Making the Star Trek Universe a Reality

[Sector 7]

Roddenberry was omnisexual... he would hump anybody... and believed anybody could- and should- hump anybody else.

 

[T'Girl]

Where's my love instructor? Gene promised me a love instructor.

Have you tried Craig's List?

 

[sojourner]

That, and they didn't seem to fully understand dark matter yet in the 24th Centry IIRC....

LOL! I appreciated the humor in THAT response! Thanks for a smile.

Are you the same one who said the TNG warp scale was more logical than the TOS warp scale in the Trek Tech forum earlier this year?

Boy, I had fun with that guy, wonder what happened to him?

As far as this thread goes, yes, it's spam. You (the OP) posted in the general trek forum about a subject that should be in sci/tech AND you are trying to sell something. (which is not allowed by forum rules)

Please take the pseudo-science back to whatever UFO forums you came from.

 

[Myasishchev]

I sell sanctuary. Ask me about my great deals.

Beyond only a few details, he could retrieve nothing.

 

[Cheapjack]

I would have thought people watch Tom and Jerry, cos they want to live in that world, for a bit.

Gene Roddenberry thought a little bit more. I think some are doing their best to see GR's world doesn't happen.

What's wrong with self improvement? Surely a selfish and nonselfish thing at the same time?

 

[Amaterasu]

LOLOL! "Nothing to see here," indeed!

It turns out that we didn't need to understand combustion (what fire is) to use fire, and we don't need to understand what the "Dark" Energy is to use it, either.

This is an incredibly illogical statement. Homo Erectus knew more about fire than we do about dark matter.

Hmmm. I think you need to grasp logic. It is irrelevant WHEN we used fire (or are you saying that Homo Erectus knew about the whole chemical reaction involved in combustion...?). Logically, we didn't need to know about the whole affair involved in fire to use its manifestations, just as we don't need to know the physics of "Dark" Energy to use its manifestations.

And, in fact, I think we know more than you're aware of. I suggest reading my book, as well as a book called The Field. It discusses the Zero Point Field.

Enjoy.

 

[Amaterasu]

Good luck to you. I would like nothing better than to be wrong but everything you have said reeks badly of psuedo-science.

As I recommended above... Read also The Field. Very well documented and enlightening.

Not at all "pseudo."

 

[Amaterasu]

I see we have a "Star Trek fans are gullible idiots" thread.

I suppose that's at least a change of pace from the usual "Star Trek fans are virgins" threads.

Excuse me... But you are a prime example of "Star Trek fans are closed minded and undereducated..." At least that's what I gleen from your response here.

 

[barnaclelapse]

Need to get World War III out the way first. Even Roddenberry imagined things could get worse before they would get better.

They often do.

 

[Amaterasu]

AND[/I] you are trying to sell something. (which is not allowed by forum rules)

Please take the pseudo-science back to whatever UFO forums you came from.

A. It is not pseudo-science.
B. I'm new and thought this looked like the best place to post.
C. If you read what I posted, THE BOOK IS FREE. Yes, I would appreciate purchases, but the product is available at the link I provided with no money required.
D. I thought the Star Trek people would investigate rather than be closed minded. I guess I'm wrong.

 

[Melete]

The book is not a Star Trek novel, but offers solutions to vitually all the blocks towards such a world.

tl;dr. (I'm not interested in your wake-up routine )

 

[sojourner]

Yep, you're wrong. We have a low tolerance for pseudo-science here. Now, if you were providing a peer-reviewed paper on the subject preferably published in a major scientific journal, then we wouldn't be harassing you so much.

 

[T'Girl]

Please take the pseudo-science back to whatever UFO forums you came from.

Amaterasu your media.abovetopsecret.com is a self described "Conspiracy Community Web site.' This is the name that they came up with for themselves. That is how it is labeled on Google. Their header specifically mentions UFO's.

A. It is not pseudo-science.

So you're saying that it has been subject to scientific peer review? Where please?

B. I'm new and thought this looked like the best place to post.

Putting it on miscellaneous would have been better. There is nothing wrong with bring out your ideas and concepts, but you expose your work to the general populace (not just people on conspiracy sites), you should be prepared for realistic commentary when you do.

C. THE BOOK IS FREE.

The book is also extremely difficult to download, perhaps if you also had it in a different venue it might be more accessible.

D. I thought the Star Trek people would investigate rather than be closed minded. I guess I'm wrong.

Investigate, okay let's start with your own words,

"I suggest how we could use "bailout" money to free us of money altogether" One of your ideas is to drive nations even deeper into debt, to place unborn generations even farther from the ultimate goal of living in completely debt-free nations, this is how you are going to free us all from money. I don't want to get all Gordon Gekko on you, but the reason we have money Amaterasu is because it has been demonstrated to work.

"cast off slavery to machines - all jobs no one WANTS to do can be given to machines" The U6 unemployment numbers in America is in the upper teens, we don't need even fewer job. Don't get me wrong I'm not some wobbly. But we need more people doing jobs they don't want, not less.

 

[Finn]

LOLOL! "Nothing to see here," indeed!

It turns out that we didn't need to understand combustion (what fire is) to use fire, and we don't need to understand what the "Dark" Energy is to use it, either.

This is an incredibly illogical statement. Homo Erectus knew more about fire than we do about dark matter.

Hmmm. I think you need to grasp logic. It is irrelevant WHEN we used fire (or are you saying that Homo Erectus knew about the whole chemical reaction involved in combustion...?). Logically, we didn't need to know about the whole affair involved in fire to use its manifestations, just as we don't need to know the physics of "Dark" Energy to use its manifestations.

And, in fact, I think we know more than you're aware of. I suggest reading my book, as well as a book called The Field. It discusses the Zero Point Field.

Enjoy.

Homo Erectus knew that fire emitted light, was very hot, could keep them warm, ward off predators, help them walk through the woods after dark, use to scare prey off a cliffside, perhaps to cook food. I'm not sure if they had found that it could be utilized to cauterize wounds (all it would take is an accident for them to notice). They could start them.

As for dark matter, it is pretty much theorical, as in it is used to account for the "missing mass" in the universe. We have no idea what it is. All we know is that there's something out there that physics have developed the concept of dark matter to explain measurements of the gravity fields, all that, with the stars going around the galaxy and all that don't add up according to the physics that we understand better. All we know that it's out there and a lot of it are probably not made of atoms.

So it's not that we don't know the physics of it. We DON"T KNOW what it is other than it's there, much less than knowing what fire was 2 million years ago.

 

[stj]

I must admit I haven't read the thread.

But, in solving any problem, even a difficult one like making a real Star Trek universe, you start with the easy parts.

It would be easy for certain parties to manage a WWIII.

We're on our way to Star Trek!

 

[ProtoAvatar]

Grandiose claims and crappy pseudoscience.

Amaterasu, the primitive men knew that fire works because, by accident, the experiment (fire burning something) happened in front of them, showing them fire working.
Previously, they had no chance of theoretically determining fire's properties simply because they didn't knew what fire is.

You claim to have invented a way to use dark matter without knowing what dark matter is?
Good luck with that one.

If you want to be taken seriously, you will need to come with a peer-reviewed paper, Amaterasu. Of course, the one you're supporting here will never pass such a review.