
 
^ Yep. John Byrne. Liked it. It went more or less chronologically backwards as a time-traveller went further into the past, if I recall.
 
I pretty much subscribe to Spiff's take as well. That being said there is a ton of retconning that goes on as well. Take for example Jonathon Hickman's reworking of Sheild and Hydra history that now spands centuries instead of being World War II nemesis. There have been little tweaks and revisions here and there.
 
I've been reading HICKMAN's SHIELD and it basically hasn't really acknowledged the actual SHIELD entity at all so far aside from mentioning the origin of the Infinity Formula that Fury took to become long lived.
 
An issue of X-Men Unlimited stated the year of Magneto's birth as 1928. He and Charles Xavier first met one another around ten years prior to FF#1, according to the Unofficial Chronology of the Marvel Universe. Also according to the UCMU, Charles was born 36 years before FF#1, making him 26 at the time he was introduced to Magneto.

Suppose the FF debuted in 1987 (which is what I've been thinking). Being born in 1928, Magneto would have been around 49 when he first met Charles. Is it at all conceivable that he would be able to relate to a person over twenty years younger than him, and think of him as a close friend and equal? Charles would already have spent some time in Vietnam by this point, but that's about it really.
 
Wait isn't Dick Grayson currently a Batman, and from what I read of it in the comics he was pretty good at it.

You've read different comics to me, the ones I read seem to delight in consistently pointing out that Dick isnt as good as Bruce, either via outright stating it or making subtle references.
 
What about Reed Richards rushing the launch if his spacecraft to beat the dreaded Soviets to study the Cosmic Rays?
It got retconned twice in the first year or two, I think. It was a trip into space, a trip to Mars and a trip to the stars. By the thirtieth anniversary it had become a hyperspace trip to another galaxy.

Also, in 1998 or thereabouts there was a one-off where the Thing apparently finds himself in an alternate world where the FF's flight took place in 1961 and Marvel time was real time; ie certain characters were now in their seventies, Onslaught (1996 or so) had happened years ago when for him it was only months, and Gwen Stacy had disappeared or died in 1973. The Thing even muses that not one of the FF had been around in 1961!

Is this not the Spider-Girl universe?
 
^ I have to admit to lack of familiarity with the Spider-Girl universe, though I think that it was set about 15 years from "now".
 
^ I have to admit to lack of familiarity with the Spider-Girl universe, though I think that it was set about 15 years from "now".

I believe that, at least around the time the Spider-Girl universe started, the concept was that the heroes had aged normally since the 1960s. So, May Parker (Spider-Girl) was born mid-80s or something.
 
After getting through this thread, the five years of real time for one year of comic time estimate that seems appropriate to the Marvel Universe has worked so far. Historical real world events just get shifted around. I don't have a problem with that. It doesn't make much difference to me if Frank Castle was in the Vietnam Conflict or the Iraq War, nor does it make a great deal of difference to his character.

It doesn't matter when Fury takes his serum or when Captain America gets taken out of the ice. It wouldn't matter really if the comics retconned Fury to be the son of the original really.

It doesn't matter what music Dazzler sings. It doesn't matter that Iron Fist was based on Bruce Lee. Heck, it doesn't matter that a lot of the early Marvel concepts were inspired from the "trippy" acid imagery of the late sixties.

Magneto's holocaust roots were not part of the original character and can be changed again without doing much to his actual motives. Just transport him to another conflict to give him a reason to hate Homo Sapien. He could pretty easily be Eastern Bloc European from the sixties of seventies, for example. A couple of decades from now, his family could have been killed by the Bosnian Serb army. Being part of the holocaust was a poignant retcon, but not one that has to permanently remain with the character.

Most comics still give the history of what the reader needs to know to enjoy a story right there in the convenient flashback panels. Marvel also publishes its "_______ SAGA" that provides a convenient wrap-up narrative of the history relevant to a modern story.
 
At what point did Magneto become a Holocaust survivor? I thought that was always there once his origin was established.

I would argue that the Punisher has to be a Vietnam Vet. So much of his characters and his old stories were built into the madness and corruption that went on in that war. I remember reading a lot of stories about him going after other 'Nam vets who went rogue.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top