Reliant was looking for a planet with specific characteristics. Wouldn't you scan each.planet in depth, and compare it to the previous data to determine reliability of the scans?
Um...no. I don't get how you're inferring that.
Well, I mean, that's where you'd be looking if you looked hundreds of thousands of light years away.
Reliant was looking for a planet with specific characteristics. Wouldn't you scan each.planet in depth, and compare it to the previous data to determine reliability of the scans?
SPOCK: It would be interesting, Captain, to return to that world in a hundred years and to learn what crop has sprung from the seed you planted today.
KIRK: Yes, Mister Spock, it would indeed.
Doesn't really sound like they're planning to keep an eye on things.
Partially disagree. You Need to map out all the major and some minor bodies in terms of orbits to insure long term stability for the biosphere you are creating.Well, yes, but who would be looking that far? I typed "hundreds OR thousands" twice... This is what would be involved in the Argus Array spying on Cardassians or being used by Cardassians to spy on Mars, etc. And in terms of currently favored Trek map setups, mere hundreds of ly would probably suffice nicely.
All surveying across greater ranges is credited to probes or starships.
So as not to waste time, you'd only scan those planets you thought matched your criteria (in this case, Ceti Alpha V, even if the records said that the local desert world was named CA VI), and you'd trust your scans. If the records could be trusted, there'd be no reason to scan, and indeed no reason to send the Reliant. Yet with the Reliant sent, anything that panned out in scans would be good, regardless of any records.
As for "in depth", we don't know what the Genesis test called for exactly. Probably not just a dead rock, or else Regula herself would have sufficed. CA V was different from Regula in having a breathable atmosphere, something that must be extra rare on dead worlds; perhaps the project needed a rare fallow Class M planet? Orbital specs wouldn't matter, then, only the specs regarding planetary classification.
OTOH, perhaps the Marcuses wanted to solve those interstellar famine issues by creating farming worlds right next to inhabited planets? They'd need something like CA V, then: a planet deep in local Goldilocks so that the logistics of moving the grain and vegetables to the needy would be simplified. And in Trek, stuff within Goldilocks would tend to teem with life, frustrating Terrell's team until they hit Ceti Alpha.
Either way, scans would only need to be skin deep, detailing the biosphere (that is, the absence thereof); everything else would be subject to big error bars so that the experiment could be repeated operationally in a host of other star systems, those in actual need. More careful scanning might take place once the experiment was actually performed, to carefully record before/during/after for posterity.
Timo Saloniemi
Partially disagree. You Need to map out all the major and some minor bodies in terms of orbits to insure long term stability for the biosphere you are creating.
There would be information in the Enterprise records to find the exact spot and velocity or the Enterprise when the Botany Bay was release. From that information Spock could find it quite easily.
And structures on the surface were not standard Starfleet. Or where did the Botany Bay buckle come from.
They appear to have been Botany Bay cargo containers, likely with the cargo they had packed 270 earlier on Earth.
The cargo containers look nothing like what we see in Star Trek the motion picture. They look nothing like anything we've seen in the original series. They're more likely something that was stowed aboard Botany Bay than aboard Enterprise. And it would be very stupid to set out on a sleeper ship into the unknown without equipment on board to get started on a new planet if they found one. They had to have been on some sort of course. What they intended to find when they go there we don't know, but assuming that they were deposited on Ceti Alpha V with Enterprise supplies is rather strange. Nothing on board those containers looks 23rd century. There are books and other items that are distinctly 20th century. Too valuable to 23rd century people to send with castaways. But likely things that Khan would have packed when he left Earth. And the cargo pods of the Botany Bay were certainly large enough to contain what we see in TWOK. Among them the complete works of Shakespeare, Moby Dick, Paradise Lost, a separate volume of King Lear, and those are only the title you can make out.Assuming such information would be recorded in the first place, which is unlikely considering how easily the heroes themselves get lost. "Detailed records" are a total waste of time in the usual case, which today is slightly dependent on how much memory one can cram into a system (not a lot), but tomorrow might depend more on nobody really having an interest in wading through it, even with the help of automation. Kirk doesn't even believe in recording CCTV; his ship would be unlikely to remember her previous thruster firings beyond a certain writeover time, in the style of today's flight recorders.
Form the Botany Bay, supposedly. Why would those two issues be related? Khan wasn't standard Starfleet yet wore the red shirt anyway.
Two things make that doubtful. Would the shape remain identical from the 1990s till TMP? And why would Khan have cargo relating to the colonization of a planet? He never planned for such a thing, it seems - he is mightily surprised when Kirk forces him to attempt it at the end of "Space Seed".
Timo Saloniemi
The cargo containers look nothing like what we see in Star Trek the motion picture.
They look nothing like anything we've seen in the original series.
And it would be very stupid to set out on a sleeper ship into the unknown without equipment on board to get started on a new planet if they found one.
but assuming that they were deposited on Ceti Alpha V with Enterprise supplies is rather strange.
Nothing on board those containers looks 23rd century.
There are books and other items that are distinctly 20th century. Too valuable to 23rd century people to send with castaways.
And I think Spock would be able to back track and figure out where they dropped off the Botany Bay and where it had drifted from there. He figured out harder problems many times on screen. So I see no reason why the location of the Botany Bay or retrieving its cargo would pose any problem.
Um... that labeled panel is a door and looks like the top of a box. It is not part of the container. And there are at least 2 separate containers. When you see through the door they cut between them, the two floors are not level.I presume that the personal items (including books and BB buckle collector items) from the Botany Bay were transported onto the Enterprise by Khan and his crew before he discarded the Botany Bay. After all, the Enterprise was to become their new home...The inside of the cargo container was labeled as "Starfleet", hence, not from the Botany Bay (pre-Starfleet).
https://movies.trekcore.com/gallery/albums/twok/ch3/twok0142.jpg (label seen under Khan's right arm).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.